green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“mutual antagonism' only exists where the acceptance of one party's defense will preclude the acquittal of the other”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Tran
mutual antagonism' only exists where the acceptance of one party's defense will preclude the acquittal of the other
discussed
Cited "see"
Messerschmidt v. United States
See In re Bergy, 596 F.2d 952, 960 (C.C.P.A.1979) (Rich, J.) (describing the three doors “which must be opened on the difficult path to patentability”), vacated on other grounds, Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 444 U.S. 1028 , 100 S.Ct. 700 , 62 L.Ed.2d 666 (1980). 1.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Debra A. Hartmann, Kenneth K. Kaenel, and John Scott Korabik
See United States v. Ziperstein, 601 F.2d 281, 285 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Electric Co. v. New York State Department of Labor
It sought to “preempt all state laws that relate to employee benefit plans and not just state laws which purport to regulate an area expressly covered by ERISA.” Wadsworth v. Whaland, 562 F.2d 70, 77 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 980 , 98 S.Ct. 1630 , 56 L.Ed.2d 72 (1978); see Pervel Indus., Inc. v. State of Connecticut Comm’n on Human Rights and Opportunities, 468 F.Supp. 490 (D.Conn.1978), aff'd, 603 F.2d 214 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980); Landro v. Glendenning Motorways, Inc., 625 F.2d 1344, 1351 (8th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Electric Company v. New York State Department Of Labor
It sought to "preempt all state laws that relate to employee benefit plans and not just state laws which purport to regulate an area expressly covered by ERISA." Wadsworth v. Whaland, 562 F.2d 70, 77 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 980 , 98 S.Ct. 1630 , 56 L.Ed.2d 72 (1978); see Pervel Indus., Inc. v. State of Connecticut Comm'n on Human Rights and Opportunities, 468 F.Supp. 490 (D.Conn.1978), aff'd, 603 F.2d 214 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980); Landro v. Glendenning Motorways, Inc., 625 F.2d 1344, 1351 (8th Cir.1980). 14 A state law "r…
discussed
Cited "see"
Siuslaw Concrete Construction Company v. State Of Washington
Pacific Legal Foundation v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission, 659 F.2d 903, 919 (9th Cir.1981), aff'd, 461 U.S. 190 , 103 S.Ct. 1713 , 75 L.Ed.2d 752 (1982); see Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations, 453 F.Supp. 75, 78 (E.D.Wis.1978), aff'd, 599 F.2d 205 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980), for a discussion of Supreme Court decisions in this area.
discussed
Cited "see"
Waukesha Engine Division v. Department of Industry
See Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations, 599 F.2d 205, 208-210 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980); Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations, 87 Wis.2d 56, 72-73 , 273 N.W.2d 786, 793-795 (Ct.App.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John W. Sliker, John Carbone, and Theodore Buchwald, A/K/A \Bucky
See United States v. Ziperstein, 601 F.2d 281, 294 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980); see also Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 67 , 100 S.Ct. 2531, 2540 , 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980) (firmly rooted hearsay exceptions establish reliability sufficiently for Sixth Amendment purposes).
cited
Cited "see"
Wootten v. Askew
See, Barton v. Alpine Investments, Okl., 596 P.2d 532 (1979), cert. den. 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dawson v. Whaland
See Pervel Industries, Inc. v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 468 F.Supp. 490 (D.Conn.1978), aff'd mem., 603 F.2d 214 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Hardy
Thus, “[antagonistic defenses do not per se require severance, even if the defendants are hostile or attempt to cast the blame on each other.” (United States v. Becker (4th Cir. 1978) 585 F.2d 703, 707 , cert. den. 439 U.S. 1080 [ 59 L.Ed.2d 50 , 99 S.Ct. 862 ].) “Rather, to obtain severance on the ground of conflicting defenses, it must be demonstrated that the conflict is so prejudicial that [the] defenses are irreconcilable, and the jury will unjustifiably infer that this conflict alone demonstrates that both are guilty.” (United States v. Davis (1st Cir. 1980) 623 F.2d 188, 194-195…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kelvin Hasting, Gable Gibson, Napolean Stewart, Gregory Williams, and Kevin Wendall Anderson
See also United States v. Ziperstein, 601 F.2d 281, 285 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
After this Court’s decision in Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 451 U. S. 504 (1981), the Court of Appeals granted rehearing and returned to its Pervel reasoning, holding that Alessi was a “doctrinal development,” see Hicks v. Miranda, 422 U. S., at 344-345 , that warranted departure from the precedent set by the Court’s summary dispositions. 666 F. 2d, at 25-26 . 12 See Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. State, supra; Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Commissioner of Labor & Industry, supra; see also Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relatio…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gordon v. Matthew Bender & Co., Inc.
See also Bucyrus-Erie Company v. Dept. of Industry, Labor, 599 F.2d 205 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980) (complaint that company’s benefit plan is sex discriminatory; Wisconsin Fair Employment Act barring sex discrimination would be preempted by ERISA but for saving clause, § 1144(d), exempting from ERISA preemption state statutes which would affect other federal statutes, such as Title VII; court *1293 accepts expansive view of ERISA preemption based on broad language of statute and clear legislative history favoring preemption).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. Bd. of Ed. of Romeo Community Schools
(2×)
Compare Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations, 599 F.2d 205 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980) (rejecting preemption of state fair employment law as it applies to employee benefit plans) with Pervel v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, 468 F.Supp. 490 (D.Conn. 1978), aff’d. 603 F.2d 214 (2nd Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1031 , 100 S.Ct. 701 , 62 L.Ed.2d 667 (1980) (holding ERISA preempts Connecticut’s fair employment law as it applies to benefit plans).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fungaroli
v.
Fungaroli
v.
Fungaroli
No. 79-492.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 14, 1980.
444 U.S. 1031
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)
Appeal from Ct. App. N. C. Motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted.