green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Garrett A. Tansley, A/K/A Jerry Tansley and Douglas Raymond Cox, A/K/A Doug Kelly
See United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 793 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arloha Mae Pinto, United States of America v. Marcel Samuel Lambert
See United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 784 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ira Paul Citron
See United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776 , 778 n. 2 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); United States v. Gay, 567 F.2d 1206 (2d Cir.1978); United States v. Bianco, 534 F.2d 501 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); United States v. Fisher, 518 F.2d 836 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1033 , 96 S.Ct. 565 , 46 L.Ed.2d 407 (1975); Taglianetti v. United States, 398 F.2d 558, 562 (1st Cir.1968), aff'd, 394 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 1099 , 22 L.Ed.2d 302 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Oxman, United States of America v. William H. Pflaumer
(2×)
See United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 790-91 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); App. at 1665-66.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William H. Pflaumer
(2×)
See United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 790-91 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); App. at 1665-66.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Nixon Rush, Larry Joseph Lancelotti, Gregory Lee Lancelotti, Harry J. Shnurman, Robert Michael Cohen, Thomas G. Converse, David Earl Johnson, Irving F. Imoberstag, Carl Eric Olsen, Jacob Shnurman, Randall Collins, Jeffrey Allen Brown, and David Nissenbaum, United States of America v. Michael Lee Risolvato, United States of America v. Charles Leaton
Whether such an inference may be drawn depends upon the surrounding circumstances, including the nature of the relationship (whether it is commercial rather than personal), the quantity of the drug (whether it is too large for personal use only), the number of people involved, and statements or conduct on the part of the defendants. 60 Id. at 450 ; see United States v. Taylor, 683 F.2d 18, 21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 261 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982) (Swiderski inapplicable to complex operation, a large quantity of marijuana); United States v. Wright, 593 F.2d 105, 108 (9th…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rush
Id. at 450; see United States v. Taylor, 683 F.2d 18, 21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 261 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982) [Swiderski inapplicable to complex operation, a large quantity of marijuana); United States v. Wright, 593 F.2d 105, 108 (9th Cir.1979) [Swiderski not applicable where drug not simultaneously and jointly acquired).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilson
Accord United States v. Vaughan, 682 F.2d 290, 293 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 261 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); United States v. Eades, 633 F.2d 1075, 1077 (4th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1001 , 101 S.Ct. 1709 , 68 L.Ed.2d 203 (1981); United States v. Brown, 608 F.2d 551, 554 (5th Cir.1979). 38 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Enrique Reinaldo Rivera and Samuel Aponte-Vega
See Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171, 175 , 107 S.Ct. 2775, 2778-79 , 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987); United States v. Tracy, 12 F.3d 1186, 1196 (2d Cir.1993); see also United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 786 (2d Cir.) (declarations of one member of a conspiracy are admissible against another member “only if made ‘during the course of and in furtherance of the conspiracy”’ (quoting Rule)), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Matos-Peralta
It is “well-settled that declarations that are otherwise hearsay may nonetheless be provisionally admitted pursuant to Rule 801(d)(2)(E)____” United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108, 136 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 , 103 S.Ct. 1891 , 77 L.Ed.2d 282 (1983); see, e.g., United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 787-89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Persico
The Second Circuit has stated that “[t]he law is well-settled that declarations that are otherwise hearsay may nonetheless be provisionally admitted pursuant to Rule 801(d)(2)(E)____” United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108, 136 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 , 103 S.Ct. 1891 , 77 L.Ed.2d 282 (1983); see e.g., United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 786-90 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); United States v. Cambindo-Valenda, 609 F.2d 603, 630 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morton
v.
Providence Hospital
v.
Providence Hospital
No. 82-514.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1982.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.