green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
S & M BRANDS, INC. v. Summers
See Wright v. Holbrook, 794 F.2d 1152, 1156 (6th Cir.1986) (“It is impermissible to mention an issue for the first time in a reply brief, because the appellee then has no opportunity to respond.”) (quoting Knighten v. Comm’r, 702 F.2d 59 , 60 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 249 , 78 L.Ed.2d 237 (1983)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dale E. Birdsell
See Knighten v. C.I.R., 702 F.2d 59 , 60 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 249 , 78 L.Ed.2d 237 (1983); Beerly v. Department of Treasury, 768 F.2d 942, 949 (7th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Whitney National Bank
(2×)
Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.1993); see also, Knighten v. C.I.R., 702 F.2d 59, 60 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 249 , 78 L.Ed.2d 237 (1983) (forbidding parties from raising issues for the first time in the reply brief).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Spriggs
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 83-5275.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1983.
Published
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Cer-tiorari denied.