green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
“e must view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the government. if the evidence is such that a reasonable mind might fairly find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the denial of defendant's motion for acquittal must be affirmed.”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Michael C. Pennyman
e must view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the government. if the evidence is such that a reasonable mind might fairly find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the denial of defendant's motion for acquittal must be affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Patel
See United States v. Levy, 741 F.2d 915, 924 (7th Cir.) (failure to object to testimony at trial limits review to the identifica *993 tion of a plain error), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 440 , 83 L.Ed.2d 366 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott Payne
See United States v. Holloway, 740 F.2d 1373, 1383 (6th Cir.) (stating this rule with respect to probation and noting the dual goals of probation of rehabilitating the defendant and protecting the public), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 440 , 83 L.Ed.2d 366 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles E. Coleman
See United States v. Holloway, 731 F.2d 378, 381 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 440 , 83 L.Ed.2d 366 (1984) ("[W]e must view the evidence and all the reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the government.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wallace E. Ehrhart v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
See generally section XVIII of the Practitioner’s Handbook for Appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. "[T]he shotgun inclusion of issues may be the basis of hitting the target with something but still runs the risk of obscuring the significant issues by dilution.” United States v. Levy, 741 F.2d 915, 924 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 440 , 83 L.Ed.2d 366 (1984). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Miller
See United States v. Del Prado-Montero, 740 F.2d 113, 115 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 441 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 366 (1984); 469 U.S. 1042 , 105 S.Ct. 527 , 83 L.Ed.2d 415 (1984); 469 U.S. 1164 , 105 S.Ct. 924 , 83 L.Ed.2d 936 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Kelley
See United States v. Holloway, 740 F.2d 1373, 1377 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 440 , 83 L.Ed.2d 366 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas James Savoca
(2×)
See United States v. Holloway, 740 F.2d 1373, 1375 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 440 , 83 L.Ed.2d 366 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kakaygeesick v. Salazar
Yarborough v. Gentry, 540 U.S. 1, 5 , 124 S.Ct. 1 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1 (2003); see also, Gagan v. American Cablevision, Inc., 77 F.3d 951, 955 (7th Cir.1996) ("Losers in a trial can go hunting for relief on appeal with a rifle or a shotgun,” and "[t]he rifle is better,” "[a]s * * * the shotgun approach may hit the target with something but it runs the risk of obscuring significant issues by dilution.”), citing United States v. Levy, 741 F.2d 915, 924 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 440 , 83 L.Ed.2d 366 (1984). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vijay Parekh
See also United States v. Levy, 741 F.2d 915, 921-22 (7th Cir.) ("An actual desire to inflict harm on the bank is not required.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 440 , 83 L.Ed.2d 366 (1984); United States v. Krepps, 605 F.2d 101, 104 (3d Cir.1979); United States v. Larson, 581 F.2d 664, 667 (7th Cir.1978); United States v. Killian, 541 F.2d 1156, 1159-60 (5th Cir.1976); United States v. Schmidt, 471 F.2d 385, 386 (3d Cir.1972) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Samuel M. Chaimson
(2×)
See also United States v. Levy, 741 F.2d 915, 924 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 440 , 83 L.Ed.2d 366 (1984); United States v. Jordan, 722 F.2d 353, 357 (7th Cir.1983); Weidman, 572 F.2d at 1201-02 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holloway
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-5536.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.