green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1987 ·
…he court limits its inquiry to the issue of whether the article is similar in structure and in mode of operation to the items found to infringe in the liability phase.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Amstar Corporation v. Envirotech Corporation
he court limits its inquiry to the issue of whether the article is similar in structure and in mode of operation to the items found to infringe in the liability phase.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Amstar Corp. v. Envirotech Corp.
he court limits its inquiry to the issue of whether the article is similar in structure and in mode of operation to the items found to infringe in the liability phase.
cited
Cited "see"
Kersavage v. United States
See Decca Ltd. v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 326, 335 , 640 F.2d 1156, 1167 (1980) cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 99 , 70 L.Ed.2d 89 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Robishaw Engineering, Inc. v. United States
See Decca Ltd. v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 326 , 640 F.2d 1156, 1166 (1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 99 , 70 L.Ed.2d 89 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States
The only portion of § 1498 that directly addresses extraterritorial application states that the provision “shall not apply to any claim arising in a foreign country.” 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (c); see Decca Limited v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 546, 550 , 544 F.2d 1070, 1072 (1976) (stating that § 1498 does not apply to “acts in foreign countries that would be infringements at home”), cert. denied 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 99 , 70 L.Ed.2d 89 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
ITT Corp. v. United States
See Decca, Ltd. v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 326, 335 , 640 F.2d 1156, 1167 (1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 99 , 70 L.Ed.2d 89 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gasset v. State
See Brown v. State, 392 So.2d 280 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 98 , 70 L.Ed.2d 89 , reh'g denied, 454 U.S. 1069 , 102 S.Ct. 619 , 70 L.Ed.2d 604 (1981) (police violated Brown's Fourth Amendment rights when they entered his enclosed yard and arrested him on his back porch); see also Payton (Fourth Amendment protects individual's privacy when individual within unambiguous physical dimension of his home); Rucker v. State, 302 So.2d 490 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974) (court invalidated warrantless police entry into home to arrest youth who had committed traffic infraction).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lang v. Pacific Marine and Supply Co., Inc.
See also Decca Ltd. v. United States, 640 F.2d 1156, 1168 , 225 Ct.Cl. 326 (1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 , 102 S.Ct. 99 , 70 L.Ed.2d 89 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mazzullo
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-1719.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (2)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.