green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.0 score
“since the officers making the stop were acting upon orders from lieutenant yinger and the direction of agent duffy ... we must decide whether duffy's broadcast and yinger's order to stop the white lincoln meet the test of terry v. ohio.”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Franklin
since the officers making the stop were acting upon orders from lieutenant yinger and the direction of agent duffy ... we must decide whether duffy's broadcast and yinger's order to stop the white lincoln meet the test of terry v. ohio.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eliezer Yehudah Neufeld
See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1280 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (holding that appellant’s own statement admitting act, even if mere puffery, is sufficient to justify a jury finding that he committed the act for purposes of Rule 404(b).)” Calderon, 127 F.3d at 1332 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alberto Calderon
See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1280 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (holding that appellant’s own statement admitting act, even if mere puffery, is sufficient to justify a jury finding that he committed the act for purposes of Rule 404(b)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Calderon
See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1280 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (holding that appellant's own statement admitting act, even if mere puffery, is sufficient to justify a jury finding that he committed the act for purposes of Rule 404(b)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eleazar Garcia
See United States v. Nanez, 694 F.2d 405, 413 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (holding that where a challenge to the validity of a prior conviction was barred by § 851(e), the district court’s failure to inform the defendant of the timing of a challenge did not require a remand for resentencing); see also United States v. Weaver, 905 F.2d 1466, 1482 (11th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 972 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1058 (1991) (where § 851(e) bars challenge to prior conviction, failure to comply with warning requirement of § 851(b) …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vickie J. Wylie
(2×)
See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1282 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1984). 64 Even if, arguendo, Wylie had not waived this issue, she would be unable to prove that the alleged time pressures on certain jurors constituted "a significant risk of prejudice." United States v. Patterson, 648 F.2d 625, 629 (9th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter R. Farrell and Paul A. Farrell
Evid. 103(a)(1) and (d); see United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1281-82 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William Michael Stubbins
See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1280 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond J. Stephany v. George Wagner, Warden, Robert Santoro, Assistant Warden, Joseph Demarco, Prison Administrator
See Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 249 , 103 S.Ct. 1741, 1747 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983); Connecticut Board of Pardons v, Dumschat, 452 U.S. 468 , 467, 101 S.Ct. 2460, 2465 , 69 L.Ed.2d 158 (1981) (Brennan, J., concurring).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Earl Davis
See United States v. Nanez, 694 F.2d 405, 410 (5th Cir.1982) (holding that for bolstering to constitute plain error, the prosecutor must intertwine “his personal and official credibility with the credibility of the witnesses”), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zarate v. State
See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1279-81 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983); United States v. Moreno-Nunez, 595 F.2d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.1979); United States v. Catano, 553 F.2d 497, 499-500 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 865 , 98 S.Ct. 199 , 54 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul W. Granville
See United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1282 (11th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983); United States v. Brown, 548 F.2d 1194, 1207 (5th Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Charles Levay
See also United States v. Nanez, 694 F.2d 405, 411-12 (5th Cir.1982) (dicta), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bailey
See also United States v. Mobley, 699 F.2d 172, 174-75 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (stop made pursuant to order by police superior only lawful where the superior had sufficient facts to justify the stop); United States v. Robinson, 536 F.2d 1298, 1299 (9th Cir.1976) (if dispatcher did not have just cause, he could not create justification by relaying the information to another officer); People v. Hazelhurst, 662 P.2d 1081, 1085 (Colo.1983) (stop at request of other officers lawful only upon showing of reasonable suspicion in officers making t…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas H. Taylor, Jr., A/K/A Seifullah Rahman, United States of America v. Vernon A. Collins, A/K/A Bey Brother
See also United States v. Mobley, 699 F.2d 172, 174-76 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1883 -84, 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Robert Bolinger, Robert Jerome McTeer Bruce Hayes Munro, Juan Carlos De La Fuente, United States of America v. Juan Carlos De La Fuente, (Two Cases)
Id.; see also United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1282 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1984) (no abuse of discretion in refusing to interrogate jury about alleged juror misconduct where defendant waited to hear the verdict before contesting jury's impartiality); United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.1982) (en banc) (untimely notification of juror misconduct waives right to new trial even where actual prejudice can be shown). 7 Although the June 10 telephone call did not disclose the full extent of Hunter's misconduct, 2 enough …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bolinger
Id.; see also United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1282 (11th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1984) (no abuse of discretion in refusing to interrogate jury about alleged juror misconduct where defendant waited to hear the verdict before contesting jury’s impartiality); United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.1982) (en banc) (untimely notification of juror misconduct waives right to new trial even where actual prejudice can be shown).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Robert Bolinger, Robert Jerome McTeer Bruce Hayes Munro, Juan Carlos De La Fuente, United States of America v. Johnny Dean Hall, United States of America v. Juan Carlos De La Fuente, United States of America v. Oscar Cruz-Barrientos, United States of America v. Juan Carlos De La Fuente
Id.; see also United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1282 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1984) (no abuse of discretion in refusing to interrogate jury about alleged juror misconduct where defendant waited to hear the verdict before contesting jury's impartiality); United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.1982) (en banc) (untimely notification of juror misconduct waives right to new trial even where actual prejudice can be shown). 16 In this case, not only did de la Fuente fail to offer the requisite evidence of timeliness, it is cle…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bollinger
Id.; see also United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1282 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1984) (no abuse of discretion in refusing to interrogate jury about alleged juror misconduct where defendant waited to hear the verdict before contesting jury’s impartiality); United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.1982) (en banc) (untimely notification of juror misconduct waives right to new trial even where actual prejudice can be shown).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul Wyatt
See, e.g., United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277, 1280 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 1884 , 76 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nanez
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-6453.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 25, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Missouri (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.