Marshall & Huschart Mach. Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 363 U.S. 820 (1960). · Go Syfert
Search
Marshall & Huschart Mach. Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 363 U.S. 820 (1960). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ray C. Blackburn v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (ca6, 1982-06-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ray C. Blackburn v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
6th Cir. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Olshausen v. Commissioner, 273 F.2d 23 (9th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 820 , 80 S.Ct. 1256 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1517 (1960); Barnstone v. McKeever, 477 F.Supp. 108 (S.D.Tex.1979); cf. Johnston v. Commissioner, 429 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1970).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jones
Kan. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g. , People v. Caruso , 174 Cal. App. 2d 624 , 647, 345 P.2d 282 (1959), cert. denied , 363 U.S. 819 , 80 S. Ct. 1259 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1517 (1960) (finding no abuse of discretion where condition of probation required the defendant to 'remain out of the automobile business' even though the 'automobile business is the only one which he knows' in car dealership fraud case); State v. Fox , 22 Conn. App. 449 , 457, 577 A.2d 1111 (1990) ('[T]he special condition prohibiting the defendant from engaging in private real estate work during the period of probation was reasonably related to his rehabilit…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Henson v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., People v. Caruso, 174 Cal.App.2d 624, 647 , 345 P.2d 282 (1959), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 819 , 80 S.Ct. 1259 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1517 (1960) (finding no abuse of discretion where condition of probation required the defendant to “remain out of the automobile business” even though the “automobile business is the only one which he knows” in car dealership fraud case); State v. Fox, 22 Conn.App. 449, 457 , 577 A.2d 1111 (1990) (“[T]he special condition prohibiting the defendant from engaging in private real estate work during the period of probation was reasonably related to his rehabil…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marshall & Huschart Machinery Co.
v.
Department of Revenue, State of Illinois
No. 928.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 13, 1960.
363 U.S. 820
Fred W. Potter and Edward P. Morse for petitioner. Grenville Beardsley, Attorney General of Illinois, William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow and A. Zola Graves, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Cited by 30 opinions  |  Published

Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.