Habron v. Epstein, 429 U.S. 802 (1976). · Go Syfert
Habron v. Epstein, 429 U.S. 802 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
77 citation events across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mastro v. Brodie (colo, 1984-05-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Mastro v. Brodie (2×)
Colo. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Landgraff v. Wagner, 26 Ariz.App. 49 , 546 P.2d 26 (Ariz.App.), appeal dismissed, 429 U.S. 806 , 97 S.Ct. 40 , 50 L.Ed.2d 67 (1976); Dunn v. St.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Randall v. Fairmont City Police Department (2×)
W. Va. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also syl. pts. 1, 2 & 4, Brown v. Wichita State University, 219 Kan. 2 , 547 P.2d 1015 (upholding legislative restoration of governmental tort immunity previously abolished judicially, but involving immunity of state), opinion on reh’g, appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction sub nom., Bruce v. Wichita State University, 429 U.S. 806 , 97 S.Ct. 41 , 50 L.Ed.2d 67 (1976); Cords v. State, 62 Wis.2d 42 , 214 N.W.2d 405, 410 (1974) (state’s constitutionally derived governmental tort immunity may, under constitution, be waived by legislature, but until so waived, immunity does not offend �…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Black v. Ball Janitorial Service, Inc.
Okla. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
Baccus v. Banks, 199 Okl. 647 , 192 P.2d 683, 692 [1948]; Tucker v. McCrory, Okl., 266 P.2d 433, 434 [1954]; Woods v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 207 Okl. 490 , 251 P.2d 505, 509 [1952] and McCarroll v. Doctors General Hosp., Okl., 664 P.2d 382, 387 [1983]; see also, Landgraff v. Wagner, 546 P.2d 26 , 26 Ariz.App. 49 [1976], appeal dismissed, 429 U.S. 806 , 97 S.Ct. 40 , 50 L.Ed.2d 67 [1977]. 11 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Habron
v.
Epstein, Commissioner of Labor and Industry of Maryland
No. 75-1913.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
429 U.S. 802
Published

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. Md. Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.