green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.1 score
“certainly no one would contend ... that the losing senators in any vote should automatically have the right to appeal to a federal court for a determination of the correctness of the result approved by a majority of their colleagues”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Moore v. United States House of Representatives
certainly no one would contend ... that the losing senators in any vote should automatically have the right to appeal to a federal court for a determination of the correctness of the result approved by a majority of their colleagues
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Yellowtail v. Little Horn State Bank
See McClure v. Carter, 513 F.Supp. 265, 271 (D.Idaho) (three judge court), (1981) aff'd without opinion, McClure v. Reagan, 454 U.S. 1025 , 102 S.Ct. 559 , 70 L.Ed.2d 469 (1981). 8 Thus, in order for a plaintiff to satisfy Article III in the context of 25 U.S.C. § 81 , he or she must allege a distinct injury fairly traceable to the contracts at issue and likely to be redressed by a decision in plaintiffs favor.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford v. Revlon, Inc.
(2×)
See Johnson v. Kerr-McGee Oil Industries, Inc., 129 Ariz. 393 , 631 P.2d 548 (App.) (the intentional injury exception does not apply even when the employer deliberately and intentionally exposes an employee to a known risk of harm), appeal dismissed, 454 U.S. 1025 , 102 S.Ct. 560 , 70 L.Ed.2d 469 (1981); accord Kofron v. Amoco Chemicals Corp., 441 A.2d 226 (Del. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. McPhee
(2×)
See In re Rabideau, 102 Wis.2d 16 , 306 N.W.2d 1 , appeal dismissed, 454 U.S. 1025 , 102 S.Ct. 559 , 70 L.Ed.2d 469 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Frick
(2×)
See Matter of Rabideau, 306 N.W.2d 1 , 102 Wis.2d 16 (1981), appeal dismissed 454 U.S. 1025 , 102 S.Ct. 559 , 70 L.Ed.2d 469 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Esther Lee Begay, Etc. v. The Kerr-Mcgee Corporation
(2×)
See Johnson v. Kerr-McGee Oil Industries, Inc., 129 Ariz. 393 , 631 P.2d 548 (Ct.App.) (Johnson I), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 454 U.S. 1025 , 102 S.Ct. 560 , 70 L.Ed.2d 469 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
US DEPT. OF HUD EX REL. GIVLER v. Smith
Truong, 728 F.Supp. at 617 ; Stillwell, 714 F.Supp. at 1096 ; see also McClure v. Carter, 513 F.Supp. 265 (D.Idaho), af f'd sub nom., McClure v. Reagan, 454 U.S. 1025 , 102 S.Ct. 559 , 70 L.Ed.2d 469 (1981); see generally Fletcher, 98 Yale L.J. at 222-23.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Witte
v.
Bar Committee of the Twenty-first Judicial Circuit
v.
Bar Committee of the Twenty-first Judicial Circuit
No. 81-477.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1981.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Mo. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certio-rari, certiorari denied.