green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.4 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1984 ·
…a simple majority of the voting active judges is required to grant a rehearing
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Liu v. Republic of China
(2×)
But cf. Clayco Petroleum Corp. v. Occidental Corp., 712 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984) (suggesting a willingness to limit judicial inquiries solely on the basis that they would “impugn or question the nobility of a foreign nation’s motivation”).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ida Mary Lewis v. University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Book Center
(4×)
a simple majority of the voting active judges is required to grant a rehearing
discussed
Cited "see"
Dillard v. Musgrove
(2×)
See Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, 712 F.2d 899 , 903 n. 3 (4th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984). ¶ 25.
cited
Cited "see"
W. O. \Chet\" Dillard v. Ronnie Musgrove"
See Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, 712 F.2d 899 , 903 n.3 (4th Cir. 1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 104 S. Ct. 703 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Keener v. State
See State v. Alaska Land Title Ass’n, 667 P.2d 714 (Alaska 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984); State, Dep’t of Highways v. Green, 586 P.2d 595 (Alaska 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Cerrato v. San Francisco Community College District
(2×)
See Bratton v. City of Detroit, 704 F.2d 878, 898 (6th Cir.1983) (“We find, however, that the issue of the validity of an affirmative action plan is a question of law, to be determined by the court and not the jury.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984); Setser v. Novack Investment Co., 657 F.2d 962, 969 (8th Cir.1981) (“The issue of the validity of an affirmative action plan is one for the court and not the jury.”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1064 , 102 S.Ct. 615 , 70 L.Ed.2d 601 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cain v. Armstrong World Industries
(2×)
See Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 712 F.2d 899 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983) and 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984) (New trial granted due to prejudicial effect of consolidation of actions against airlines and their insurers).
cited
Cited "see"
James v. State
See State v. Alaska Land Title Ass’n, 667 P.2d 714, 725 (Alaska 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chuidian v. Philippine National Bank
(2×)
See Clayco Petroleum Corp. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 712 F.2d 404, 408 (9th Cir. 1983) cert. denied 464 *421 U.S. 1040, 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984); Braka v. Bancomer, 762 F.2d 222 (2nd Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Insurance Company of North America, Inc. v. U.S. Gypsum Company, Inc.
(2×)
See Arnold v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 681 F.2d 186, 199-200 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 on rehearing, Arnold v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 712 F.2d 899 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Drago v. Celotex Corp.
(2×)
See Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 681 F.2d 186, 193 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983) and 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Messerli v. Department of Natural Resources
See State v. Alaska Land Title Ass’n, 667 P.2d 714, 725 (Alaska 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Environmental Tectonics v. W.S. Kirkpatrick, Inc.
(2×)
See id. at 1393 . 14 In reaching its conclusion, the district court relied primarily on the interpretation of the act of state doctrine advanced in a Ninth Circuit case, Clayco Petroleum v. Occidental Petroleum, 712 F.2d 404 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
(2×)
See 704 F.2d 878 (6th Cir.) (Bratton I ), modified, 712 F.2d 222 (6th Cir.1983) (Bratton II ), aff'g Baker v. City of Detroit, 504 F.Supp. 841 (E.D.Mich.1980), modifying 483 F.Supp. 930 (E.D.Mich.1979), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
N.A.A.C.P., Detroit Branch v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'n
(2×)
See 704 F.2d 878 (6th Cir.) (Bratton I), modified, 712 F.2d 222 (6th Cir.1983) (Bratton II), aff'g Baker v. City of Detroit, 504 F.Supp. 841 (E.D.Mich.1980), modifying 483 F.Supp. 930 (E.D.Mich.1979), cer t. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilmington Firefighters Local 1590 v. City of Wilmington
(2×)
See Bratton v. City of Detroit, 704 F.2d 878, 887 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984); E.E.O.C. v. McCall Printing Corp., 633 F.2d 1232 , 1237-38 (6th Cir.1980); Stotts, 679 F.2d at 558 (6th Cir.), rev'd on other grounds, 467 U.S. 561 , 104 S.Ct. 2576 , 81 L.Ed.2d 483 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marsh v. Board of Educ. of City of Flint
(2×)
See — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roxas v. Marcos
(2×)
See also Clayco Petroleum Corp. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 712 F.2d 404, 406 (9th Cir.1983) (“[Wjithout sovereign activity effectuating ‘public’ rather than private interests, the act of state doctrine does not apply.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Dunn Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. v. Hovic Amerada Hess Corp. Keene Corporation v. The Litwin Corporation Litwin Panamerican Corp. Borinquen Insulation Co. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation
(2×)
Co., 459 F.2d 468, 470 (3d Cir.1972), (trial judge has broad discretion in determining whether counsel's closing remarks were proper). 31 Here, the district court concluded that the remarks about corporate lies "are not improper in a summation regarding punitive damages," Dunn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass, 774 F.Supp. 929, 949 , relying on the trial court's statement in Herman that "[i]n attempting to convince a jury that a defendant's conduct was outrageous and should be punished, an advocate must go beyond the kind of argument necessary to establish ordinary negligence." 379 F.Supp. 1268, 127…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dunn v. HOVIC
(2×)
Here, the district court concluded that the remarks about corporate lies “are not improper in a summation regarding punitive damages,” Dunn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass, 774 F.Supp. 929, 949 , relying on the trial court’s statement in Herman that “[i]n attempting to convince a jury that a defendant’s conduct was outrageous and should be punished, an advocate must go beyond the kind of argument necessary to establish ordinary negligence.” 379 F.Supp. 1268, 1276 (D.V.I.1974) (footnote omitted), aff'd, 524 F.2d 767 (3d Cir.1975); see also Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 681 F.2d 186…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Malcolm v. National Gypsum Co.
(2×)
In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litig., 971 F.2d 831, 853 (2d Cir.1992); see also Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 712 F.2d 899, 906 (4th Cir.1983) (en banc) (“considerations of convenience may not prevail where the inevitable consequence to another party is harmful and serious prejudice”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984); Baker v. Waterman S.S.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Malcolm v. Keene Corporation
(2×)
The systemic urge to aggregate litigation must not be allowed to trump our dedication to individual justice, and we must take care that each individual plaintiff's--and defendant's--cause not be lost in the shadow of a towering mass litigation. 25 In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litig., 971 F.2d 831, 853 (2d Cir.1992); see also Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 712 F.2d 899, 906 (4th Cir.1983) (en banc) ("considerations of convenience may not prevail where the inevitable consequence to another party is harmful and serious prejudice"), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Billy Lamb and Carmon Willis v. Phillip Morris, Inc. And B.A.T. Industries, Plc
(2×)
See also Clayco Petroleum *1027 Corp. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 712 F.2d 404, 407-08 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984); Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68, 77 (2d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Flippo Construction Co. v. Mike Parks Diving Corp.
(2×)
As the federal court of appeals for the fifth circuit recently stated, however, “ ‘Where [an affirmative defense] is raised in the trial court in a manner that does not result in unfair surprise, ... technical failure to comply precisely with rule 8(c) is not fatal.’ ” Bull’s Corner Restaurant, Inc. v. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 759 F.2d 500, 502 (5th Cir.1985) (quoting Allied Chemical Corp. v. Mackay, 695 F.2d 854, 855 (5th Cir.1983)); see also Baker v. City of Detroit, 483 F.Supp. 919, 921 (E.D.Mich.1979) (“[W]hat matters is not whether the magic words ‘affirmative de…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Mary Kate LEAMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL RETARDATION & DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
(4×)
See, e.g., Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, 712 F.2d 899 (4th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
West v. MultiBanco Comermex
(2×)
See, e.g., Clayco Petroleum Corp. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 712 F.2d 404, 406-07 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jack West, Leroy Swanson, and Margarety Swanson, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Other Similarly Situated v. Multibanco Comermex, S.A., a Corp., Philip B. Thompson, Anrienne S. Thompson, Donald S. Logan, Etta A. Logan, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Bancomer, S.N.C., a Corp., George M. Davies, June H. Davies, Anthony J. Greco, Evelyn A. Greco, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Banco Nacional De Mexico, S.A. AKA Banamex, a Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., Clayco Petroleum Corp. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 712 F.2d 404, 406-07 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Harvey
(2×)
See also Bratton v. City of Detroit, 704 F.2d 878, 885 (6th Cir.) (“The Supreme Court has not provided the kind of guidance in the constitutional context that [it has] under Title VII”), modified, 712 F.2d 222 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
38 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1094, 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,484 Phillip Paradise, Jr., United States of America, Plaintiff-Amicus Curiae-Appellee, Cross-Appellant v. Byron Prescott, as Director of the Alabama Department of Public Safety, Cross-Appellee, V.E. McClellan Defendants-Intervenors, Appellants-Cross-Appellees
(2×)
Hence, "determining what [equal protection reverse discrimination] 'test' will eventually emerge from the Court is highly speculative." South Florida Chapter, 723 F.2d at 851 ; see also Bratton v. City of Detroit, 704 F.2d 878, 885 (6th Cir.) ("The Supreme Court has not provided the kind of guidance in the constitutional context that [it has] under Title VII"), modified, 712 F.2d 222 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984); Valentine v. Smith, 654 F.2d 503, 510 (8th Cir.) ("There is no [Supreme Court] consensus on what findings of past discrimination …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paradise v. Prescott
(2×)
Hence, “determining what [equal protection reverse discrimination] ‘test’ will eventually emerge from the Court is highly speculative.” South Florida Chapter, 723 F.2d at 851 ; see also Bratton v. City of Detroit, 704 F.2d 878, 885 (6th Cir.) (“The Supreme Court has not provided the kind of guidance in the constitutional context that [it has] under Title VII”), modified, 712 F.2d 222 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984); Valentine v. Smith, 654 F.2d 503, 510 (8th Cir.) (“There is no [Supreme Court] consensus on what findings of past disc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Humphreys, Hutcheson and Moseley v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor
See also Donovan v. Master Printers Association, 532 F.Supp. 1140 , 1148 n. 11 (N.D.Ill.1981) (court found that members’ allegations fell far below the level of reprisals articulated in NAACP v. Alabama and its progeny), aff'd and adopted, 699 F.2d 370 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arnold
v.
Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
v.
Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
No. 83-553.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (4) · E.D. Michigan (2)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.