Enright v. Bd. of Sch. Directors, 469 U.S. 966 (1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Enright v. Bd. of Sch. Directors, 469 U.S. 966 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
108 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mason v. Texaco, Inc. (ksd, 1990-07-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Mason v. Texaco, Inc.
D. Kan. · 1990 · confidence medium
Defendant also attempts to distinguish this case from the facts of Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984), in which the manufacturer played down reports that it did not consider convincing *1516 until it “could be entirely, satisfied that the product was causing damage.” Id. at 419, 681 P.2d at 1063 .
discussed Cited "see" Johnson & Johnson v. Aetna Cas.
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P. 2d 1038 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 301 (1984); Racer v. Utterman, 629 S.W. 2d 387 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 26 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 42 (1982).
cited Cited "see" State v. Brown
N.J. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Harris, 36 Cal. 3d 36 , 201 Cal. Rptr. 782, 801 , 679 P. 2d 433, 452 , cert. denied 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 301 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Patton v. TIC United Corp.
D. Kan. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038 , cert denied 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984); State ex rel.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Curtis
usnmcmilrev · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Harris, 36 Cal.3d 36 , 201 Cal.Rptr. 782 , 679 P.2d 433 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984); Wilson v. State, 250 Ga. 630 , 300 S.E.2d 640 (1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 199 , 78 L.Ed.2d 174 (1983); State v. Goodman, 298 N.C. 1 , 257 S.E.2d 569 (1979).
cited Cited "see" Menne v. Celotex Corporation
10th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038, 1054 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Menne v. Celotex Corp.
10th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038, 1054 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Tillman (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Utah · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Harris, 36 Cal.3d 36, 57 , 679 P.2d 433, 445 , 201 Cal. Rptr. 782, 794 (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984); United States v. Gordon, 493 F.Supp. 814, 820-21 (N.D.N.Y.1980) and authorities cited therein, aff'd, 655 F.2d 478 (2d Cir.1981). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Quigley
W.D. Mich. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, United States v. Kennedy, 726 F.2d 546, 547-48 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984) (quoting United States v. Glanton, 707 F.2d 1238 (11th Cir.1983) (The traditional test of multiplicity “determines whether each count ‘requires proof of a fact which the other does not.’ ”) The one court which has considered the multiplicity argument in the context of § 844(i) and § 924(c) rejected the defendant’s challenge.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mattingly, Inc. v. Beatrice Foods Company
10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038, 1061 , cert denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984), quoting Cantrell v. Amarillo Hardware Co., 226 Kan. 681 , 602 P.2d 1326, 1331 (1979) (quoting Sanders v. Park Towne, Ltd., 2 Kan.App.2d 313 , 578 P.2d 1131, 1136 (1978)) (Punitive damages "are allowed not because of any special merit in the injured party's case, but are imposed by way of punishing the wrongdoer ... the purpose being to restrain and deter others from the commission of like wrongs.").
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mattingly, Inc. v. Beatrice Foods Co.
10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038, 1061 , cert denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984), quoting Cantrell v. Amarillo Hardware Co., 226 Kan. 681 , 602 P.2d 1326, 1331 (1979) (quoting Sanders v. Park Towne, Ltd., 2 Kan.App.2d 313, 578 P.2d 1131, 1136 (1978)) (Punitive damages “are allowed not because of any special merit in the injured party’s case, but are imposed by way of punishing the wrongdoer ... the purpose being to restrain and deter others from the commission of like wrongs.”).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Michael Stephen Lancellotti
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Kennedy, 726 F.2d 546, 548 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Enright
v.
Board of School Directors of the City of Milwaukee
No. 84-331.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1984.
469 U.S. 966
Certiorari, Deny, Jurisdiction, Want, White, Writ.
Published

Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.

Justice White and Justice O’Connor would deny the petition for writ of certiorari for want of jurisdiction.