green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Miller v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp.
See Maehren v. City of Seattle, 92 Wash.2d 480, 488 , 599 P.2d 1255 (1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3079 , 69 L.Ed.2d 951 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Miller v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp.
See Maehren v. City of Se attle, 92 Wn.2d 480, 488 , 599 P.2d 1255 (1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S. Ct. 3079 , 69 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Hill v. Department of Transportation
See Maehren v. Seattle, 92 Wn.2d 480, 488 , 599 P.2d 1255 (1979) (the admission or refusal of evidence lies largely within the trial court’s sound discretion), ce rt. denied, 452 U.S. 938 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Aiken v. City of Memphis
See Detroit Police Officers’ Ass’n v. Young, 608 F.2d 671 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3079 , 69 L.Ed.2d 951 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
ca6 1994
See Detroit Police Officers' Ass'n v. Young, 608 F.2d 671 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3079 , 69 L.Ed.2d 951 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
D'Errico v. General Dynamics Corp.
See Prolerized New England Co. v. Benefits Review Bd., 637 F.2d 30 , 40-41 (1st Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3080 , 69 L.Ed.2d 952 (1981) 3 Section 8(c)(20) of the Act provides that "[p]roper and equitable compensation not to exceed $7,500 shall be awarded for serious disfigurement of the face, head, or neck or of other normally exposed areas likely to handicap the employee in securing or maintaining employment." 33 U.S.C. § 908 (c)(20).
cited
Cited "see"
D'Errico v. General Dynamics Corp.
See Prolerized New England Co. v. Benefits Review Bd., 637 F.2d 30 , 40-41 (1st Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3080 , 69 L.Ed.2d 952 (1981). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Seneca-Cayuga Tribe v. Oklahoma ex rel. Thompson
See Currey v. Corporation Comm’n, 617 P.2d 177, 179-80 (Okla.1980) (disclaimer is one of proprietary interest in Indian lands), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3080 , 69 L.Ed.2d 952 (1981); see also Organized Village of Kake v. Egan, 369 U.S. 60, 69 , 82 S.Ct. 562, 567-68 , 7 L.Ed.2d 573 (1961) (construing Alaskan disclaimer as proprietary rather than governmental); Ahboah v. Housing Auth. of the Kiowa Tribe of Indians, 660 P.2d 625, 630 (Okla.1983) (confirming Currey).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca10 1989
See Currey v. Corporation Comm'n, 617 P.2d 177, 179-80 (Okla.1980) (disclaimer is one of proprietary interest in Indian lands), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3080 , 69 L.Ed.2d 952 (1981); see also Organized Village of Kake v. Egan, 369 U.S. 60, 69 , 82 S.Ct. 562, 567-68 , 7 L.Ed.2d 573 (1961) (construing Alaskan disclaimer as proprietary rather than governmental); Ahboah v. Housing Auth. of the Kiowa Tribe of Indians, 660 P.2d 625, 630 (Okla.1983) (confirming Currey ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Herbert L. Crawford v. The College Life Insurance Company of America, Baldwin-United Leasing Corporation
See Detroit Police Officers' Ass'n v. Young, 608 F.2d 671, 693-94 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 (1981); Meschino v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 563 F. Supp. 1066, 1072 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). 16 At the second level, Turner's alleged report of the Buis statements, the state of mind exception is not applicable, for the relevant state of mind is that of Buis, not that of Turner, but we think they were properly admissible as an admission by an adverse party. 17 Turner was the Director of Special Markets for College Life.
discussed
Cited "see"
Valentine v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, ETC.
See generally Detroit Police Officers Association v. Young, 608 F.2d 671 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3079 , 69 L.Ed.2d 951 (1981); Jurgens v. Norton, 22 FEP Cases 1738 (N.D.Tex.1980); Baker v. City of Detroit, 483 F.Supp. 930 (E.D.Mich.1979); Tangren v. Wackenhut Services, Inc., 480 F.Supp. 539 (D.Nev.1979); 2 Larson, Employment Discrimination §§ 57.00-57.68 (1981 ed.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Valentine v. Drug Enforcement Administration of the United States Department of Justice
See generally Detroit Police Officers Association v. Young, 608 F.2d 671 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3079 , 69 L.Ed.2d 951 (1981); Jurgens v. Norton, 22 FEP Cases 1738 (N.D.Tex.1980); Baker v. City of Detroit, 483 F.Supp. 930 (E.D.Mich.1979); Tangren v. Wackenhut Services, Inc., 480 F.Supp. 539 (D.Nev.1979); 2 Larson, Employment Discrimination §§ 57.00-57.68 (1981 ed.).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. City of Miami
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Detroit Police Officers’ Ass’n v. Young, 608 F.2d 671, 696 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3079 , 69 L.Ed.2d 951 (1981). 23 The contract modifies the City’s legislative power to amend its ordinance but such a contract appears to be valid under Florida law.
cited
Cited "see"
Graziano v. General Dynamics Corp.
See Prolerized New England Co. v. Benefits Review Board, 637 F.2d 30, 35-38 (1st Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3080 , 69 L.Ed.2d 952 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eric F. Saltzman and Victoria M. Saltzman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Arnold Saltzman and Joan Saltzman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Read together, the case and the Rule stand for the proposition that “[a] de-clarant’s out-of-court statement of intent may be introduced to prove that the declarant acted in accordance with that intent.” United States v. Delvecchio, 816 F.2d 859, 863 (2d Cir.1987); see United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 239 (2d Cir.1990); United States v. Badalamenti, 794 F.2d 821, 826 (2d Cir.1986); see also Detroit Police Officers’ Ass’n v. Young, 608 F.2d 671, 693-94 (6th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3079 , 69 L.Ed.2d 951 (1981); Fed.R.Evid. 803(24).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michigan Road Builders Association, Inc. v. William G. Milliken
(2×)
See also Detroit Police Officers’ Ass’n v. Young, 608 F.2d 671 (6th Cir.1979) (determining that no “direct showing of past intentional discrimination” by the governmental unit imposing the affirmative action plan was necessary and that the plan need only be a “reasonable” means of serving the governmental interest of eradicating the effects of past discrimination), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3079 , 69 L.Ed.2d 951 (1981); Ohio Contractors Ass’n v. Keip, 713 F.2d 167 (6th Cir.1983) (where compelling interest of state in ameliorating the past effects of its prior discrim…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1982
See, e.g., Detroit Police Officers' Ass'n v. Young, 608 F.2d 671, 688-90 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3079 , 69 L.Ed.2d 951 (1981); Baker v. City of Detroit, 483 F.Supp. 930, 983-86 , 986 n.105 (E.D.Mich.1979); Chmill v. City of Pittsburgh, 488 Pa. 470, 487-90 , 412 A.2d 860, 869-71 (1980); Price v. Civil Serv.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
La Riviere v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
See, e.g., Detroit Police Officers’ Ass’n v. Young, 608 F.2d 671, 688-90 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 3079 , 69 L.Ed.2d 951 (1981); Baker v. City of Detroit, 483 F.Supp. 930, 983-86 , 986 n.105 (E.D.Mich.1979); Chmill v. City of Pittsburgh, 488 Pa. 470, 487-90 , 412 A.2d 860, 869-71 (1980); Price v. Civil Serv.
Bendetti
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-1615.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 15, 1981.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.