green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.4 score
“mmediate appealability of one of the defendants' claims will not confer pendent appellate jurisdiction over defendants' other claims.”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Matthews
See Drake v. Zant, 449 U.S. 999 , 101 S.Ct. 541 , 66 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980) (certiorari denied after Georgia Supreme Court held that they would not set aside a death sentence even though one of the aggravating factors found by the jury was constitutionally defective); but see Zant v. Stephens, 631 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 90 , 70 L.Ed.2d 82 (1981).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Fitzgerald v. Penthouse International, Ltd.
But cf. 443 U.S. at 172, 99 S.Ct. at 2710 (Brennan, J., dissenting) (“The mere lapse of time is not decisive.”) In Street v. National Broadcasting Co., 645 F.2d 1227, 1235 (6th Cir.), cert. granted, --- U.S. ---, 102 S.Ct. 91 , 70 L.Ed.2d 83 (1981) a panel of the Sixth Circuit held that “once a person becomes a public figure in connection with a particular controversy, that person remains a public figure thereafter for purposes of later commentary or treatment of that controversy.” (emphasis in original).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robert Lane v. National Airmotive Corp., and Ministry of Defense, State of Israel
mmediate appealability of one of the defendants' claims will not confer pendent appellate jurisdiction over defendants' other claims.
discussed
Cited "see"
Andre Dotson v. Contemporary Media, Inc., d/b/a The Memphis Flyer, and John Branston
(2×)
See Street v. National Broadcasting Co., 645 F.2d 1227, 1233 (6th Cir.,), cert. granted, 454 U.S. 815 , 102 S.Ct. 91 , 70 L.Ed.2d 83 , cert. dismissed, 454 U.S. 1095 , 102 S.Ct. 667 , 70 L.Ed.2d 636 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Reed
(2×)
See Street v. National Broadcasting Co., 645 F.2d 1227, 1233 (6th Cir.,), cert. granted, 454 U.S. 815 , 102 S.Ct. 91 , 70 L.Ed.2d 83 , cert. dismissed, 454 U.S. 1095 , 102 S.Ct. 667 , 70 L.Ed.2d 636 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Mertens v. Division of Consumer Services, State, Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services
Accord Briggs v. Salcines, 392 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), review denied, 397 So.2d 779 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 815 , 102 S.Ct. 92 , 70 L.Ed.2d 84 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Eberhardt v. Eberhardt
See Briggs v. Salcines, 392 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 397 So.2d 779 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 815 , 102 S.Ct. 92 , 70 L.Ed.2d 84 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. The New York Times Company
(2×)
See Street v. National Broadcasting Co., 645 F.2d 1227, 1235-36 (6th Cir.), cert. granted, 454 U.S. 815 , 102 S.Ct. 91 , 70 L.Ed.2d 83 , cert. dismissed, 454 U.S. 1095 , 102 S.Ct. 667 , 70 L.Ed.2d 636 (1981); Holt v. Cox Enterprises, 590 F.Supp. 408 (N.D.Ga.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. New York Times Co.
(2×)
See Street v. National Broadcasting Co., 645 F.2d 1227, 1235-36 (6th Cir.), cert. granted, 454 U.S. 815 , 102 S.Ct. 91 , 70 L.Ed.2d 83 , cert. dismissed, 454 U.S. 1095 , 102 S.Ct. 667 , 70 L.Ed.2d 636 (1981); Holt v. Cox Enterprises, 590 F.Supp. 408 (N.D.Ga.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Thigpin v. Sun Bank of Ocala
See Briggs v. Salcines, 392 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), review denied, 397 So.2d 779 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 815 , 102 S.Ct. 92 , 70 L.Ed.2d 84 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tampa Bay Cab Co. v. Yellow Cab Co. of Tampa
See Briggs v. Salcines, 392 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), petition for review denied, 397 So.2d 779 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 815 , 102 S.Ct. 92 , 70 L.Ed.2d 84 (1981); Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c).
examined
Cited "see"
Ruby Clark v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
(3×)
See Street v. National Broadcasting Co., 645 F.2d 1227, 1233 (6th Cir.), cert. granted, 454 U.S. 815 , 102 S.Ct. 91 , 70 L.Ed.2d 83 , cert. dismissed, 454 U.S. 1095 , 102 S.Ct. 667 , 70 L.Ed.2d 636 (1981); Walker v. Cahalan, 542 F.2d 681, 684 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1647 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
J. T. v. O'Rourke in & for Tenth Judicial District
See United States v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., 637 F.2d 1248 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 815 , 102 S.Ct. 91 , 70 L.Ed.2d 84 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Tober v. Sanchez
See Briggs v. Salcines, 392 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), pet. for review denied, 397 So.2d 799 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 815 , 102 S.Ct. 92 , 70 L.Ed.2d 84 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Jimmy Lee Gray v. Eddie Lucas, Warden
See Zant v. Stephens, 454 U.S. 814 , 102 S.Ct. 90 , 70 L.Ed.2d 82 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jamal B., a Juvenile
Ed. 2d 651 (1977) (the fact that a court can exercise jurisdiction over one pre-trial motion does not mean that it can consider others at the same time); United States v. McKinley, 38 F.3d 428, 431 (9th Cir. 1994) (same); see also United States v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 637 F.2d 1248, 1251 (9th Cir. 1980), (each claim in a court's order must be examined separately to determine if it is immediately appealable), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 815 , 102 S. Ct. 91 , 70 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Silvester v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
(2×)
The court therefore concludes that plaintiffs, unlike the nephew of Russian spies in Wolston v. Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., 443 U.S. 157, 166 , 99 S.Ct. 2701, 2706 , 61 L.Ed.2d 450 (1979), were not “dragged unwillingly into the controversy.” Rather, they voluntarily injected themselves into the controversies surrounding their own jai alai businesses and thereby became public figures for this limited range of issues. *777 See Gertz, 418 U.S. at 351 , 94 S.Ct. at 3012 ; see also Street v. National Broadcasting Co., 645 F.2d 1227, 1233-35 (6th Cir.) (rape victim was public figure for…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Dupree Henry, Cross-Appellant v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
Compare Stephens v. Zant, 631 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 90 , 70 L.Ed.2d 83 (1981), in which we vacated a death sentence imposed on the basis of a statutory aggravating circumstance later declared unconstitutional, even though there were two other statutory aggravating *60 factors, either of which by itself was legally sufficient to permit the jury to impose the death penalty.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blum, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services
v.
Yaretsky
v.
Yaretsky
No. 80-1952.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondents Foley et al. for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition.