green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
13.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1982 ·
…an essential characteristic of any acceptable place, time and manner regulation is that it leave adequate alternative methods of communication
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
American Future Systems, Inc. v. The Pennsylvania State University
the important question is whether the publication as a whole relates solely to the economic interest of the speaker and its audience.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State University
the important question is whether the publication as a whole relates solely tó the economic interest of the speaker and its audience.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Michael Tacynec, James McDonald and Northeast Philadelphia String Band, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia Robert W. Crawford, Commissioner, Dept. Of Recreation of the City of Philadelphia Philadelphia New Year Shooters and Mummers Association, Inc. Aqua String Band Inc. Avalon String Band Inc. Broomall String Band Inc. Duffy String Band Inc. Durning String Band Inc. Ferko String Band Inc. Fralinger String Band Inc. Greater Kensington String Band Inc. Greater Overbrook String Band Inc. Hegeman String Band Inc. Polish American String Band Inc. Quaker City String Band Inc. South Philadelphia String Band, Inc. Trilby String Band Inc. Uptown String Band Inc. Woodland String Band Inc. Russell J. Geiser South Jersey String Band, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia Robert W. Crawford
an essential characteristic of any acceptable place, time and manner regulation is that it leave adequate alternative methods of communication
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tacynec v. City of Philadelphia
an essential characteristic of any acceptable place, time and manner regulation is that it leave adequate alternative methods of communication
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No. 54, Afl-Cio, Plaintiff-Counter v. E.F. Etie Sheet Metal Co., Defendant-Counter v. Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 54, Afl-Cio, Counter-Defendants-Appellees
See Mobile Mechanical Contractors Ass'n v. Carlough, 664 F.2d 481, 486 (5th Cir. Unit A Dec.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1982) (noting that the NJAB was formed to resolve disputes between employers and union locals).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No. 54 v. E.F. Etie Sheet Metal Co.
See Mobile Mechanical Contractors Ass’n v. Carlough, 664 F.2d 481, 486 (5th Cir. Unit A Dec.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1982) (noting that the NJAB was formed to resolve disputes between employers and union locals).
discussed
Cited "see"
Local 812, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Afl-Cio, Canada Dry Distributors Association of New Jersey) v. National Labor Relations Board
See Mobile Mechanical Contractors Ass'n v. Carlough, 664 F.2d 481, 484-86 (5th Cir.1981) (prohibiting union efforts to compel an employer to act as if it were a member of an existing employer organization), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1982); Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Local 137, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 623 F.2d 1354, 1357-1359 (9th Cir.) (prohibiting coercive union conduct with the object of forcing employers to engage in multi-employer bargaining whether or not the employers are formally joined in an "employer organization"), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 10…
discussed
Cited "see"
Local 812, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board
See Mobile Mechanical Contractors Ass’n v. Carlough, 664 F.2d 481, 484-86 (5th Cir.1981) (prohibiting union efforts to compel an employer to act as if it were a member of an existing employer organization), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1982); Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Local 137, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 623 F.2d 1354, 1357-1359 (9th Cir.) (prohibiting coercive union conduct with the object of forcing employers to engage in multi-employer bargaining whether or not the employers are formally joined in an “employer organization”), cert. denied, 449 U…
cited
Cited "see"
Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
See Republic Nat’l Bank of New York v. Sabet, 512 F.Supp. 416, 426 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, *1276 681 F.2d 802 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 976 , 102 S.Ct. 2241 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Project 80's, Inc. And David John Fitzen v. City of Pocatello and the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho
See abo Ad World, Inc. v. Township of Doylestown, 672 F.2d 1136, 1142 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Christopher L. Lowe, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants
See Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission, 447 U.S. 557, 563-64 , 100 S.Ct. 2343, 2350 , 65 L.Ed.2d 341 (1980). 12 The court went on to suggest, however, that the case actually fell "outside the rubric of commercial speech." Although recognizing that the Supreme Court had never explicitly so held, Judge Weinstein stated that commercial speech consisted only of advertising, citing Ad World, Inc. v. Township of Doylestown, 672 F.2d 1136, 1140 (3d Cir.1982) (citing Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376 , 93 S.Ct. 2553 , 37 L.Ed.2…
cited
Cited "see"
Pennsylvania Public Interest Coalition v. York Township
See Ad World, Inc. v. Township of Doylestown, 672 F.2d 1136, 1141 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 456 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1982). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local No. 252 v. Standard Sheet Metal, Inc.
See Mobile Mechanical Contractors Association v. Carlough, 664 F.2d 481 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1982); NLRB v. Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association, Local 38, 575 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1978); Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association # 59, 227 N.L.R.B. 520 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Distribution Systems of America, Inc. v. Village of Old Westbury
See, e.g., Ad World, Inc. v. Township of Doylestown, 672 F.2d 1136, 1141-42 (3rd Cir.1982), cert. denied 456 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1983) (local ordinance making it unlawful to distribute advertising material to homes without affirmative consent of home occupant is not a content-based regulation).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Project 80's, Inc. And David John Fitzen v. City of Pocatello and the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho
See also Ad World, Inc. v. Township of Doylestown, 672 F.2d 1136, 1142 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
T.S.I. 27, Inc. v. Berman Enterprises, Inc.
Id.; see also Republic Nat’l Bank v. Sabet, 512 F.Supp. 416, 427 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 681 F.2d 802 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 976 , 102 S.Ct. 2241 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Steelworkers of America Afl-Cio-Clc v. Johnson
See, e.g., Mobile Mechanical Contractors Assn. v. Carlough, 664 F.2d 481, 484-85 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 ; Kling v. NLRB, 503 F.2d 1044, 1046 (9th Cir.1975); Douds v. Local 1250, 170 F.2d 700, 701 (2nd Cir.1948).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Steelworkers of America v. Johnson
See, e.g., Mobile Mechanical Contractors Assn. v. Carlough, 664 F.2d 481, 484-85 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 975 , 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 ; Kling v. NLRB, 503 F.2d 1044, 1046 (9th Cir.1975); Douds v. Local 1250, 170 F.2d 700, 701 (2nd Cir.1948).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Future Systems, Inc. v. The Pennsylvania State University
See also Ad World, Inc. v. Township of Doylestown, 672 F.2d 1136 , 1139 n.6 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1982). 42 The decision in this case leaves open to Penn State the opportunity on remand to produce evidence to show a substantial state interest to support its policy.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State University
See also Ad World, Inc. v. Township of Doylestown, 672 F.2d 1136 , 1139 n.6 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2240 , 72 L.Ed.2d 850 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Douglas
v.
Florida
v.
Florida
No. 81-1775.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (4)
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.