green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McLennan v. United States
See Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 376 , 135 F.Supp. 881 (1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 909 , 76 S.Ct. 694 , 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956), reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 552 , 1 L.Ed.2d 562 (1957), reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 898 , 81 S.Ct. 218 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
McLennan v. United States
See Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 376 , 135 F.Supp. 881 (1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 909 , 76 S.Ct. 694 , 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956), reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 552 , 1 L.Ed.2d 562 (1957), reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 898 , 81 S.Ct. 218 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southland Royalty Co. v. United States
See Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 376 , 135 F.Supp. 881 (1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 909 , 76 S.Ct. 694 , 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956), reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 552 , 1 L.Ed.2d 562 (1957), reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 898 , 81 S.Ct. 218 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allstate Insurance v. United States
See Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 376 , 135 F.Supp. 881 (1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 909 , 76 S.Ct. 694 , 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956), reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 552 , 1 L.Ed.2d 562 (1957), reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 898 , 81 S.Ct. 218 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
General Motors Corp. v. Capitol Chevrolet Co.
See 364 U.S. 444 , 81 S.Ct. 235 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960), rehearing denied, 364 U.S. 939 , 81 S.Ct. 377 , 5 L.Ed.2d 371 (1961).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas
v.
Virginia
v.
Virginia
43.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 21, 1960.
Cornelius H. Doherty argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner., R. D. Mcllwaine III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were A. S. Harrison, Jr., Attorney General, and John W. Knowles, Assistant Attorney General.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Circuit Court of Arlington County of the Commonwealth of Virginia is reversed and the case is remanded to that court. Blodgett v. Silberman, 277 U. S. 1, 18.
Mr. Justice Black dissents for the same reason expressed by Mr. Justice Holmes in Union Transit Co. v. Kentucky, 199 U. S. 194, 211:
“It seems to me that the result reached by the Court probably is a desirable one, but I hardly understand how it can be deduced from the Fourteenth Amendment . . . .”