green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Reed v. Lukhard
Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 294 (N.D.Ill.1970), aff'd 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 *1252 (1971).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
National Wildlife Federation v. John W. Snow, in His Official Capacity as Administrator, Federal Highway Administration
See, e.g., Housing Authority of the City of Omaha v. U.S. Housing Authority, 468 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 927 , 93 S.Ct. 1360 , 35 L.Ed.2d 588 (1973); Rainbow Valley Citrus Corp. v. FCIC, 506 F.2d 467 (9th Cir. 1974); Langevin v. Chenango Court, Inc., 447 F.2d 296 (2d Cir. 1971); Hahn v. Gottlieb, 430 F.2d 1243 (1st Cir. 1970); Rodriquez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289 (N.D.Ill.1970) affd by memorandum order, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.ct. 2202, 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Medicare Beneficiaries' Defense Fund Ex Rel. Klass v. Shield
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 294 (N.D.Ill.1970), aff 'd, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971); Calkins v. Blum, 511 F.Supp. 1073, 1088 (N.D.N.Y.1981), aff'd on other grounds, 675 F.2d 44 (2d Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Cubanski v. Heckler
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 295 , aff'd 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 .
cited
Cited "see"
Cubanski v. Heckler
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 295 , aff'd 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 . 60 We conclude that ROM Sec. 2572-D meets both prongs of the Chrysler test.
cited
Cited "see"
Simpson v. Miller
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 294 (N.D.Ill.1970) (three-judge court), aff’d, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Philadelphia Citizens In Action v. Richard Schweiker
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 295-96 (N.D.Ill.1970), aff'd, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Philadelphia Citizens in Action v. Schweiker
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 295-96 (N.D.Ill. 1970), aff’d, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Humana of South Carolina, Inc. v. Califano
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 296 (N.D.Ill.1970), aff’d, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971) (“Congress might reasonably have concluded that greater flexibility in promulgation was needed in the area of grants-in-aid in order to provide for their expeditious administration”); cf. Rainbow Valley Citrus Corp. v. Federal Crop Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Coppotelli v. Howlett
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289 (N.D.Ill.1970), aff’d, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miriam Rodway v. The United States Department of Agriculture
(2×)
See Rodriguez v. Swank, N.D.Ill., 318 F.Supp. 289 (1970), affirmed, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971) (A.F.D.C. benefits excluded).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pueschel v. Connecticut
See Gaytan v. Cassidy, 403 U.S. 902 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 , vacating and remanding, 317 F.Supp. 46 ; Pollion v. Lewis, 403 U.S. 902 , 91 S.Ct. 2212 , 29 L.Ed.2d 678 , vacating and remanding, 320 F.Supp. 1343 ; Latham v. Tynan, 404 U.S. 807 , 92 S.Ct. 117 , 30 L.Ed.2d 39 vacating and remanding. 435 F.2d 1248 . 2 The State also argues that petitioner cannot raise Bell as a defense to his criminal charge because he has chosen not to challenge his suspension by seeking available judicial review of the suspension itself, so that he has not raised his contentions in the proper state forum…
cited
Cited "see"
Jordan v. Weaver
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 292-293 (N.D.Ill.1970), affirmed, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 .
cited
Cited "see"
Jordan v. Weaver
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 292-293 (N.D.Ill.1970), affirmed, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 .
cited
Cited "see"
Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh
See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289 (D.C.N.D.Ill.1970), aff’d, 403 U.S. 901 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971); Robinson v. Lorillard Corporation, 444 F.2d 791 (4th Cir. 1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ad Hoc Committee on Consumer Protection
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1534.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1971.
Published
Appeal from D. C. D. C. Motion to dispense with printing jurisdictional statement granted. Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.