green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.5 score
“because the combination rate offer is voluntary, we agree with the district court that it is not illegal per se as a tying arrangement”
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Vest
the exemption applies, then, even if the purpose of the conversation is criminal, as long as the purpose of the recording is not.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robert's Waikiki U-Drive, Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.
because the combination rate offer is voluntary, we agree with the district court that it is not illegal per se as a tying arrangement
cited
Cited "see"
White v. White
See United States v. Turk, 526 F. 2d 654, 658-59 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct . 74, 50 L.Ed. 2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976) (holding that there was no interception when the police listened to a tape of a telephone conversation previously recorded by one of the parties to the conversation).
cited
Cited "see"
Peavy v. Harman
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 658 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
David S. Reynolds v. Juanita Spears
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 659 (5th Cir.) (“we conclude that no new and distinct interception occurs when the contents of a communication are revealed through the replaying of a previous recording”), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); cf. United States v. *433 Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519, 1527 (11th Cir.) (“the term ‘intercept’ as it relates to ‘aural acquisitions’ refers to the place where a communication is initially obtained regardless of where the communication is ultimately heard”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 S.Ct. 82 , 102 L.Ed…
discussed
Cited "see"
Reynolds v. Spears
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 659 (5th Cir.) ("we conclude that no new and distinct interception occurs when the contents of a communication are revealed through the replaying of a previous recording"), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); cf. United States v. Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519, 1527 (11th Cir.) ("the term 'intercept' as it relates to 'aural acquisitions' refers to the place where a communication is initially obtained regardless of where the communication is ultimately heard"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 S.Ct. 82 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re State Police Litigation
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 658 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976). 35 Thus while the Act does not precisely define what an interception is, it must be deemed to have occurred “when the contents of wire communications are captured or redirected in any way.” United States v. Rodriguez, 968 F.2d 130, 136 (2d Cir.) (holding both location where conversation was redirected and where it was overheard sufficed as situs of “interception” for jurisdictional purposes), cert. denied, — U.S. -, -, -, 113 S.Ct. 139 , 140, 663, 121 L.Ed.2d 92 ,…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mauro
See United States v. Bianco, 534 F.2d 501 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daccarett
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 658 (5th Cir.) (act requires “contemporaneous acquisition of the communication through the use of the device”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 658 (5th Cir.) (act requires "contemporaneous acquisition of the communication through the use of the device"), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shu Yan Eng
See generally United States v. Bianco, 534 F.2d 501 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shu Yan Eng
See generally United States v. Bianco, 534 F.2d 501 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fred B. Black, Jr., (Two Cases)
See United States v. Bianco, 534 F.2d 501, 504-06 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Joseph Caswell, A/K/A Don Dawson, John J. Dawson, Jack Quinn, Richard Quinn, Bill Burns, \Sam
United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 784-85 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); see United States v. Bianco, 534 F.2d 501, 506-07 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Skepton v. County of Bucks, Pa.
See Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Asbestos School Litigation
See Unger v. Dunkin’ Donuts of Am., Inc., 68 F.R.D. 65, 79, 139 (E.D.Pa.1975) rev’d, 531 F.2d 1211 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Contreras, William Ray Soto, Reynaldo Garcia, Jr., and Kenneth James Cassie
(2×)
See United States v. Bianco, 534 F.2d 501, 508-10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Redd Horne, Inc.
See Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211 , 1218 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Innovation Data Processing, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
See Northern Pacific Railway v. United States, 356 U.S. 1 , 78 S.Ct. 514 , 2 L.Ed.2d 545 (1958), and Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts, 531 F.2d 1211 , 1223-24 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.
See Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of America, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211, 1224 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1013, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,714 Association Against Discrimination in Employment, Inc., Roosevelt Johnson, Craig Kelly, Charles Herd, Robert Lewis, William Cary, Charles R. Young, Herman Agosto, Harmin Linares, Ismael Pomales, Salvador Perez, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. City of Bridgeport, Nicholas Panuzio, Robert W. Weeks, Jr., Edward F. Daley, Julius Nobili, William G. Pjura, Frank J. Deprinzio, Alan Cohen, Bridgeportcivil Service Commission, Charles E. Porzelt, Andrew Gottfried, Salvatore s.spadaccino,charles J. Dougiello, John J. Hannon, John F. Gleason, David Sullivan, Williamd. Miklus, Albert Schwarz, Bridgeport Board of Fire Commissioners, Individuallyand in Their Official Capacities, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, and Bridgeport Firefighters for Merit Employment, Inc., Joseph Dicarlo, Thomasnaples, Philip Lynch, Bruno Bressie, Thomas O'connell, Frank G. Bender, Androbert B. Anderson, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420, 428-29 (2d Cir.), rehearing en banc denied, 531 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Association Against Discrimination in Employment, Inc. v. City of Bridgeport
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420, 428-29 (2d Cir.), rehearing en banc denied, 531 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bob Maxfield, Inc., D/B/A Bob Maxfield American, and William Fraker and Aileen Fraker, Plaintiffs-Cross v. American Motors Corporation, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs- Appellees-Cross v. James R. Maxfield, Iii, Third Party Defendants-Appellants-Cross
See Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts, 3 Cir. 1976, 531 F.2d 1211 , 1224-25, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); Halverson v. Convenient Food Mart, Inc., 1974, N.D.Ill., 69 F.R.D. 331, 335-36 ; Abercrombie v. Lum's, Inc., 1972, S.D.Fla., 345 F.Supp. 387, 391 ; Lah v. Shell Oil Co., 1970, S.D.Ohio, 50 F.R.D. 198 10 Bob Maxfield's full name is James R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bob Maxfield, Inc. v. American Motors Corp.
See Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts, 3 Cir. 1976, 531 F.2d 1211 , 1224-25, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); Halverson v. Convenient Food Mart, Inc., 1974, N.D.Ill., 69 F.R.D. 331, 335-36 ; Abercrombie v. Lum’s, Inc., 1972, S.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Vulcan Soc., Etc. v. Fire Dept., Etc.
See generally Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420, 428-30 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); Underwood v. New York State Office of Court Administration, 23 E.P.D. ¶ 30,981 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (Haight, J.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vulcan Society of Westchester County, Inc. v. Fire Department of White Plains
See generally Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420, 428-30 (2d Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); Underwood v. New York State Office of Court Administration, 23 E.
cited
Cited "see"
Alexander v. Bahou
See generally, Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420 , 427, reh. en banc denied 531 F.2d 5 , cert. denied 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nelson
See, United States v. *475 Eucker, 532 F.2d 249 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baker v. City of Detroit
See Kirkland v. New York Dept. of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420 , reh. en banc denied, 531 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); Bridgeport Guardians, Inc. v. Bridgeport Civil Service Comm., 482 F.2d 1333 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 991 , 95 S.Ct. 1997 , 44 L.Ed.2d 481 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Watson v. Magee Women's Hospital
See Kirkland v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420 , 425 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976), reh. denied, 429 U.S. 1124 , 97 S.Ct. 1162 , 51 L.Ed.2d 574 (1976), where Judge Van Graafeiland wrote: “Proof in employment discrimination cases proceeds from effect to cause.
discussed
Cited "see"
Preston v. Thompson
See Kirkland v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Serv., 520 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976) 1 It is to be noted in the present litigation that there has been no determination made that the prisoners' Eighth Amendment rights to be free from cruel and unusual punishment have been violated 2 The fact that a party does not seek a stay of all parts of an injunction should not, it would seem, prevent that party from seeking a complete invalidation on appeal.
cited
Cited "see"
Preston v. Thompson
See Kirkland v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Serv., 520 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Jennings Oil Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
See Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211, 1218-19 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1572, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8535 Ronald Prate, Leonard Larosa, Patricia Plumeri, Patricia A. Doyle, Theresa Young, Terrence P. Anderson, Michael A. Digiovanni, Gary Gennarino, Michael O. Keller, Charles J. Zona, Joseph P. Tantalo, Michael Perry, and Samuel T. Germano v. Elisha Freedman, City Manager of the City of Rochester, N. Y., Thomas Hastings, Chief of Police of the City of Rochester Police Department, Members of the County of Monroe Civil Service Commission, and Executive Director of the County of Monroe Civil Service Commission, and John Howard, Johnny L. Smith, and John Wyche, Defendants-Intervenors- Ronald S. Zavaglia, Carol Tschiderer, and Thomas A. Tschiderer, Plaintiffs v. Elisha Freedman, City Manager of the City of Rochester, N. Y., Thomas Hastings, Chief of Police of the City of Rochester Police Department, Members of the County of Monroe Civil Service Commission, and Executive Director of the County of Monroe Civil Service Commission, and John Howard, Johnny L. Smith and John Wyche, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants
See Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); EEOC v. Local 638 . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Pacific Molasses Co. v. National Labor Relations Board Regional Office 15
See United States v. Bianco, 2 Cir. 1976, 534 F.2d 501, 507 , cert. denied, 1976, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 , suggesting that, in a cash expenditure case, proof of a likely taxable source does not suffice to relieve the prosecution of its duty to negate probable sources of non-taxable income.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Meyer Boulet
See United States v. Bianco, 2 Cir. 1976, 534 F.2d 501, 507 , cert. denied, 1976, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 , suggesting that, in a cash expenditure case, proof of a likely taxable source does not suffice to relieve the prosecution of its duty to negate probable sources of non-taxable income.
cited
Cited "see"
Prate v. Freedman
See Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); EEOC v. Local 638 . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angelo Costanzo
See United States v. Bianco, 534 F.2d 501, 506 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); Gatling v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 286 F.2d 139, 144 (4th Cir. 1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robbins Flooring, Inc. v. Federal Floors, Inc.
(2×)
See Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of America, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
T Equipment Corp. v. Massachusetts Laborers' District Council
See also Associated General Contractors, Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701, 529 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 72 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976) (enforcing- an arbitration award of damages where the employer violated the collective bargaining agreement’s subcontracting clause by hiring a subcontractor who had no contact with the union).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shaver v. Standard Oil Co.
See, e.g., Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of Am., Inc. (C.A3, 1975), 531 F.2d 1211 , 1217-1226, certiorari denied (1976), 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 ; Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp. (E.D.Pa.1984), 596 F.Supp. 62, 73-76 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Martyn C. Merritt
Moreover, the Government correctly argues that Merritt himself violated the plea agreement by refusing to make available prior to sentencing “all personal and corporate financial information requested by the Government.” A defendant may enforce a plea agreement that induces a guilty plea, Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 , 92 S.Ct. 495, 498 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971); United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1181 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990); howevér, a defendant who materially breaches a plea agreement may not claim its ben…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greene County Memorial Park v. Behm Funeral Homes, Inc.
See, Waldo v. North American Van Lines, Inc., 102 F.R.D. 807, 812 (W.D.Pa.1984); Waldo v. North American Van Lines, Inc., 669 F.Supp. 722, 727 (W.D.Pa.1987); see also, Ungar v. Dunkin Donuts of America, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211, 1223-24 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Helmsley
Mariani, 851 F.2d at 600 ; see also United States v. Bianco, 534 F.2d 501 , 511 n. 14 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J.F. White Contracting Company v. Local 103 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Council of Carpenters, 599 F.Supp. 1560 (D.Mass.1985), later proceeding, Local 33, United Bhd. of Carpenters (Blount Bros.), 289 NLRB No. 167 (July 29, 1988); see also Associated General Contractors v. International Union of Operating *530 Eng’rs Local 701, 529 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 72 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
As AMI acknowledges, the argument also requires evidence that "no factor other than the economic power of the seller explains this acceptance." A.M. at 35; see Fortner II, 429 U.S. at 618 n. 10, 97 S.Ct. at 867 n. 10; see also Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211, 1225 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976) (proof of acceptance of a burdensome or uneconomic offer of a "tied” product is some evidence of coercion, but such proof alone does not establish, prima facie, the coercion element of a tying claim.) Accepting the continued viability …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dominic Mariani
Id. (quoting Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. at 460 , 92 S.Ct. at 1664 ); see also United States v. Bianco, 534 F.2d 501 , 510-11 & n. 14 (2d Cir.) (the government was not barred from prosecuting defendant because it was able to demonstrate that it already knew everything relevant to its case prior to the defendant’s immunized testimony before a state grand jury), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 84 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Atkinson
(2×)
Compare United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654 (5th Cir.) cert. denied 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976) (none of valid objectives of inventory search require officers to play cassette tapes found in vehicle).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ungar
v.
Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.
v.
Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.
No. 75-1636.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.