green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.5 score
“ne can capitalize on a market or fad created by another provided that it is not accomplished by confusing the public into mistakenly purchasing the product in the belief that the product is the product of the competitor.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Circuit Breaker Litigation
unlike a copyright, mere reproduction of a trademark is not an infringement.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina v. Helpingstine
ne can capitalize on a market or fad created by another provided that it is not accomplished by confusing the public into mistakenly purchasing the product in the belief that the product is the product of the competitor.
cited
Cited "see"
E.G.L. Gem Lab Ltd. v. Gem Quality Institute, Inc.
See American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co. Ltd., 609 F.2d 655, 661 (2d Cir.1979). ce rt. denied 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); 3 Mccarthy § 23:10, at 23-28. 127 .
cited
Cited "see"
Becherer v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
See Jackson v. Hayakawa, 605 F.2d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980). .
cited
Cited "see"
Clinique Laboratories, Inc. v. Dep Corp.
See American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., 609 F.2d 655, 664 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980) (New York common law).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Duffy
See, Commonwealth v. Klobuchir, 486 Pa. 241 , 405 A.2d 881 (1979), cert. denied 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1602 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980) (for double jeopardy purposes, jeopardy attaches in a bench trial when the court begins to hear evidence). .
discussed
Cited "see"
The Forschner Group, Inc. And Swiss Army Brands, Ltd. v. Arrow Trading Co. Inc.
See American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co. Ltd., 609 F.2d 655, 662 (2d Cir.1979) (unfair competition may consist of “confusing the public into mistakenly purchasing the product in the belief that the product is the product of the competitor”), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); see also Liquid Controls Corp. v. Liquid Control Corp., 802 F.2d 934, 939 (7th Cir.1986) (unfair competition claim “might be supportable if consumer confusion or a likelihood of consumer confusion arose from the failure of the defendant to adequately identify itself as th…
cited
Cited "see"
W.W.W. Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. The Gillette Company
See American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co. Ltd., 609 F.2d 655 , 660 n. 4 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. Stouffer Corp.
See American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Corp., 609 F.2d 655, 662 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schwartz v. United States
See Jackson v. Hayakawa, 605 F.2d 1121, 1125 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980) (“[although damages are sought here, whereas declaratory relief was sought in [prior case], the issues are identical); Neale v. Goldberg, 525 F.2d 332, 332 (9th Cir.1975) (where judgment in state court for relief in addition to simple declaration of rights of parties, the judgment was res judicata as of same issues subsequently presented by complaint in district court).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wonder Labs, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co.
See American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., 609 F.2d 655, 662 (2d Cir.1979) (descriptive usage precluded conclusion of misappropriation), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Stephans v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
See Jackson v. Hayakawa, 605 F.2d 1121 , 1125-26 & n. 3 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pantone, Inc. v. Esselte Letraset Ltd.
See American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., 609 F.2d 655, 662 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); Davis & Co. Auto Parts, Inc. v. Allied Corp., 651 F.Supp. 198, 203 (S.D.N.Y.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
A.J. Canfield Co. v. Concord Beverage Co.
See American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., Ltd., 609 F.2d 655, 664 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); Blake Publishing Corp. v. O’Quinn Studios, Inc., 202 U.S.P.Q.
cited
Cited "see"
Rossner v. CBS, INC.
Accord, American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Corp., *340 609 F.2d 655, 663 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School District
(2×)
See Jackson v. Hayakawa, 605 F.2d 1121 , 1126 & n. 7 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); see also Johnson v. General Motors Corp., 598 F.2d 432, 434-35 (5th Cir. 1979). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., Nintendo of America, Inc.
See American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., 609 F.2d 655 , 661 n. 4 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); Dreyfus Fund Inc. v. Royal Bank of Canada, 525 F.Supp. 1108, 1116 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (“To be probative and meaningful ... surveys ... must rely upon responses by potential consumers of the products in question.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Unified School District v. Los Angeles Branch Naacp
See Jackson v. Hayakawa, 605 F.2d 1121 , 1126 & n. 7 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980) (giving res judicata effect to judgment against class never formally certified by California courts, but treated by them as a class action); see also Johnson v. General Motors Corp., 598 F.2d 432, 434-35 (5th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Beaver
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Klobuchir, 486 Pa. 241 , 405 A.2d 881 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1602 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 , reh. denied, 446 U.S. 947 , 100 S.Ct. 2178 , 64 L.Ed.2d 804 (1980). [5] The Majority Opinion in Wallace is not otherwise illuminating since a new trial was awarded on the basis that the prosecution failed to comply with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). [6] See Commonwealth v. Sample, 493 Pa. 347 , 426 A.2d 582 (1981) (Alleged violations of the double jeopardy clauses of both the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions were …
cited
Cited "see"
Aris-Isotoner Gloves, Inc. v. Fownes Bros. & Co.
See American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., 609 F.2d 655, 662 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Seiko Sporting Goods USA, Inc. v. Kabushiki Kaisha Hattori Tokeiten
See American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., 609 F.2d 655, 663 (2d Cir. 1979), cert, denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980) and cases cited.
discussed
Cited "see"
Coca-Cola Co. v. Tropicana Products, Inc.
See American Footwear Corporation v. General Footwear Company Limited, 609 F.2d 655 , 660 & n.4 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); McNeilab, Inc. v. American Home Products Corporation, 501 F.Supp. 517, 525-9 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (Lasker, J.); American Home Products Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson, 436 F.Supp. 785, 792-4 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (Stewart, J.), aff’d, 577 F.2d 160 (2d Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Bratton v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
See Jackson v. Hayakawa, 605 F.2d 1121, 1127 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
SEKAQUAPTEWA v. MacDONALD
See Jackson v. Hayakawa, 605 F.2d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 . 21 There is no dispute over the fact that the 1965 Survey correctly established the boundary lines as they had been described by the 1882 Executive Order.
cited
Cited "see"
Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald
See Jackson v. Hayakawa, 605 F.2d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 .
discussed
Cited "see"
26 Fair empl.prac.cas. 783, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,290, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,000
See Jackson v. Hayakawa, 605 F.2d 1121, 1127 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980) 3 Several district courts within this circuit have considered the issue of which California statute of limitations governs section 1981 actions.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lebas Fashion Imports of USA, Inc. v. ITT Hartford Insurance Group
But the precise difference is not often material, since the law affords protection against . . . appropriation [of either] . . . upon the same fundamental principles’’]; see also Accuride Int., Inc. v. Accuride Corp. (9th Cir. 1989) 871 F.2d 1531, 1534-1535 [trademark and trade name protections are governed by the same test of infringement and serve the same basic purpose].) 12 As one court put it, “A claim of trademark infringement is but a part of the broader claim of unfair competition. [Citation.] Thus, while [a mark] may be generic and not entitled to trademark protection, [a] claim…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Willie Enoch v. Richard Gramley, Warden, Pontiac Correctional Center
See, e.g., People v. Lykins, 77 Ill.2d 35 , 31 Ill.Dec. 805, 807 , 394 N.E.2d 1182, 1184 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1602 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); People v. Precup, 73 Ill.2d 7 , 21 Ill.Dec. 863, 867 , 382 N.E.2d 227, 231 (1978); People v. Gilbert, 68 Ill.2d 252 , 12 Ill.Dec. 142 , 369 N.E.2d 849 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coors Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.
Otherwise described, “The New York law of unfair competition ... bans ‘any form of commercial immorality.’ A cause of action for unfair competition requires unfairness and an unjustifiable attempt to profit from another’s expenditure of time, labor and talent....” Roy Export Co. Establishment Etc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 503 F.Supp. 1137, 1151-52 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 672 F.2d 1095 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); see also American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., 609 F.2d 655, 662 (2d Cir.1979) (“One cannot sel…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schwinn Bicycle Co. v. Ross Bicycles, Inc.
See, e.g., American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., 609 F.2d 655 , 661-62 n. 4 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); Sunbeam Corp. v. Equity Industries Corp., 635 F.Supp. 625 (E.D.Va.1986), aff'd, 811 F.2d 1505 (4th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yarmuth-Dion, Inc., Peter Dion, Inc., and Peter Dion v. D'Ion Furs, Inc.
See, e.g., American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., 609 F.2d 655, 663 (2d Cir.1979) (“The crucial question in a case involving ‘secondary meaning’ always is whether the public is moved in any degree to buy an article because of its source.”) (emphasis supplied), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Motown Productions, Inc. v. Cacomm, Inc.
Compare American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., 609 F.2d 655, 663 (2d Cir.1979) (finding survey results insufficient to establish secondary meaning), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brennan v. EMDE Medical Research, Inc.
See also Jackson v. Hayakawa, 605 F.2d 1121 (9th Cir.1979) cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); Renfro v. Forman, 99 Nev. 70 , 657 P.2d 1151 (1983) (discussing motion to dismiss).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Greetings Corp. v. Dan-Dee Imports, Inc.
See, e.g., American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., 609 F.2d 655 , 661 n. 4 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980), citing American Luggage Works, Inc. v. United States Trunk Co., 158 F.Supp. 50, 53 (D.Mass.1957), aff'd, 259 F.2d 69 (1st Cir. 1958).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co.
See also American Footwear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., Ltd., 609 F.2d 655, 663 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980) (citing United Drug).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Henri's Food Products Company, Inc., Counterdefendant-Appellee v. Kraft, Inc., Counterplaintiff-Appellant
(2×)
See also Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Proctor & Gamble Co., 434 F.2d 794 , 802 (9th Cir.1970). “[W]hen a company causes the public to associate a certain word with that company’s business, that word has a secondary meaning and receives the full protection of the law of trademark and unfair competition.” American Footwear Corporation v. General Footwear Company Limited, 609 F.2d 655, 663 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Gibraltar Financial Corporation of California, and Gibraltar Savings & Loan Association
See, e.g., American Foot Wear Corp. v. General Footwear Co., 609 F.2d 655, n.4 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980) (trial court properly excluded survey which contained self-serving questions and which failed to duplicate actual marketing conditions).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Plummer
v.
Klepak, Chairman, Drug Abuse Control Commission of New York
v.
Klepak, Chairman, Drug Abuse Control Commission of New York
No. 79-1293.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1980.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.