green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Ford
irst, ... had a lawful right to be in the defendant's bedroom. the boots were in plain view, were not hidden in a closet....
cited
Cited "see"
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CARLEE M. BRENNAN (13-09-1079, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
See State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 228 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S. Ct. 1295 , 79 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Demetrius Cope (074206).
See State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 236 , 463 A.2d 320 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State of New Jersey v. Richard Bard
See State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 228 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S. Ct. 1295 , 79 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bard
See State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 228 , 463 A.2d 320 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Antoine D. Watts(074556)
See State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 228 , 463 A.2d 320 (1983) (“There are numerous situations that arise in law enforcement that are unique and call for a special response.”), cert, denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Edmonds
See State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 219 , 463 A.2d 320 (1983) (holding that under Article I, Paragraph 7, “the proper inquiry for determining the constitutionality of a search-and-seizure is whether the conduct of the law enforcement officer who undertook the search was objectively reasonable, without regard to his or her underlying motives or intent”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984); State v. Brown, 205 N.J. 133, 146 , 14 A.3d 26 (2011).
cited
Cited "see"
Centeno-Bernuy v. Perry
See Holt v. Continental Group, 708 F.2d 87, 91 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1294 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Morrison
See State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 219 , 463 A. 2d 320 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 695 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Padilla
See State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 236-37 , 463 A.2d 320 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 695 (1984); State v. Damplias, 282 N.J.Super. 471, 477-78 , 660 A.2d 570 (App.Div.1995).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lark
See State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 235-39 , 463 A. 2d 320 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Shady v. Tyson
See Holt v. Continental Group, Inc., 708 F.2d 87, 90-91 (2d Cir.1983), cert, denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1294 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Navarro
Ed.2d at 713 ; see State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 216-17 , 463 A.2d 320 (1983) , cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gethers v. United States
To guard against such confusion, we previously instructed trial courts that “before evidence of the guilt of another can be deemed relevant and thereby admissible, the evidence must clearly link that other person to the commission of the crime.” Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093, 1097 (D.C.1979) (citations omitted); accord, Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796, 803 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Pinckney v. Board of Education of the Westbury Union Free School District
See Holt v. Continental Group, Inc., 708 F.2d 87, 90-91 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1294 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clark v. United States
(2×)
See Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796, 799 (D.C.1983) (decision on whether a mistrial should be declared has always been committed to the sound discretion of the trial court and as such, on appeal, a decision should be reversed only in extreme situations threatening a miscarriage of justice), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Arbelaez
See United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 813 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Battle v. United States
Cf. Super.Ct.Crim.R. 30; FED.R.EVID. 105; see JACK WEINSTEIN & MARGARET BENDER, WEINSTEIN ON EVIDENCE ¶ 105 [05] (Matthew Bender rev.1992). [23] The grant or denial of a motion for a mistrial is left to the trial judge's discretion, and such a denial will be reversed only in "extreme situations threatening a miscarriage of justice." Rambert v. United States, 602 A.2d 1117, 1120 (D.C.1992) (quoting Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796, 799 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984)).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Watson
See State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 219 , 463 A. 2d 320 (1988), cert. den., 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 *178 S.Ct. 1295, 79 L.Ed. 2d 695 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. George
See State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 219 , 463 A. 2d 320 (1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 695 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Collins v. United States
See Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796, 802 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); Scott v. United States, 412 A.2d 364, 367-68 (D.C.1980); D.C.Code § 14-102 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eisenberg
See United States v. Swann, 441 F.2d 1053, 1055 (D.C.Cir.1971). 27 The courts which have ruled that the crime of obstruction of justice occurs where the obstructed proceedings took place have reasoned that the language of 18 U.S.C. § 1503 indicates that the primary concern of Congress was the effect of the obstruction on the proceedings in question. 28 See United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 654, 659 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984); Barham, 666 F.2d at 523-24 ; Tedesco, 635 F.2d at 905 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Manuel Vasquez and Jose Pollo Renteria
See United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 814 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio J. White, and Consolidated Case No. 88-3083
See United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 654, 662 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. W. Otis Culpepper
Monroe, 833 F.2d at 100 (citations omitted); accord United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 814 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Turcotte
See State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 235-236 , 463 A. 2d 320 (1983), cert. den. 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 695 (1984). [2] *299 Defendants also argue that the evidence seized should have been suppressed because the State failed to produce the official chemist's written notice of a positive test result that triggered the state steward's authority for a search under N.J.A.C. 13:71-23.5.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. United States
See Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796, 799 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); Khaalis v. United States, 408 A.2d 313, 346-47 (D.C.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1092 , 100 S.Ct. 1059 , 62 L.Ed.2d 781 (1980); Watkins v. United States, 379 A.2d 703, 708 (D.C.1977) (quoting Williams v. United States, 228 A.2d 846, 848 (D.C.1967)).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Murdock
(2×)
See New Jersey v. Bruzzese, 463 A.2d 320, 332-333 (N.J. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 (1984). " '[P]hysical entry of the home is the chief evil against which the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed.' " Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 585 (1980) (quoting United States v. United States District Court, 407 U.S. 297, 313 [1972]).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Anderson
See State v. Bruzzese (1983), 94 N.J. 210 , 463 A.2d 320 , cert. denied (1984), 465 U.S. 1030 , 79 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Hall v. United States
See Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796, 800 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); Kitt v. United States, 379 A.2d 973, 975 (D.C.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Russell Hobson, Russell Hobson v. United States
See U.S. v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 654, 662 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984); Bentley v. U.S., 701 F.2d 897, 899 (11th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roman
Accord United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 817 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alberto Pena, Juan Urena
See United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 814-15 (3d Cir.1983) (discussing legislative history of § 3161(h)(7) in greater detail), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barry Jay Feldman
See United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 815 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984) ("Congress urged that any exclusions allowed under [ 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(1)(F)] be guided by local court rules governing motions practice.”) The Local Rules do not provide for an "ex parte motion.” Feldman asserts that ex parte motions do not fall within the statutory phrase "pretrial motion," and that the effect of characterizing ex parte motions in this way would be that the speedy trial clock would never run to seventy days because of the pervasive frequenc…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ray C. Broce and Broce Construction Company, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 818 (3d Cir.1983) (citing United States v. Mallah, 503 F.2d 971, 985-87 (2d Cir.1974)), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984). "[I]t is the government which has control over the drafting of indictments.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bogan
Sergeant Donato was lawfully on the premises when he observed defendant, and given the plain view doctrine, the police did not have to wait for judicial permission to question and eventually take defendant into custody. 10 See Frankel, supra, 179 N.J. at 599-600, 610, 847 A.2d 561 (holding that evidence observed in plain view and seized by police *80 officer who is lawfully on premises is admissible (citing Mincey, supra, 437 U.S. at 393 , 98 S.Ct. at 2413 , 57 L.Ed.2d at 300 )); see also State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 237 , 463 A.2d 320 (1983) (“We do not believe that a police officer lawf…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Diloreto
Rather, we must evaluate, from an objective point of view, whether the officers acted reasonably at the time of their challenged conduct and reasonably believed their conduct was "`totally divorced from the detection, investigation or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute.'" State v. Stott, 171 N.J. 343, 361 , 794 A. 2d 120, 130-31 (2002) (expectation of privacy in room of psychiatric hospital; search of psychiatric patient's room not subject to "community caretaking" exception); see also State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 220 , 463 A. 2d 320 (1983) (employing ob…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Arthur
Terry, supra, 392 U.S. at 21-22, 88 S.Ct. at 1880 , 20 L.Ed.2d at 906 ; see also State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 219-21 , 463 A.2d 320 (1983) (holding that probable cause to search is based objectively on the understanding of an experienced and reasonable police officer), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Winfield v. United States
(2×)
See also Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796, 803 (D.C.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Alston
See also, State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 219-21 , 463 A. 2d 320 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 695 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
NEW JERSEY DEP v. Duran
Super. 21 , 588 A. 2d 834 (App.Div. 1991); see also State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 220 , 463 A. 2d 320 (1983) cert. denied 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 695 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Beale
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 641 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984). 61 A defendant seeking a motion for severance in order to obtain exculpatory testimony from a co-defendant must show: (1) a legitimate need for the testimony; (2) the substance of the testimony; (3) its exculpatory nature and effect, and (4) that the co-defendant will in fact testify at the separate trial.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Beale
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633, 641 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lewis
See also State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 236 (1983) (“[T]he police officer must be lawfully in the viewing area.”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Travelers Mortgage Services
See also Holt v. Continental Group, Inc., 708 F.2d 87, 91 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1294 , 79 L.Ed.2d 695 (1984) (recognizing that the “risks that other employees may be deterred from protecting their rights ... or providing testimony” may constitute irreparable harm). 6 This court does not accept plaintiffs assertion that there is a presumption of irreparable injury in an action by a plaintiff alleging retaliatory discharge under CEPA.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Tobin
It felt that the efficiency and economy of joint trials far outweighed the desirability of granting a severance where the criterion was simply the passage of time.” Id. at 1359; see also United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 814-15 (3d Cir.1983) (discussing legislative history of § 3161(h)(7) in greater detail), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Coburn
See also State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 219-220 (1983), cert. den. 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 695 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sugar
(2×)
It has often been noted that "physical entry of the home is the chief evil against which the wording of the fourth amendment is directed." United States v. United States District Court, 407 U.S. 297, 313 , 92 S.Ct. 2125, 2134 , 32 L.Ed. 2d 752, 764 (1972); see also State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 217 (1983) ("Historically, the Court has applied a more stringent standard of the fourth amendment to searches of a residential dwelling."), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 695 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Darnell GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John C. LAWN, D.E.A. Administrator, Defendant-Appellee
See e.g., Holt v. Continental Group, Inc., 708 F.2d 87, 91 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 1038, 104 S.Ct. 1294 , 1316, 79 L.Ed.2d 695 , 712 (1984); Hyland v. Kenner Products Co., 10 FEP 367, 378 (S.D.Ohio 1974); B.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cohen
See, e.g., State v. Bruzzese, 94 N.J. 210, 216 (1983), cert. den. 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1295 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 695 (1984); State v. Alston, 88 N.J. 211, 226 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Miller
v.
Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
v.
Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
No. 83-5349.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: New Jersey Superior Court App … (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.