LaVelle v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., 454 U.S. 823 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
LaVelle v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., 454 U.S. 823 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1982 · …trial judge may amend conditions of bail subject only to the statutory standards applicable to the setting of bail without any prior determination that the magistrate's order was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. ⚠ not in text
22 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Manuel W. James, Etc. And Gustavo Fernandez (ca11, 1982-04-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Manuel W. James, Etc. And Gustavo Fernandez (4×) also: Cited "see"
11th Cir. · 1982 · signal: cf. · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
trial judge may amend conditions of bail subject only to the statutory standards applicable to the setting of bail without any prior determination that the magistrate's order was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Buck
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Zuccaro, 645 F.2d 104, 106 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) ("The setting of additional conditions of bail [at second bail hearing] is neither a stage of the trial nor any of the other proceedings at which Fed.R.Crim.P. 43 requires the presence of the defendant”), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 823 , 102 S.Ct. 110 , 70 L.Ed.2d 96 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Antonio Jose Hurtado, Mark Anthony Olson, Diego Alonzo Flores-Soto, Hector Albert Rua and Jose Pita Andrade (2×)
11th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is not constrained to look for abuse of discretion or to defer to the judgment of the prior judicial officer. 54 663 F.2d at 522 ; United States v. DeMarchena, 330 F.Supp. 1223, 1226 (S.D.Cal.1971); see also, United States v. Zuccaro, 645 F.2d 104, 106 (2d Cir.) (per curiam ), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 823 , 102 S.Ct. 110 , 70 L.Ed.2d 96 (1981); Wood v. United States, 391 F.2d 981, 984 (D.C.Cir.1968). 55 Thibodeaux applied to the earlier Act, but logic compels us to assume that when Congress enacts a new statute in place of another, chooses to continue a practice such as two layers of review b…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Robert P. Delker
3rd Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
These latter considerations would be pertinent when ... the district court’s action is called before the court of appeals.” See United States v. Ellis DeMarchena, 330 F.Supp. 1223, 1226 (S.D.Cal.1971); see also United States v. Zuccaro, 645 F.2d 104, 106 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 823 , 102 S.Ct. 110 , 70 L.Ed.2d 96 (1981); Wood v. United States, 391 F.2d 981, 984 (D.C.Cir.1968); cf. United States v. Provenzano, 605 F.2d 85 (3d Cir.1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LaVelle
v.
Workers' Compensation Appeals Board of California
No. 80-1896.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
454 U.S. 823
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2)

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.