Shaw v. Neece, 466 U.S. 976 (1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Shaw v. Neece, 466 U.S. 976 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Swoboda v. Dubach (ca10, 1993-05-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Swoboda v. Dubach
10th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shaw v. Neece, 727 F.2d 947, 949 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 976 , 104 S.Ct. 2358 , 80 L.Ed.2d 830 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Swoboda v. Dubach
10th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shaw v. Neece, 727 F.2d 947, 949 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 976 , 104 S.Ct. 2358 , 80 L.Ed.2d 830 (1984).
cited Cited "see" John D. Brown v. Robert H. Butler, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent
5th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Diaz v. Martin, 718 F.2d 1372, 1377 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 976 , 104 S.Ct. 2358 , 80 L.Ed.2d 830 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Gil Ricardo Gavilan
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Diaz v. Martin, 718 F.2d 1372, 1379 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2358 , 80 L.Ed.2d 830 (1984); Timmreck, supra, 441 U.S. at 784 , 99 S.Ct. at 2087 , 60 L.Ed.2d at 638 (1979). 13 .
discussed Cited "see" In Re Kansas Congressional Districts Reapportionment Cases. Pat O'Sullivan John Schmidt Leonard Moore Eva Jane Vaughn Verdis Robinson Mary Ladesic Alois G. Befort, Jr., and Nathaniel Watson v. Jack H. Brier, Secretary of State of the State of Kansas, Walter W. Carson Paul N. Bahnmaier J. Kurt Von Achen, and Vallerie Ann Miller v. John Carlin, Governor of the State of Kansas, and Jack H. Brier, Secretary of State of the State of Kansas
10th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shaw v. Neece, 727 F.2d 947, 949-50 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 2358 , 80 L.Ed.2d 830 (1984). 18 Are the Plaintiffs' Lawyers Entitled to Additional Fees? 19 Our reaction to this is that both sets of plaintiffs are entitled to an additional award of attorney's fees and expenses for defending their original awards on this appeal.
cited Cited "see" O'Sullivan v. Brier
10th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shaw v. Neece, 727 F.2d 947, 949-50 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S.—, 104 S.Ct. 2358 , 80 L.Ed.2d 830 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Coades v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Blair v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 78 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 41 , 467 A.2d 71 (1983), cert. denied U.S. , 80 L.Ed. 2d 830 (1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arnold v. State
Alaska Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Diaz v. Martin, 718 F.2d 1372, 1378 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2358 , 80 L.Ed.2d 830 (1984); Scott v. Wainwright, 698 F.2d 427, 429 (11th Cir.1983); Tinlin v. Parratt, 680 F.2d 48, 50 (8th Cir.1982); Hawkman v. Parratt, 661 F.2d 1161, 1168-69 (8th Cir. 1981); Via v. Superintendent, Powhatan Correctional Center, 643 F.2d 167, 171 (4th Cir.1981); State v. Cameron, 30 Wash. App. 229 , 633 P.2d 901, 904 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shaw
v.
Neece
No. 83-6472.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 1984.
466 U.S. 976
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.