green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"A person has no greater right of privacy in another's home than in his own"
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Cleveland
a person has no greater right of privacy in another's home than in his own
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Asbury
(2×)
See United States v. Underwood, 717 F.2d 482 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1309 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984). [2] One officer testified as follows: Q: You testified there were no lights before, didn't you?
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph E. Whitfield v. Major Sam Smith
See United States v. Johnson, 720 F.2d 519, 521-22 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Hutton, In re
See United States v. Hollis, 718 F.2d 277, 280 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronnie Darnell Miller
See United States v. Janoe, 720 F.2d 1156, 1164 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wesley C. Paxson, Sr.
See United States v. Bridges, 717 F.2d 1444, 1448 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel McIntosh
Accord, United States v. Underwood, 717 F.2d 482, 483 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1309 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984) (upholding search of residence of subject of arrest warrant).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Neither
See People v. Payne (1983), 98 Ill. 2d 45 , 456 N.E.2d 44 , cert. denied (1984), 465 U.S. 1036 , 79 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Burton Devore, Jr.
See United States v. Johnson, 720 F.2d 519, 522 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984); United States v. Young, 702 F.2d 133, 137 (8th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Lewis v. Sheriffs Dept. For the City of St. Louis
See United States v. Johnson, 720 F.2d 519, 521 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. E.W. Freeman
See United States v. Janoe, 720 F.2d 1156, 1159 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Hennessey
See to the same effect, United States v. Janoe, 720 F.2d 1156, 1161 (10th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodney Earl White, United States of America v. Raul Garcia Silva
See United States v. Johnson, 720 F.2d 519, 522 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984). 2 White also alleges that certain prosecutorial comments made during closing argument constitute reversible error.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Edward Rambo
United States v. Clifford, 664 F.2d 1090, 1092 (8th Cir.1981); accord United States v. Underwood, 717 F.2d 482, 484 (9th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1309 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984); United States v. Robinson, 698 F.2d 448, 454 (D.C.Cir. 1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gennaro Langella
See United States v. Bridges, 717 F.2d 1444, 1448-51 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. de *1083 nied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Watt
See, e.g., United States v. Bridges, 717 F.2d 1444 (D.C.Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ira W. Nichol, Cross-Appellee v. Pullman Standard, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellants
See also United States v. Underwood, 717 F.2d 482, 484-486 (9th Cir.1983) (en banc), certiorari denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1309 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Taylor
See, e.g., United States v. Bridges, 717 F.2d 1444 , 1448 & n. 18 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984); United States v. Goguen, 723 F.2d 1012 , 1016 & n. 4 (1st Cir.1983); United States v. Weiss, 752 F.2d 777, 786 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 944 , 106 S.Ct. 308 , 88 L.Ed.2d 285 (1985); United States v. Slawik, 548 F.2d 75 , 79 & n. 8 (3d Cir.1977); United States v. Bailey, 769 F.2d 203, 203 (4th Cir.1985); United States v. Thompson, 637 F.2d 267, 268 (5th Cir.1981); United States v. Seltzer, 794 F.2d 1114, 1123 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dillard v. Baldwin County Commission
See, e.g., Mirrione v. Anderson, 717 F.2d 743, 744-45 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1308 , 79 L.Ed.2d 706 (1984) (interest in avoiding diminution of black voting strength outweighed problems caused by splitting Rosedale, New York, four ways); cf. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 579-81 , 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1390-91 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506 (1964) (preserving integrity of political boundaries cannot outweigh right to vote).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Duane Brown
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 720 F.2d 519, 522-23 (8th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984); United States v. Bogers, 635 F.2d 749, 751 (8th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Earl Paul Snyder
Whether “to call a particular witness is a tactical decision and, thus, a matter of discretion for trial counsel.” United States v. Miller, 643 F.2d 713, 714 (10th Cir.1981); see also United States v. Janoe, 720 F.2d 1156, 1162 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1310 , 79 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984); United States v. Glick, 710 F.2d 639, 644 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 995 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alphonse Castaldi v. United States
Our power to review the severity of a criminal sentence is narrowly limited to those rare cases where the district court has “manifestly or grossly abused its discretion” such that the severity of the sentence “shocks the judicial conscience.” Woosley, 478 F.2d at 147 ; see also United States v. Hollis, 718 F.2d 277, 279 (8th Cir.1983) (sentence within statutory maximum reviewable only if it is “ ‘greatly excessive under traditional concepts of justice’ or ‘manifestly disproportionate to the crime or criminal’ ”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1036 , 104 S.Ct. 1309 , 79 L.Ed.2d 70…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mirrione
v.
Anderson
v.
Anderson
No. 83-6019.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: New Jersey Superior Court App … (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.