green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.2 score
“e need not decide whether fed.r.evid. 104(a) permits a geaney finding based on hearsay which is inadmissible under the federal rules.”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 46 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Payden
e need not decide whether fed.r.evid. 104(a) permits a geaney finding based on hearsay which is inadmissible under the federal rules.
discussed
Cited "see"
Simpson v. US West Communications, Inc.
(2×)
See Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc. v. CPC International, Inc., 679 F.2d 516, 528 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); and United States v. E.I.
discussed
Cited "see"
Charbonnet v. Lee
(2×)
Accord Dimmitt Agri Indus., Inc. v. CPC Int'l, Inc., 679 F.2d 516 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); Sulmeyer v. Coca Cola Co., 515 F.2d 835 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Clayton J. Charbonnet, Jr. v. Sheriff Harry Lee and Lt. Edwin McClendon Donald E. Strain, D.D.S., a Professional Dental Corp., James D. Kiser, D.D.S., a Professional Dental Corp., Joseph J. Collura, D.D.S., a Professional Dental Corp., and Lakeside Dental Group, Defendants-Third-Party v. Continental Casualty Co., Third-Party
(2×)
Accord Dimmitt Agri Indus., Inc. v. CPC Int'l, Inc., 679 F.2d 516 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); Sulmeyer v. Coca Cola Co., 515 F.2d 835 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976) 21 See, e.g., 5A Moore's Federal Practice p 50.08, p. 50-77 (emphasizing that the rule is intended to allow a party to defend against an argument of deficient proof before it is too late to cure it).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl Wayne Nash
(2×)
See United States v. Vadino, 680 F.2d 1329, 1336-37 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sandini
See United States v. Vadino, 680 F.2d 1329, 1336 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sandini
See United States v. Vadino, 680 F.2d 1329, 1336 (11th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walsh v. City Mortgage Services, Inc.
(2×)
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2537 (1971); see, Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc. v. CPC International, Inc., 679 F.2d 516, 521 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Agola v. Hagner
(2×)
See George Banta Co. v. N.L.R.B., 686 F.2d 10 , 20-21 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); N.L.R.B. v. Murray Products, Inc., supra, 584 F.2d at 938 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoke Co., Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority
(2×)
See Queen v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 689 F.2d 80, 85 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983) (the language of the *746 TVA Act, 16 U.S.C. § 831c(b), indicates a broad waiver of sovereign immunity).
discussed
Cited "see"
Local Union 1395, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See George Banta Co. v. NLRB, 686 F.2d 10 , 20 (D.C.Cir.1982), cer t. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Local Union 1395, International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See George Banta Co. v. NLRB, 686 F.2d 10 , 20 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983). 27 While stating generally that it agreed with the ALJ's conclusions respecting the extrinsic evidence of the parties' intent, the Board did not address this specific finding.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Badalamenti
(2×)
United States v. Cambindo Valencia, supra, 609 F.2d at 635 n. 24; see United States v. Cicale, 691 F.2d 95, 103-05 (2d Cir.1982) (statements of co-conspirator declarant independently admissible under a separate hearsay exception (Rule 803(3)) and thus may be relied on to make Geaney finding), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); United States v. Sperling, 726 F.2d 69 (2d Cir.) (similar to Cicale), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3516 , 82 L.Ed.2d 824 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Payden
Under Rule 801(d)(2)(E), before a jury may consider out of court statements by a third party against a defendant, this court must be satisfied by a fair preponderance of the independent non-hearsay evidence that the defendant and the third-party declarant were in fact members of the same conspiracy, United States v. Geaney, 417 F.2d 1116, 1120 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1028 , 90 S.Ct. 1276 , 25 L.Ed.2d 539 (1970); see United States v. Cicale, 691 F.2d 95, 103-04 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983), and that this conspiracy is the cons…
discussed
Cited "see"
C.E. Services, Inc. v. Control Data Corporation
(2×)
See Dimmitt Agri Industries v. CPC International, Inc., 679 F.2d 516 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983). 2 We approach this issue with some trepidation, mindful of the ad hoc, fact-specific core embedded in any determination of relevant market.
discussed
Cited "see"
Deborah J. Jones, Individually, and as Next Friend of Lanae Elizabeth Jones, and as Representative of the Estate of Lannie L. Jones v. United States
(2×)
See Scales v. United States, 685 F.2d 970, 973 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1772 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency, 639 F.2d 1146, 1150 (5th Cir.1981); Johnson v. United States, 631 F.2d 34, 36 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1018 , 101 S.Ct. 3007 , 69 L.Ed.2d 389 (1981); Vallance v. United States, 574 F.2d 1282, 1283 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 453 , 58 L.Ed.2d 423 (1978); Lowe v. United States, 440 F.2d 452, 452-53 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 833 , 92 S.Ct. 83 , 30 L.Ed.2d 64 (1971); Shults v. United Stat…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Calvin Bein, Thomas Deangelis, Albert Vitti, and Arthur Billups
United States v. Ellenbogen, 365 F.2d 982, 985 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 923 , 87 S.Ct. 892 , 17 L.Ed.2d 795 (1967); accord, United States v. Cicale, 691 F.2d 95, 106 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morinville v. Old Colony Cooperative Bank
(2×)
See Queen v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 689 F.2d 80, 87 (6th Cir.1982) (Merritt, J., dissenting), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983) (arguing that most federal officials should be entitled to only a qualified immunity defense); Granger v. Marek, 583 F.2d 781, 786-87 (6th Cir.1978) (Merritt, J., dissenting) (arguing, in a post Butz decision, that IRS agents should be entitled to only a qualified immunity defense against a common law tort action).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael James Delutis, A/K/A John Doe, United States of America v. Adolf \George\" Eunis
See United States v. Vadino, 680 F.2d 1329, 1335 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); United States v. Gallo, 659 F.2d 110, 113-115 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Campagnuolo, 592 F.2d 852, 861-863 (5th Cir.1979); United States v. Fuller, 441 F.2d 755, 760 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 830 , 92 S.Ct. 73 , 30 L.Ed.2d 59 (1971). 31 In any event, the convictions of the Eunises did not depend on the two phone calls in question as the evidence against each of them was overwhelming without the calls.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. DeLutis
See United States v. Vadino, 680 F.2d 1329, 1335 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); United States v. Gallo, 659 F.2d 110, 113-115 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Campagnuolo, 592 F.2d 852, 861-863 (5th Cir.1979); United States v. Fuller, 441 F.2d 755, 760 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 830 , 92 S.Ct. 73 , 30 L.Ed.2d 59 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ellis Gaspard and Opal Gaspard v. United States of America, Dennis Ronald Sheehan and Nellie Katherine Sheehan, Husband and Wife v. United States
See Scales v. United States, 685 F.2d 970 (5th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1772 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983) (Feres doctrine bars FTCA claims of service person’s daughter even when Veterans Benefits Act allows no administrative remedy).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418, Afl-Cio Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-75, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., Intervenor. International Chemical Workers Union Local No. 733, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Borden Chemical, a Division of Borden, Inc., Intervenor. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Kansas City, Local No. 5-114, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Colgate-Palmolive Company, Intervenor. Borden Chemical, a Division of Borden, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, International Chemical Workers Union, Local No. 733, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418, Afl-Cio, Intervenors. Colgate-Palmolive Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Kansas City, Local No. 5-114, Afl-Cio, Intervenor
(2×)
Case Co. v. NLRB, 253 F.2d at 154 , and that silence in the bargaining agreement is insufficient to constitute such a waiver, Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. NLRB, 398 F.2d 631, 636 (6th Cir.1968); see George Banta Co., Banta Div. v. NLRB, 686 F.2d 10, 20 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418 v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
Case Co. v. NLRB, 253 F.2d at 154 , and that silence in the bargaining agreement is insufficient to constitute such a waiver, Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. NLRB, 398 F.2d 631, 636 (6th Cir.1968); see George Banta Co., Ban-ta Div. v. NLRB, 686 F.2d 10, 20 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New Mexico Oncology & Hematology Consultants, Ltd. v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services
(2×)
See also Reazin, 899 F.2d at 967 (comparing Valley Liquors, Inc. v. Renfield Importers, Ltd., 822 F.2d 656, 667 (7th Cir.) ("Without a showing of special market conditions or other compelling evidence of market power, the lowest possible market share legally sufficient to sustain a finding of monopolization is between 17% and 25%.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 977 , 108 S.Ct 488 , 98 L.Ed.2d 486 (1987), and Dimmitt Agri Indus., Inc. v. CPC Int’l Inc., 679 F.2d 516, 529 (5th Cir.1982) ("market shares in the range of 16 to 25 percent, such as those held by [defendant] are insufficient-at least a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mays v. Tennessee Valley Authority
(2×)
Bank of Huntsville, Ala. v. Meredith, 812 F.2d 682, 684-85 (11th Cir. 1987)); see also Queen v. TVA, 689 F.2d 80, 85 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. King
See, e.g., United States v. Vadino, 680 F.2d 1329, 1337 (11th Cir.1982) (stating that government bears burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt in entrapment case), cert. denied, 460 *1570 U.S. 1082, 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); United States v. Smith, 588 F.2d 111 , 116 n. 25 (5th Cir.) (same), modified on other grounds, 594 F.2d 1084 (1979); United States v. Benavidez, 558 F.2d 308, 310 (5th Cir.1977) (same); United States v. Silver, 457 F.2d 1217, 1220 (3d Cir.1972) (referring to fact that burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt is on government in entrapment case as a “settled …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rebel Oil Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Dimmitt Agri Indus., Inc. v. CPC Int'l Inc., 679 F.2d 516, 528 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); Twin City Sportservice, 512 F.2d at 1274 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rebel Oil Company, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Company
(2×)
See, e.g., Dimmitt Agri Indus., Inc. v. CPC Int'l, Inc., 679 F.2d 516, 528 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); Twin City Sportservice, 512 F.2d at 1274 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joshua Romero, a Minor, by His Father and Next Friend, Clifford A. Romero Clifford A. Romero Roxanna A. Romero v. United States
Compare Del Rio v. United States, 833 F.2d 282 (11th Cir.1987), 4 with Scales v. United States, 685 F.2d 970 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1772 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983), 5 and Irvin v. United States, 845 F.2d 126 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 975 , 109 S.Ct. 513 , 102 L.Ed.2d 548 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dbi Services, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation, and Bonner Lease Service, Etc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Dimmit Agri Indus. v. CPC Int'l, Inc., 679 F.2d 516, 521 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walter L. Reazin, M.D. Hca Health Services of Kansas, Inc., D/B/A Wesley Medical Center Health Care Plus, Inc. And New Century Life Insurance Co. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc., and Counterclaim and Hmo Kansas, Inc., Additional Counterclaim v. Hospital Corporation of America, Additional Counterclaim
(2×)
Compare Valley Liquors, Inc. v. Renfield Importers, Ltd., 822 F.2d 656, 667 (7th Cir.) ("Without a showing of special market conditions or other compelling evidence of market power, the lowest possible market share legally sufficient to sustain a finding of monopolization is between 17% and 25%."), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 977 , 108 S.Ct. 488 , 98 L.Ed.2d 486 (1987), and Dimmitt Agri Indus., Inc. v. CPC Int'l, Inc., 679 F.2d 516, 529 (5th Cir.1982) ("market shares in the range of 16 to 25 percent, such as those held by [defendant] are insufficient--at least absent other compelling structural evi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.
(2×)
Compare Valley Liquors, Inc. v. Renfield Importers, Ltd., 822 F.2d 656, 667 (7th Cir.) (“Without a showing of special market conditions or other compelling evidence of market power, the lowest possible market share legally sufficient to sustain a finding of monopolization is between 17% and 25%.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 977 , 108 S.Ct. 488 , 98 L.Ed.2d 486 (1987), and Dimmitt Agri Indus., Inc. v. CPC Int'l, Inc., 679 F.2d 516, 529 (5th Cir.1982) (“market shares in the range of 16 to 25 percent, such as those held by [defendant] are insufficient — at least absent other compelling struc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosa Santiago, United States of America v. Ariel Santiago
See, e.g., United States v. Vadino, 680 F.2d 1329, 1333-34 (11th Cir.) (admission of telephone statements of coconspirator later charged in superseding indictment, if error, harmless beyond reasonable doubt because defendant’s participation in conspiracy established by overwhelming independent evidence), aff 'd per curiam, 691 F.2d 977, 978 (1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); United States v. Glover, 677 F.2d 57, 59 (10th Cir.1982) (dictum) (admission of coconspirator’s testimony before defendant’s partic *869 ipation in conspiracy shown, if erro…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Valley Liquors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.
(2×)
Domed Stadium Hotel, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 732 F.2d 480 , 489 & n. 11 (5th Cir.1984); see also Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc. v. CPC Int *667 ernational, Inc., 679 F.2d 516, 529-30 (5th Cir.1982) (market share percentages on the order of 25% could not, as a matter of law, support a monopolization claim, at least not in the absence of “other compelling structural evidence”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); Broadway Delivery Corp. v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc., 651 F.2d 122, 129 (2d Cir.) (presumption that market share below 50% in the a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James T. Martin, Jr. v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, Richard Xander, James T. Martin, Jr. v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, Richard Xander
(2×)
See, e.g., Queen v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 689 F.2d 80, 87 (6th Cir.1982) (Merritt, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); Morinville v. Old Colony Cooperative Bank, 579 F.Supp. 1498, 1502-03 (D.R.I.1984); 5 DAVIS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE 116-17 (2d ed. 1984); SCHUCK, SUING GOVERNMENT 89-92 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mississippi Industries v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Missouri Public Service Commission, Mississippi Power & Light Company, Louisiana Power & Light Company, City of New Orleans, Louisiana, Mississippi Public Service Commission, State of Arkansas, Union Carbide Corporation, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Arkansas & Missouri Congressional Delegations, Louisiana Public Service Commission, Arkansas Public Service Commission, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, Arkansas Power & Light Company, Middle South Energy, Inc., Middle South Services, Inc., and Cities of Conway and West Memphis, Arkansas, Intervenors. Mississippi Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arkansas Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mississippi Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Occidental Chemical Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Reynolds Metals Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arkansas and Missouri Congressional Delegations v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, State of Arkansas v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mississippi Legal Services Coalition v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of New Orleans v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Missouri Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Representative Webb Franklin v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See, e.g., Middle South Services, Inc., 16 FERC p 61,101 (1981) (modifying the 1973 System Agreement), aff'd, Louisiana Public Service Commission v. FERC, 688 F.2d 357 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 343 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
(2×)
See, e.g., Queen v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 689 F.2d 80, 87 (6th Cir.1982) (Merritt, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); Morinville v. Old Colony Cooperative Bank, 579 F.Supp. 1498, 1502-03 (D.R.I.1984); 5 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise 116-17 (2d ed. 1984); Schuck, Suing Government 89-92 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mississippi Industries v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See, e.g., Middle South Services, Inc., 16 FERC ¶ 61,101 (1981) (modifying the 1973 System Agreement), aff'd, Louisiana Public Service Commission v. FERC, 688 F.2d 357 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 343 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Heath v. United States
See also Scales v. United States, 685 F.2d 970 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1772 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daniel Edward Bynum v. Fmc Corporation
Most recently, for example, in United States v. Shearer, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 3039 , 87 L.Ed.2d 38 (1985), the Supreme Court stated explicitly that the other factors mentioned in the Feres and Stencel decisions were “no longer controlling.” Id. at-n. 4, 105 S.Ct. at 3043 n. 4. 7 Rather, to the Shearer Court, the central questions have become “whether the suit requires the civilian court to second-guess military decisions and whether the suit might impair essential military discipline.” Id. (citations omitted); see also Scales v. United States, 685 F.2d 970, 973 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Melton
In addition, “pieces of evidence must be viewed not in isolation but in conjunction.” United States v. Carson, supra, 702 F.2d at 362 (citation omitted); see also United States v. Cicale, 691 F.2d 95, 103 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); United States v. Geaney, 417 F.2d 1116, 1121 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1028 , 90 S.Ct. 1276 , 25 L.Ed.2d 539 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olympia Co., Inc. v. Celotex Corp.
(2×)
See also, Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc. v. CPC International, Inc., 679 F.2d 516, 528-531, nn. 11-13 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Phelps
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Cicale, 691 F.2d 95, 103 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1771 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); United States v. Kopituk, 690 F.2d 1289, 1324 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2089 , 77 L.Ed.2d 300 (1983); United States v. Rodriquez, 689 F. 2d 516, 518 (5th Cir.1982); United States v. Ciampaglia, supra, 628 F. 2d at 638 ; United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 999-1000 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); United States v. Santiago, supra, 582 F.2d at 1134-35 ; United States v. Enright, supra,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fort Pierce Utilities Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See also Louisiana Public Service Commission v. FERC, 688 F.2d 357, 359-60 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 343 (1983); Alabama Electric Cooperative v. FERC, 684 F.2d 20, 27 (D.C.Cir.1982). 43 The Commission in this case found as a matter of fact that essentially non-interruptible service for a particular contract period was not "firm." But it also found that it was not typical interruptible service such as that involved in Kentucky Utilities Co., 15 FERC p 61,002 (1981), rehearing denied, 15 FERC p 61,222 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fort Pierce Utilities Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See also Louisiana Public Service Commission v. FERC, 688 F.2d 357, 359-60 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1082 , 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 343 (1983); Alabama Electric Cooperative v. FERC, 684 F.2d 20, 27 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Quality Foods De Centro America, S.A. And Duroparts De El Salvador, S.A. v. Latin American Agribusiness Development Corporation, S.A.
(2×)
Sulmeyer v. Coca Cola Co., 515 F.2d 835, 850-51 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976); see also Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc. v. CPC International, Inc., 679 F.2d 516, 531-32 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, —U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1770 , 76 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983). 8 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Queen
v.
Tennessee Valley Authority
v.
Tennessee Valley Authority
No. 82-1148.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.