green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.1 score
“state of illinois”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Karen D. Peters, Cross-Appellants v. The City of Shreveport, Cross-Appellee
But see Spaulding v. University of Washington, 740 F.2d 686, 709 (9th Cir.) (“even where the female faculty members are able to frame a cognizable Title VII or Equal Pay Act claim, it does not allow the male [faculty members] ‘to bootstrap their job grievances ... into an employment discrimination claim rooted in federal law.’ ”) (quoting Ruffin v. County of Los Angeles, 607 F.2d 1276, 1281 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1600 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1979)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S.Ct. 511 , 83 L.Ed.2d 401 (1984).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cmc Real Estate Corporation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Iowa Interstate Railroad, Ltd., Patrick W. Simmons, Intervenors. Cmc Real Estate Corporation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Iowa Interstate Railroad, Ltd., Patrick W. Simmons, Intervenors
state of illinois
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
The Menominee Tribe of Indians, and Cross-Appellees v. The United States, and Cross-Appellant
menominee basic
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Stewart v. National Shopmen Pension Fund
Ct. 1599, 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
LeBeau v. United States
See Menominee Tribe v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 506 , 607 F.2d 1335, 1344 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 950 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980) (distinguishing between an action for a breach of trust based solely on the enactment of a valid statute and actions for breaches of trust resulting from the actions of government officials in violation of a valid statute).
cited
Cited "see"
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States
See Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 445 U.S. 950 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980) (table) (denying certiorari).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Confederated Tribes Of The Colville Reservation v. United States
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. 221 , 240 n. 9 (1986) ("It is clear that the existence of a law in itself is not a defense to a clause 5 claim."); see Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 607 F.2d 1335, 1341 , 221 Ct.Cl. 506 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 950 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980); Seminole Nation v. United States, 492 F.2d 811 , 821 n. 11, 203 Ct.Cl. 637 (1974). 56 The Claims Court erred in its conclusion that a navigational servitude is unquestionably dominant over other concerns, including a "fair and honorable dealings" cause of action, and b…
discussed
Cited "see"
Confederated Tribes of Colville Reservation v. United States
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. 221 , 240 n. 9 (1986) (“It is clear that the existence of a law in itself is not a defense to a clause 5 claim.”); see Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 607 F.2d 1335, 1341 , 221 Ct.Cl. 506 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 950 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980); Seminole Nation v. United States, 492 F.2d 811 , 821 n. 11, 203 Ct.Cl. 637 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
McLaughlin v. Lindemann
First, it provided, with some minor exceptions, that an employee’s right to his normal retirement benefit is nonforfeitable upon the attainment of normal retirement age. 29 U.S.C. § 1053 (a); see Fremont v. McGraw-Edison Co., 606 F.2d 752, 757-58 (7th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980); Winer v. Edison Bros.
cited
Cited "see"
Ann McLaughlin Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. Oscar C. Lindemann, Roy A. Herberger, Trustee of the Lee Optical and Associated Companies Pension Plan v. Theodore Shanbaum
Sec. 1053 (a); see Fremont v. McGraw-Edison Co., 606 F.2d 752, 757-58 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980); Winer v. Edison Bros.
cited
Cited "see"
James A. Dooley Assoc. Emp. Ret. Plan v. Reynolds
See Fremont v. McGraw-Edison Co., 606 F.2d 752, 759 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Samuel M. Feinberg Testamentary Trust v. Carter
(2×)
Plaintiffs apparently believe that shareholders might have been unwill- ing to adopt the anti-greenmail amendment if Goodrich had disclosed that the availability of greenmail payments might encourage individuals such as Icahn to accumulate large blocks of Goodrich stock, a process which could culminate in a takeover attempt and an increase in the market price of Goodrich stock. “[T]he difficult question of materiality should not ordinarily be disposed of on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.” Joyce v. Joyce Beverages, Inc., 571 F.2d 703, 707 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 437 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 3092 , 57 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Guidry v. National Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund
See Fremont v. McGraw-Edison Co., 606 F.2d 752 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980); Winer v. Edison Brothers Stores Pension Plan, 593 F.2d 307 (8th Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Evers v. County of Custer
See Ruffin v. County of Los Angeles, 607 F.2d 1276, 1279 (9th Cir.1979), cert, denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1600 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Carole K. Evers, an Individual, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. The County of Custer Clyde Rigby, Custer County Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees-Cross Thurlo H. French and Dorothy French, Counterclaimants-Appellees v. Carole K. Evers, an Individual, Counterdefendant-Appellant
See Ruffin v. County of Los Angeles, 607 F.2d 1276, 1279 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1600 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leonard Thornton and William Carothers, Etc. v. James E. Evans
See Fremont v. McGraw-Edison Co., 606 F.2d 752, 759 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980); Freund v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank, 485 F.Supp. 629, 641-42 (W.D.Wis.1979). 43 .
cited
Cited "see"
Cohen v. Martin's
See Fremont v. McGraw-Edison Co., 606 F.2d 752 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Leff v. Cip Corp.
See Weisberg v. Coastal States Gas Corp., 609 F.2d 650, 654 (2d Cir. 1979), cert, denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1600 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980); Gaines v. Haughton, supra, 645 F.2d at 776 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Don Ray Smith v. Cmta-Iam Pension Trust
(2×)
See Fremont v. McGraw-Edison Company, 606 F.2d 752, 755, 758 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 ; accord, Giler v. Board of Sheet Metal Workers of So.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States
The obvious differences between clauses 1 and 5 of section 2 indicate that the lack of an “authorizing document” was not “intended to be dispositive of a fair and honorable dealings claim.” Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, 964 F.2d 1102 at 1113 ; see also Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 506, 515 , 607 F.2d 1335, 1341 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 950 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980); Seminole Nation v. United States, 203 Ct.Cl. 637, 643 , 492 F.2d 811 , 821 n. 11 (1974); Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. 221 , 240 n. 9…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Field v. Trump
Compare Maldonado, 597 F.2d at 796 (criticizing use of Section 14(a) to redress mismanagement and breaches of fiduciary duty), with Weisberg v. Coastal States Gas Corp., 609 F.2d 650 , 655 (2d Cir.1979) (distinguishing Maldonado in light of “allegations of a cover-up of massive bribes and of kickbacks to directors”), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1600 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Field v. Trump
Compare Maldonado, 597 F.2d at 796 (criticizing use of Section 14(a) to redress mismanagement and breaches of fiduciary duty), with Weisberg v. Coastal States Gas Corp., 609 F.2d 650, 655 (2d Cir.1979) (distinguishing Maldonado in light of "allegations of a cover-up of massive bribes and of kickbacks to directors"), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1600 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States
See, e.g., Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 506, 515 , 607 F.2d 1335, 1341 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 950 , 100 S.Ct. 1599 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980); Sioux Nation, 207 Ct.Cl. 234 , 518 F.2d 1298 ; Seminole Nation, 203 Ct.Cl. 637 , 492 F.2d 811 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Margaret Spaulding, and James Bush, Intervenors-Appellants v. University of Washington
(2×)
See, e.g., Pearce v. Wichita County, 590 F.2d 128 (5th Cir.1979); Marshall v. City of Sheboygan, 577 F.2d 1 (7th Cir.1978); see also Ruffin v. County of Los Angeles, 607 F.2d 1276 , 1282 n. 3 (9th Cir.1979) (declining to decide issue), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1600 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brayton v. Ostrau
See, e.g., Weisberg v. Coastal States Gas Corp., 609 F.2d 650, 654 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1600 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980); Kamerman v. Pakco Companies, Inc., supra, at 93,066 (“Section 14 cannot be interpreted so expansively as to provide for recovery for activities which were not the subjects of the proxy solicitation.”); Limmer v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp., [1977-78 Transfer Binder] Fed.Sec.L.Rep. ¶ 96,111 (S.D.N.Y.1977); Levy v. Johnson, [1976-1977 Transfer Binder] Fed.Sec.L.Rep. ¶ 95,899 (S.D.N.Y.1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lyles
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 79-1207.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1) · Federal Circuit (1)
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Cer-tiorari denied.