Appalachian Power Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 454 U.S. 866 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Appalachian Power Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 454 U.S. 866 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[E]ven one substantial claim may be enough to support jurisdiction”
82 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 31 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. International Terminal Operating Co. (nysd, 1985-10-16) · Strongest negative: United States v. George M. Khoury, Howard Kluver, David W. West, Louis H. Chippas (ca11, 1990-06-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. George M. Khoury, Howard Kluver, David W. West, Louis H. Chippas
11th Cir. · 1990 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
United States v. Edmondson, 818 F.2d 768, 769 (11th Cir.1987) (per curiam); United States v. Rodriguez, 582 F.2d 1015, 1016 (5th Cir.1978) (per curiam); United States v. Gray, 464 F.2d 632 , 634 n. 1 (8th Cir.1972); United States v. Prince, 456 F.2d 1070, 1070-71 (5th Cir.1972); but cf. United States v. Taylor, 648 F.2d 565, 573 (9th Cir.) (non-jurisdictional rule of forbearance with extraordinary circumstances exception), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 866 , 102 S.Ct. 329 , 70 L.Ed.2d 168 (1981).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. International Terminal Operating Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
ven one substantial claim may be enough to support jurisdiction
cited Cited "see" United States v. Lawrence Simmons
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Taylor, 648 F.2d 565, 573 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 866 (1981); United States v. Hearst, 638 F.2d 1190, 1196 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 938 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Paredes-Moya
N.D. Tex. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Johnson, 645 F.2d 865, 867 (10th Cir.) (government entitled to learn all members and dimensions of conspiracy), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 866 , 102 S.Ct. 329 , 70 L.Ed.2d 168 (1981); United States v. Sandoval, 550 F.2d 427, 429-30 (9th Cir.1976) (government entitled to apprehend satellite members as well as major players), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 879 , 98 S.Ct. 234 , 54 L.Ed.2d 160 (1977); United States v. Baynes, 400 F.Supp. 285, 300 (E.D.Pa.1975) (government “not obliged to conclude its investigation because it obtains certain minimal or threshold evidence of a defendant�…
discussed Cited "see" Huang v. Shiu
N.D. Ill. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Uptown People’s Community Health Services v. Board of Comm'rs of Cook County, 647 F.2d 727, 739 (7th Cir.) ("it still is necessary that something be stated that apprises a defendant of the substance of the allegations”) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 866 , 102 S.Ct. 328 , 70 L.Ed.2d 167 (1981); U.S. General, Inc. v. City of Joliet, 598 F.2d 1050, 1053 (7th Cir.1979) ("Some understandable allegations, even if inartfully drawn, remain essential to any effort to formulate a recognizable issue for disposition on its merits.”).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mancari
N.D. Ill. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Johnson, 645 F.2d 865, 867 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, Ableidinger v. United States, 454 U.S. 866 , 102 S.Ct. 329 , 70 L.Ed.2d 168 (1981) (electronic surveillance justified where needed to identify all the conspirators and to determine precise nature and scope of the illegal activity).
cited Cited "see" Donald Richard Maghe v. United States
9th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Taylor, 648 F.2d 565, 573 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 866 , 102 S.Ct. 329 , 70 L.Ed.2d 168 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gloria Sladek v. Bell System Management Pension Plan
7th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also International Ass’n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers Local No. 111 v. Douglas, 646 F.2d 1211 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 866 , 102 S.Ct. 328 , 70 L.Ed.2d 166 (1981); In re Estate of Sheppard, 658 F.Supp. 729 , 734 n. 9 (C.D.Ill.1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kreml v. Diamond Shamrock Corp.
N.D. Ill. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
To the extent plaintiff intends this count as a common law claim for breach of contract, she has directly flouted this court’s ruling that such a claim is preempted by ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (a); see also Gors v. Venoy Palmer Market, Inc., 578 F.Supp. 365 (E.D.Mich.1984) (claim that employer breached the terms of its contract with employee as set forth in the summary description of an ERISA plan is subject to federal jurisdiction under § 1132(a)(1)(B) because the summary description might amend the rights of the employee under the plan), (relying on International Association of Bridge, St…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Appalachian Power Co.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 81-197.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
454 U.S. 866
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.