green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Woodbury Baker, United States of America v. Timothy Blackwell
(2×)
See Levy, 703 F.2d at 794 n. 9 (raising possibility of utilizing procedure but finding it inappropriate in that case based on government’s misconduct) (citing United States v. Burns, 624 F.2d 95, 105 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980)).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Election Commission v. National Republican Senatorial Committee
See Martin Tractor Co. v. FEC, 627 F.2d 375, 384-85 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 360 , 66 L.Ed.2d 218 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
cadc 1990
See United States v. Burns, 624 F.2d 95, 104 (10th Cir.) ("the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's inference that these appellants possessed cocaine with an intent to distribute, but the jury was free also not to draw such an inference. [The appellants] were entitled to a jury consideration of the offense of simple possession"), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980). 32 The rationale for giving the lesser-included offense instruction is both logical and appealing: 33 [w]here one of the elements of the offense charged remains in doubt, but the defendant is…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gibbs
See United States v. Burns, 624 F.2d 95, 104 (10th Cir.) (“the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s inference that these appellants possessed cocaine with an intent to distribute, but the jury was free also not to draw such an inference. [The appellants] were entitled to a jury consideration of the offense of simple possession”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Faucher v. Federal Election Commission
See Martin Tractor Co. v. Federal Election Commission, 627 F.2d 375, 378 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 360 , 66 L.Ed.2d 218 (1980) (no hardship to parties from deferring judgment pending FEC advisory opinion); Mott v. Federal Election Commission, 494 F.Supp. 131, 135 (D.D.C.1980) (issue unripe until issuance of FEC advisory opinion).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Enrique Espinosa
See United States v. Burns, 624 F.2d 95, 104 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Falcon Construction Company, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellant v. Economy Forms Corporation, Defendant-Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee
See Midland Telecasting Company v. Midessa Television Co., Inc., 617 F.2d 1141 , 1144 n. 5 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Olson v. Bradrick
See Milos v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., 478 F.Supp. 1019, 1021 (S.D.N.Y. 1979), aff'd mem., 622 F.2d 574 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 360 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Canterbury Riding Condominium v. Chesapeake Investors, Inc.
See Rothenberg v. Security Management Co., 617 F.2d 1149, 1150 (5th Cir.1980) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 359 , 66 L.Ed.2d 218 ; Gumer v. Shearson, Hamill & Co., 516 F.2d 283 (2d Cir.1974); Schwartz v. Compagnie Gen.
cited
Cited "see"
ca11 1983
See Rothenberg v. Security Management Co., 617 F.2d 1149, 1150 (5th Cir.), rehearing denied, 623 F.2d 711 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 359 , 66 L.Ed.2d 218 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Consultants & Designers, Inc. v. Butler Service Group, Inc.
See Rothenberg v. Security Management Co., 617 F.2d 1149, 1150 (5th Cir.), rehearing denied, 623 F.2d 711 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 359 , 66 L.Ed.2d 218 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Chicago Area v. Kempiners
See Martin Tractor Co. v. Federal Election Commission, 627 F.2d 375, 380 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 360 , 66 L.Ed.2d 218 (1980); National Student Association v. Hershey, 412 F.2d 1103, 1110-15 (D.C.Cir.1969); Spartacus Youth League v. Board of Trustees of Illinois Industrial University, 502 F.Supp. 789, 796-97 (N.D.Ill.1980); 13 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Planned Parenthood Association Of Chicago Area v. William L. Kempiners
See Martin Tractor Co. v. Federal Election Commission, 627 F.2d 375, 380 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 360 , 66 L.Ed.2d 218 (1980); National Student Association v. Hershey, 412 F.2d 1103, 1110-15 (D.C.Cir.1969); Spartacus Youth League v. Board of Trustees of Illinois Industrial University, 502 F.Supp. 789, 796-97 (N.D.Ill.1980); 13 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Christopher Beale
See last part of note 20, infra, and Solis, 536 F.2d at 883 ("There was no embarrassment to or search of the person.") 20 To the extent that United States v. Burns, 624 F.2d 95, 101 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980); United States v. Sullivan, 625 F.2d 9, 12-13 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1374 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981); and United States v. Goldstein, 635 F.2d 356, 360-62 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 962 , 101 S.Ct. 3111 , 69 L.Ed.2d 972 (1981), depart from this unstated rationale, we decline to follow them.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Ohio Elections Commission
See, e.g., Martin Tractor Co. v. Federal Election Comm’n, 627 F.2d 375, 380 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 360 , 66 L.Ed.2d 218 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
El Dia, Inc. v. Rafael Hernandez Colon
See, e.g., Martin Tractor Co. v. Federal Election Comm’n, 627 F.2d 375, 380 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 360 , 66 L.Ed.2d 218 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gartner v. United States Information Agency
See, e.g., Martin Tractor Co. v. Federal Election Comm’n, 627 F.2d 375 (D.C.Cir.) (first amendment action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against election laws held nonjusticiable because there is no threat of enforcement), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 360 , 66 L.Ed.2d 218 (1980); St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Benny Carl Lovell
As we noted in Goldstein , “[i]t is undisputed that, had one of the DEA agents through the use of his olfactory sense detected the odor of the controlled substances in the suitcases, a search would not have occurred.” Id. at 361 (quoting United States v. Sullivan, 625 F.2d 9, 13 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1374 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981)); see also United States v. Burns, 624 F.2d 95, 101 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 361 , 66 L.Ed.2d 219 (1980); United States v. Solis, 536 F.2d 880, 881 (9th Cir.1976) (“Generally evidence acquired by unaided…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Habbena
It is clear, however, that “[w]hen a logical nexus exists between seized but unnamed *457 items and those items listed in the warrant, the unnamed items are admissible.” United States v. Gentry, 642 F.2d 385, 387 (10th Cir.1981); see also United States v. Williams, 623 F.2d 535 (8th Cir.) cert. denied 449 U.S. 954 , 101 S.Ct. 359 , 66 L.Ed.2d 218 (1980).
Silverman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-334.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 1980.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.