Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 465 U.S. 1038 (1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 465 U.S. 1038 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
157 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 34 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Association for Intercollegiate Athletics for Women v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n (cadc, 1984-05-18) · Strongest negative: James T. Martin, Jr. v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, Richard Xander, James T. Martin, Jr. v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, Richard Xander (cadc, 1987-05-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" James T. Martin, Jr. v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, Richard Xander, James T. Martin, Jr. v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, Richard Xander
D.C. Cir. · 1987 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Ellsberg v. Mitchell, 709 F.2d 51, 66-69 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1316 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984) (placing burden on defendant).
cited Cited "but see" Martin v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
D.C. Cir. · 1987 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Ellsberg v. Mitchell, 709 F.2d 51, 66-69 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1316 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984) (placing burden on defendant).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Association for Intercollegiate Athletics for Women v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · confidence medium
See Northrup Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 705 F.2d 1030, 1058 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 156 , 78 L.Ed.2d 144 (1983); Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 703 F.2d 534, 545 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 104 S, Ct. 1315, 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Hook v. State of Ariz.
D. Ariz. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Halderman v. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp., 673 F.2d 628 , 637 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984). 22 Rather, an order by a court with subject matter and personal jurisdiction must be obeyed by the parties until reversed by orderly and proper proceedings, “without regard for even the constitutionality of the Act under which the order was issued.” United States v. United Mine Workers of Am., 330 U.S. 258, 293 , 67 S.Ct. 677, 695 , 91 L.Ed. 884 (1947).
discussed Cited "see" Harris v. City of Philadelphia
3rd Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Halderman v. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp., 673 F.2d 628 , 638 (3d Cir.1982) (in banc), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984); see also Newman v. Graddick, 740 F.2d 1513 (11th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see" Harris v. City of Philadelphia
3rd Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Halderman v. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp., 673 F.2d 628 , 638 (3d Cir.1982) (in banc), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984); see also Newman v. Graddick, 740 F.2d 1513 (11th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see" Harris v. City of Philadelphia
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hosp., 673 F.2d 628 , 637-39 (3d Cir.1982) (in banc ) (declining to address a defense to a civil contempt citation that had not first been presented to the district court through a motion under Rule 60(b)), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984). 28 Although we would have the undisputed discretion to view the City's failure to raise these issues in the district court as a waiver, a practice this court generally follows, in light of the strong public interest in the subject matter of these decrees, we will not do so in this…
discussed Cited "see" Harris v. City of Philadelphia
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hosp., 673 F.2d 628 , 637-39 (3d Cir.1982) (in banc) (declining to address a defense to a civil contempt citation that had not first been presented to the district court through a motion under Rule 60(b)), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Bentzlin v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
C.D. Cal. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ellsberg v. Mitchell, 709 F.2d 51, 65 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1316 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Zuckerbraun v. General Dynamics Corporation
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ellsberg v. Mitchell, 709 F.2d 51, 65 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1316 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984). 8 A court before which the privilege is asserted must assess the validity of the claim of privilege, satisfying itself that there is a reasonable danger that disclosure of the particular facts in litigation will jeopardize national security.
cited Cited "see" Zuckerbraun v. General Dynamics Corp.
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ellsberg v. Mitchell, 709 F.2d 51, 65 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1316 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Flick v. Borg-Warner Corporation
3rd Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hosp., 673 F.2d 628 , 639 (3d Cir.1982) (in banc) (citing Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120 , 96 S.Ct. 2868, 2877 , 49 L.Ed.2d 826 (1976)), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984); East Coast Tender Serv., Inc. v. Robert F. Winzinger, Inc., 759 F.2d 280 , 284 (3d Cir.1985).
discussed Cited "see" Flick v. Borg-Warner Corp.
3rd Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hosp., 673 F.2d 628 , 639 (3d Cir.1982) (in banc) (citing Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120 , 96 S.Ct. 2868, 2877 , 49 L.Ed.2d 826 (1976)), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984); East Coast Tender Serv., Inc. v. Robert F. Winzinger, Inc., 759 F.2d 280 , 284 (3d Cir.1985).
discussed Cited "see" Boise Cascade Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 703 F.2d 534 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Thermice Corporation v. Vistron Corporation, Standard Oil Chemical Company (Formerly Vistron Corporation) (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital, 673 F.2d 628, 636 (3d Cir.1982) (in banc), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984); Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers, 545 F.2d 1336, 1340 (3d Cir.1976); Cromaglass Corporation v. Ferm, 500 F.2d 601, 604 (3d Cir.1974) (in banc).
discussed Cited "see" Souza v. Estate of Bishop
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foremost Pro Color, 703 F.2d 534 , 545-46 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984). 4 United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 110 F.Supp. 295 (D.Mass.1953), aff'd per curiam, 347 U.S. 521 , 74 S.Ct. 699 , 98 L.Ed. 910 (1954), is not to the contrary.
discussed Cited "see" Souza v. Estate of Bishop
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foremost Pro Color, 703 F.2d 534 , 545-46 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984). 4 19 United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 110 F.Supp. 295 (D.Mass.1953), aff'd per curiam, 347 U.S. 521 , 74 S.Ct. 699 , 98 L.Ed. 910 (1954), is not to the contrary.
discussed Cited "see" Arcamuzi v. Continental Air Lines, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holt v. Continental Group, Inc., 708 F.2d 87, 91 (2d Cir.1983) (chilling effect caused by retaliatory discharge for exercise of Title VII rights may constitute irreparable injury), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1316 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" William Arcamuzi v. Continental Air Lines, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holt v. Continental Group, Inc., 708 F.2d 87, 91 (2d Cir.1983) (chilling effect caused by retaliatory discharge for exercise of Title VII rights may constitute irreparable injury), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1316 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984). 14 Similarly, the RLA statutorily protects the right of association and expression in union activities from interference by employers.
discussed Cited "see" Fitzgerald v. Penthouse International, Ltd.
4th Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Where there is a strong showing of necessity, the claim of privilege should not be lightly accepted, but even the most compelling necessity cannot overcome the claim of privilege if the court is ultimately satisfied that military secrets are at stake. 13 Id. at 11 , 73 S.Ct. at 533-34 ; accord Ellsberg v. Mitchell, 709 F.2d 51 , 59 nn. 37-38 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1316 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Fitzgerald v. Penthouse International Ltd.
4th Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Id. at 11 , 73 S.Ct. at 533-34 ; accord Ellsberg v. Mitchell, 709 F.2d 51 , 59 nn. 37-38 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1316 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Rogers Transportation, Inc. v. Stern
3rd Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital, 673 F.2d 628, 638 (3d Cir.1982) (in banc), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Rogers Transportation, Inc., No. 84-3493 v. Honorable Herbert J. Stern, U.S.D.J. For the District of New Jersey, United States of America and Scott R. Hammond, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Rogers Transportation, Inc., No. 84-5556
3rd Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital, 673 F.2d 628, 638 (3d Cir.1982) (in banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Airweld, Inc. v. Airco, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 703 F.2d 534, 543 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Goodwin v. LaPolla
N.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Holt v. The Continental Group, Inc., 708 F.2d 87, 90 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1316 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984) (citing National Ass’n of Letter Carriers v. Sombrotto, 449 F.2d 915, 921 (2d Cir.1971); Westchester Lodge 2186 v. Railway Express Agency, 329 F.2d 748 , 752 (2d Cir.1964)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Nicholson
E.D. Va. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Circuit rejected argument that FISA violates Fifth and Sixth Amendments); Spanjol, 720 F.Supp. at 58 ; United States v. Ott, 637 F.Supp. 62 (E.D.Cal.1986), aff'd, 827 F.2d 473 (9th Cir.1987); In the Matter of Kevork, 634 F.Supp. at 1010 ; Hovsepian, 1985 WL 5970 at *2; Falvey, 540 F.Supp. at 1312-13 ; see also Ellsberg v. Mitchell, 709 F.2d 51 , 66 n. 66 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, sub nom Russo v. Mitchell, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1316 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984) (noting that FISA had theretofore survived all constitutional challenges). 8 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Don Williams, AKA Donald Williams v. I.B. Fischer Nevada I.B. Fischer Properties, Inc. Ira Fischbein Foodmaker, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
We need go no farther in guessing the argument because “a § 1 claim insufficient to withstand summary judgment cannot be used as the sole basis for a § 2 claim.” Thomsen, 680 F.2d at 1267; see also Foremost Pro Color Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 703 F.2d 534, 543 (9th Cir.1983) (because conduct alleged in support of section 1 claim not anticompetitive, it “is of no assistance” in attempt to state section 2 claim), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Francis George Hinkleman v. Shell Oil Company (2×)
4th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 703 F.2d 534, 546 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984); see also 16 C.F.R. § 240.7 (1991); Kintner § 27.6.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thomas J. Kline, Inc. v. Lorillard, Inc. (2×)
4th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 703 F.2d 534, 547-48 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984) (dismissing plaintiff’s § 13(a) claim); Cemar v. Nissan Motor Corp., 678 F.Supp. 1091, 1100-01 (D.Del.1988) (dismissing claim against defendants); O’Connell v. Citrus Bowl, Inc., 99 F.R.D. 117 (E.D.N.Y. 1983) (although conceding possibility of § 13(a) liability, court denied motion to cer tify plaintiff class); L.S.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Samuel Loring Morison, the Washington Post Cbs, Inc., Amici Curiae
4th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ellsberg v. Mitchell, 709 F.2d 51, 59 (D.C.Cir.1983) cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1316 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984), in which the issue arose whether certain material dealing with intelligence operations met the test of "relating to national defense" and whether as such it was protected as a state secret.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Oahu Gas Service, Inc. v. Pacific Resources Inc., Gasco, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 703 F.2d 534, 545 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984); California Computer Products v. I.B.M.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Oahu Gas Service, Inc. v. Pacific Resources Inc., Gasco, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 703 F.2d 534, 545 (9th Cir.1983), cert, denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984); California Computer Products v. I.B.M.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz (2×)
7th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, e.g., Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 703 F.2d 534, 542-46 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984) (a monopolist need not make essential technology available to a would-be competitor and need not articulate a good reason for withholding the technology). 202 There is, of course, another possibility: that a market with two firms is not a natural monopoly.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Dairy King, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc.
D. Maryland · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Foremost Pro-Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak, 703 F.2d 534 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1038 , 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Association For Intercollegiate Athletics For Women v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 703 F.2d 534, 545-46 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1315 , 79 L.Ed.2d 712 (1984); Northeastern Tel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Foremost Pro Color, Inc.
v.
Eastman Kodak Co.
No. 82-1876.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1984.
465 U.S. 1038
Black, Certiorari, Issues, Robinson.
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Black-mun would grant certiorari on the Robinson-Patman Act issues.