green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Transouth Financial Corp. v. Bell
See Ranger Fuel Corp. v. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co., 677 F.2d 378, 379-80 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 836 , 103 S.Ct. 81 , 74 L.Ed.2d 77 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dale Baker, United States of America v. Carnell Miller, United States of America v. Ervin Jackson, United States of America v. Virlin Jackson, United States of America v. Michael Petty, United States of America v. Vincent Beauregard, United States of America v. Frank Noble
See United States v. Dazzo, 672 F.2d 284, 289 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 836 , 103 S.Ct. 81 , 74 L.Ed.2d 77 (1982). 17 C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Baker
See United States v. Dazzo, 672 F.2d 284, 289 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 836 , 103 S.Ct. 81 , 74 L.Ed.2d 77 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Main Hurdman
The federal rules are purely procedural. 28 U.S.C. § 2072 (1982); see Del Re v. Prudential Lines, Inc., 669 F.2d 93, 96 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 836 , 103 S.Ct. 81 , 74 L.Ed.2d 77 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nick Dipaolo, Edward Weather, and Paul Snyder (A/k/a \Dusty\")"
See United States v. Dazzo, 672 F.2d 284, 289 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 836 , 103 S.Ct. 81 , 74 L.Ed.2d 77 (1982); United States v. Ochs, 595 F.2d 1247, 1262 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 435 , 62 L.Ed.2d 328 (1979); see generally Project, Fifteenth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal 1984-1985, 74 Geo.L.J. 499, 853-57 (1986) (discussing improper considerations in determining sentences).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clarence E.. Okeson v. Tolley School District No. 25
"The verdict ... must be supported by substantial evidence; mere scintilla is not enough." Harris v. Pirch, 677 F.2d 681, 683 (8th Cir.1982) (citations omitted); see Banks v. Koehring Co., 538 F.2d 176, 178 (8th Cir.1976). 19 "Due process under the Fourteenth Amendment requires that state governments provide minimal procedural safeguards, including some form of notice and a hearing, before taking actions that deprive an individual of 'liberty' or 'property.' " Kersey v. Shipley, 673 F.2d 730, 732 (4th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 836 , 103 S.Ct. 80 , 74 L.Ed.2d 77 (1982); …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sugar
See United States v. Dazzo, 672 F.2d 284, 288 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 836 , 103 S.Ct. 81 , 74 L.Ed.2d 77 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Defio v. Henderson
Wills v. Andrews, 903 F.Supp. 318, 320 (N.D.N.Y.1995); see also United States v. Dazzo, 672 F.2d 284, 289 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 836 , 103 S.Ct 81 , 74 L.Ed.2d 77 (1982) and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coley v. Dragon Ltd.
See also Ranger Fuel Corp. v. Youghiogheny and Ohio Coal Co., 677 F.2d 378 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 836 , 103 S.Ct. 81 , 74 L.Ed.2d 77 (1982); Fortuin v. Milhorat, 683 F.Supp. 1 (D.D.C.1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kersey
v.
Shipley
v.
Shipley
No. 81-2311.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.