Elkins v. United States, 453 U.S. 912 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Elkins v. United States, 453 U.S. 912 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“e are aware of no authority suggesting that a transfer to a facility not easily accessible to a prisoner's relatives ... necessarily implicates liberty interests protected by the due process clause.”
121 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Persico v. Gunnell (nysd, 1983-03-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Persico v. Gunnell (2×) also: Cited "see"
S.D.N.Y. · 1983 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
e are aware of no authority suggesting that a transfer to a facility not easily accessible to a prisoner's relatives ... necessarily implicates liberty interests protected by the due process clause.
discussed Cited "see" the Texas Education Agency and Mike Morath, Commissioner of Education, in His Official Capacity v. Academy of Careers and Technologies, Inc. D/B/A Academy of Careers and Technologies Charter School
Tex. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beshaw v. Fenton, 635 F.2d 239, 246-247 (CA3 1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 3145 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981); Cofone v. Manson, 594 F.2d 934, 937, n. 4 (CA2 1979); Sisbarro v. Warden, 592 F.2d 1, 3 (CA1), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 849 , 100 S.Ct. 99 , 62 L.Ed.2d 64 (1979); Fletcher v. Warden, 467 F.Supp. 777, 779-780 (Kan.1979); Curry-Bey v. Jackson, 422 F.Supp. 926, 931-933 (DC 1976); McDonnell v. United States Attorney General, 420 F.Supp. 217, 220 (ED Ill.1976); Goodnow v. Perrin, 120 N.H. 669, 671 , 421 A.2d 1008, 1010 (1980); Girouard v. Hogan, 135 Vt. 448, 449-450 , 378 A.2d …
discussed Cited "see" Kelley v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See and Compare, Bell v. State, 582 S.W.2d 800 (Tex.Cr.App.1979), cert. denied 453 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 3145 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981); Curtis v. ) State, 519 S.W.2d 883 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Ex Parte Guerrero, 521 S.W.2d 613 (Tex.Cr.App.1975).
discussed Cited "see" Snider v. Lone Star Art Trading Co., Inc.
E.D. Mich. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sutton, 642 F.2d 1001, 1007 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 3143 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981) (en banc) (“The use of the term ‘any’ before ‘enterprise’ helps to make clear that ‘enterprise’ is used in an all encompassing sense”).
discussed Cited "see" Bell v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bell v. State, 582 S.W.2d 800 (Tex.Cr.App.1979), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 3145 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981), reh. denied, 453 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 889 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sam Qaoud Evan H. Callanan, Sr. Evan H. Callanan, Jr.
6th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sutton, 642 F.2d 1001, 1040 (6th Cir.1979) (en banc), (“It is apparent to us that §§ 1962 and 1962(d) [the RICO conspiracy and substantive offense provisions] under the holdings of Iannelli, [supra ] ... validate the indictment of these appellants under both sections”), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 3143 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981).
cited Cited "see" Griffin v. O'Neal, Jones & Feldman, Inc.
S.D. Ohio · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sutton, 642 F.2d 1001, 1008 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 3143 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" William Corgain v. H.G. Miller and Norman Carlson, Joe Ortega v. H.G. Miller, Warden and Norman Carlson, Arthur St. Peter v. H.G. Miller, Warden, Kenneth Duane Agtuca v. Harold G. Miller, Anthony J. Souza v. Harold Miller, Warden, Ronald Orville Piercy v. Harold G. Miller, Albert Little v. Harold G. Miller, Warden, Lester M. Askofu Johnson v. H.G. Miller
7th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fletcher v. Warden, 641 F.2d 850 , 852 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 3145 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981); cf. Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480, 486-87 , 100 S.Ct. 1254, 1260 , 63 L.Ed.2d 552 (1980) (case not moot when petitioner was in fact under threat of being transferred again under allegedly unconstitutional procedures) 6 See supra note 5 7 In fact, it may be that no Delaware prisoner was a party in the consolidated cases.
discussed Cited "see" Corgain v. Miller
7th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fletcher v. Warden, 641 F.2d 850 , 852 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 3145 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981); cf. Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480, 486-87, 100 S.Ct. 1254, 1260 , 63 L.Ed.2d 552 (1980) (case not moot when petitioner was in fact under threat of being transferred again under allegedly unconstitutional procedures). .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. William Aubrey Thompson, Thomas Edward Sisk, Charles Frederick Taylor (2×)
6th Cir. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Sutton, 642 F.2d 1001, 1006 (6th Cir. 1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 3144 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lyon v. State
Tex. App. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
Tex.R.App.P. 74(f); see also Woods v. State, 569 S.W.2d 901, 905 (Tex.Crim.App.1978), cer t. denied, 453 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 3145 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981); Hicks v. State, 545 S.W.2d 805 (Tex.Crim.App.1977).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Peacock v. State
Tex. App. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bell v. State, 582 S.W.2d 800 (Tex.Crim.App.1979), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 3145 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981), rehr’g denied, 453 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 889 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1981).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Richard Angelo Calabrese and Carol Ann Calabrese, United States of America v. Terry A. Logan
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Sutton, 642 F.2d 1001, 1040 (6th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 3143 , 69 L.Ed.2d 995 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Elkins
v.
United States Hensley v. United States Sutton v. United States Harris v. United States Holmes v. United States Adams v. United States and Cravens v. United States
No. 80-6058; No. 80-6137; No. 80-6141; No. 80-6147; No. 80-6253; No. 80-6254; No. 80-6272.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 29, 1981.
453 U.S. 912
Cited by 25 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 642 F. 2d 1001.