Superior Court of Wash. for King Cty. v. Washington Ex Rel. Yellow Cab Serv., Inc., 361 U.S. 373 (1960). · Go Syfert
Search
Superior Court of Wash. for King Cty. v. Washington Ex Rel. Yellow Cab Serv., Inc., 361 U.S. 373 (1960). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[c]ontingent fees may be disallowed as between attorney and client in spite of contingent fee retainer agreements, where the amount becomes large enough to be out of all proportion to the value of the professional services rendered”
49 citation events across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Complaint of Cap'n Rick Corp. (nysd, 1981-07-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Complaint of Cap'n Rick Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1981 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
ontingent fees may be disallowed as between attorney and client in spite of contingent fee retainer agreements, where the amount becomes large enough to be out of all proportion to the value of the professional services rendered
discussed Cited "see" Findley v. Falise (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
E.D.N.Y · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gair v. Peck, 6 Misc.2d 739, 741 , 165 N.Y.S.2d 247, 249 (Sup. Ct.1957), aff'd, 5 A.D.2d 303 , 171 N.Y.S.2d 594 (App.Div.3d Dep’t 1958), rev’d, 6 N.Y.2d 97 , 188 N.Y.S.2d 491 , 160 N.E.2d 43 , remittitur amended, 6 N.Y.2d 983 , 191 N.Y.S.2d 951 , 161 N.E.2d 736 (1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 374 , 80 S.Ct. 401 , 4 L.Ed.2d 380 (1960) (describing history of Rule 4).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos Litigation (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
S.D.N.Y. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gair v. Peck, 6 Misc.2d 739, 741 , 165 N.Y.S.2d 247, 249 (Sup. Ct.1957), aff'd, 5 A.D.2d 303 , 171 N.Y.S.2d 594 (App.Div.3d Dep't 1958), rev'd, 6 N.Y.2d 97 , 188 N.Y.S.2d 491 , 160 N.E.2d 43 , remittitur amended, 6 N.Y.2d 983 , 191 N.Y.S.2d 951 , 161 N.E.2d 736 (1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 374 , 80 S.Ct. 401 , 4 L.Ed.2d 380 (1960) (describing history of Rule 4).
discussed Cited "see" Cooper v. Singer
10th Cir. · 1983 · signal: accord · confidence high
See American Trial Lawyers Ass'n v. New Jersey Supreme Court, 66 N.J. 258 , 330 A.2d 350 (1974) (courts may promulgate rules regulating contingent fee arrangements); accord Gair v. Peck, 6 N.Y.2d 97 , 188 N.Y.S.2d 491 , 160 N.E.2d 43 (1959), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 361 U.S. 374 , 80 S.Ct. 401 , 4 L.Ed.2d 380 (1960); Annot., 77 A.L.R.2d 411 (1961).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hymen Schlesinger and David A. Hensler v. Hon. Hubert Teitelbaum, United States District Judge
3rd Cir. · 1973 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Special Rule 4 Regulating Conduct of Attorneys of the First and Second Judicial Departments of New York, as reproduced at note 1 in Gair v. Peck, 6 N.Y.2d 97 , 188 N.Y.S.2d 491 , 160 N.E.2d 43, 45-46 (1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 374 , 80 S.Ct. 401 , 4 L.Ed.2d 380 (1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY ET AL.
v.
WASHINGTON EX REL. YELLOW CAB SERVICE, INC.
76.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1960.
361 U.S. 373
Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.

Richard P. Donaldson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Samuel B. Bassett.

Kenneth A. Cox argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Herbert S. Little and Warren R. Slemmons.

Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli and Florian J. Bartosic filed a brief for the National Labor Relations Board, as amicus curiae, in support of petitioners.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U. S. 236.