Riola v. United States, 460 U.S. 1073 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Riola v. United States, 460 U.S. 1073 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“ojne's official position as a member of the law enforcement community does not require a court in the exercise of its discretion to excuse a juror for cause where the juror has stated that he or she could remain impartial”
32 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. John Javilo McCullah (ca10, 1996-02-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. John Javilo McCullah
10th Cir. · 1996 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
ojne's official position as a member of the law enforcement community does not require a court in the exercise of its discretion to excuse a juror for cause where the juror has stated that he or she could remain impartial
cited Cited as authority (rule) Freddie Sevier v. Kenneth Turner
6th Cir. · 1984 · confidence medium
Ct. 1533, 75 L.Ed.2d 953 (1983); United States ex rel.
discussed Cited "see" Hunt v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McCord, 695 F.2d 823, 826 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1073 , 103 S.Ct. 1533 , 75 L.Ed.2d 953 (1983) (wherein the court found no constitutional violation notwithstanding the fact that *1031 accused was the first person in over 26 years to be prosecuted in that district for unlawful flight to avoid confinement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1073 ).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter Lodge
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Riola, 694 F.2d 670 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1073 , 103 S.Ct. 1532 , 75 L.Ed.2d 953 (1983). 20 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Billy Lee Anderson, Jr., Emanuel Isaacs, Harold Hart, James Stymest, United States of America v. Emanuel Isaacs
11th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
Under these circumstances, Mirkin was clearly entitled to testify about the incriminating statements. “[T]he Fifth Amendment is not violated by the use of prearrest silence to impeach a criminal defendant’s credibility.” Jenkins v. Anderson, 447 U.S. 231, 238 , 100 S.Ct. 2124, 2129 , 65 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980); see also United States v. Riola, 694 F.2d 670, 673 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1073 , 103 S.Ct. 1532 , 75 L.Ed.2d 953 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Riola
v.
United States
No. 82-6341.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1983.
460 U.S. 1073
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.