green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
cadc 1978
(2×)
congress might reasonably have concluded that greater flexibility in promulgation was needed in the area of grants-in-aid in order to provide for their expeditious administration
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Humana of South Carolina, Inc. v. Califano
(2×)
congress might reasonably have concluded that greater flexibility in promulgation was needed in the area of grants-in-aid in order to provide for their expeditious administration
discussed
Cited "see"
Medicare Beneficiaries' Defense Fund Ex Rel. Klass v. Shield
(2×)
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 294 (N.D.Ill.1970), aff 'd, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971); Calkins v. Blum, 511 F.Supp. 1073, 1088 (N.D.N.Y.1981), aff'd on other grounds, 675 F.2d 44 (2d Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. (Four Cases) United States of America v. Under Seal, (Four Cases)
See United States v. Gurule, 437 F.2d 239, 241 (10th Cir.1970), ce rt. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 679 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cubanski v. Heckler
(2×)
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 295 , aff'd 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 . 60 We conclude that ROM Sec. 2572-D meets both prongs of the Chrysler test.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cubanski v. Heckler
(2×)
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 295 , aff'd 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Simpson v. Miller
(2×)
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 294 (N.D.Ill.1970) (three-judge court), aff’d, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Philadelphia Citizens In Action v. Richard Schweiker
(2×)
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 295-96 (N.D.Ill.1970), aff'd, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Philadelphia Citizens in Action v. Schweiker
(2×)
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 295-96 (N.D.Ill. 1970), aff’d, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coppotelli v. Howlett
(2×)
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289 (N.D.Ill.1970), aff’d, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971).
examined
Cited "see"
Miriam Rodway v. The United States Department of Agriculture
(4×)
See Rodriguez v. Swank, N.D.Ill., 318 F.Supp. 289 (1970), affirmed, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971) (A.F.D.C. benefits excluded).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pueschel v. Connecticut
See Gaytan v. Cassidy, 403 U.S. 902 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 , vacating and remanding, 317 F.Supp. 46 ; Pollion v. Lewis, 403 U.S. 902 , 91 S.Ct. 2212 , 29 L.Ed.2d 678 , vacating and remanding, 320 F.Supp. 1343 ; Latham v. Tynan, 404 U.S. 807 , 92 S.Ct. 117 , 30 L.Ed.2d 39 vacating and remanding. 435 F.2d 1248 . 2 The State also argues that petitioner cannot raise Bell as a defense to his criminal charge because he has chosen not to challenge his suspension by seeking available judicial review of the suspension itself, so that he has not raised his contentions in the proper state forum…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jordan v. Weaver
(2×)
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 292-293 (N.D.Ill.1970), affirmed, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jordan v. Weaver
(2×)
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 292-293 (N.D.Ill.1970), affirmed, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh
(2×)
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289 (D.C.N.D.Ill.1970), aff’d, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971); Robinson v. Lorillard Corporation, 444 F.2d 791 (4th Cir. 1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pignatiello v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR SEC. JUD.
United States v. Reno, 522 F.2d 572 (10th Cir.1975); see also United States v. Gurule, 437 F.2d 239 (10th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 679 (1971); In re Grand Jury Investigation, 459 F.Supp. 1335 (E.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pignatiello v. District Court in and for the Second Judicial District
United States v. Reno, 522 F.2d 572 (10th Cir.1975); see also United States v. Gurule, 437 F.2d 239 (10th Cir.1970), ce rt. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 679 (1971); In re Grand Jury Investigation, 459 F.Supp. 1335 (E.D.Pa.1978); People ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bosh v. Fahey
In the instant case, the parties have raised some question as to whether an “Action Transmittal — Interpretation” has the same status as a formal regulation, notwithstanding that it has not been published in. advance in accordance with the Federal Administrative Procedures Act (compare US Code, tit 5, § 553, subd [b], with US Code, tit 5, § 553, subd [a], par [2] ; see, also, Rodriguez v Swank, 318 F Supp 289 , affd 403 US 901 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Massey v. Thiokol Chemical Corporation
See also Jefferson et al. v. Hackney, Commissioner, supra, 406 U.S. 535 , 92 S.Ct. 1724 , 32 L.Ed.2d 285 and Romero v. Hodgson, Secretary, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2215 , 29 L.Ed.2d 678 . 10 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Legion v. Richardson
See e. g., Romero v. Hodgson, 319 F.Supp. 1201 (N.D.Cal.), aff’d. 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2215 , 29 L.Ed.2d 678 (1971); Dandridge v. Williams, supra. The allegations made by plaintiffs are insufficient to show that the statutory coverage itself abridges their fundamental constitutional rights.
Swank, Director, Illinois Department of Public Aid
v.
Rodriguez
v.
Rodriguez
No. 1269.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1971.
Cited by 25 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (4)
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ill. Motion for leave to amend jurisdictional statement, and motion of appellees for leave -to proceed in forma pauperis, granted. Judgment affirmed.
[For earlier order herein, see 401 U. S. 990.]