Hoskins v. United States, 469 U.S. 1073 (1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Hoskins v. United States, 469 U.S. 1073 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“beyond doubt, the legislative intent of this provision was to make the ordinary law of agency applicable to'the attribution of individual acts to both employers and unions.”
532 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 101 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Overnite Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 728, Intervenor (cadc, 1998-04-07) · Strongest negative: Minnieweather v. Brumley (lactapp, 1992-06-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" Minnieweather v. Brumley
La. Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see In re Lindberg, 735 F.2d 1087 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 566 , 83 L.Ed.2d 507 (1984); In re Kao, 52 B.R. 452 (BC Ore.1985); In re Salamone, 46 B.R. 19 , 12 BCD 757, 12 CBC 2d 517 (BC E.D.N.Y.1984); In re Wanderlich, 36 B.R. 710 (BC W.D.N.Y.1984); In re Tracy, 28 B.R. 189 , 10 BCD541, 8 CBC 2d 440 (BC Me.1983).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Overnite Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 728, Intervenor
D.C. Cir. · 1998 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
beyond doubt, the legislative intent of this provision was to make the ordinary law of agency applicable to'the attribution of individual acts to both employers and unions.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Kettenbach v. Demoulas (2×)
D. Mass. · 1995 · confidence medium
Id. at 515-16.
examined Cited as authority (rule) ca8 1987 (5×)
8th Cir. · 1987 · confidence medium
Id. at 523.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Cerro Gordo Charity v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance (5×)
8th Cir. · 1987 · confidence medium
Id. at 523.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Rauenhorst v. United States
D. Minnesota · 1985 · confidence medium
Id. at 515.
cited Cited "see" Chainy v. Smith
Bankr. E.D. Tex. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc., 733 F.2d 509, 521 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 83 L.
discussed Cited "see" Pamela Sue Wolfe v. State
Tex. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Craig, 861 F.2d 818, 822 (5th Cir. 1988) (“[I]f ‘the information of the affidavit clearly shows a long- standing, ongoing pattern of criminal activity, even if fairly long periods of time have lapsed between the information and the issuance of the warrant, the information need not be regarded as stale.’” (quoting United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1056 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, Hoskins v. United States, 469 U.S. 1073 (1984))).
discussed Cited "see" Fujimoto v. Au
Haw. · 2001 · signal: accord · confidence high
To be sure, courts have on occasion denied stockholders’ suits alleging injury, asserting that the stockholders lacked “standing” to bring such an action because the stockholders, “experiencing no direct harm, possess[ ] no primary right to sue.” Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 732 (3d Cir.1970) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); accord EMI Ltd. v. *140 Bennett, 738 F.2d 994, 996-97 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984); Stevens v. Lowder, 643 F.2d 1078, 1080 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed Cited "see" Harris Trust and Savings Bank v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
ERISA provides that: Any person who is a fiduciary with respect to a [covered] plan who breaches any of the responsibilities, obligations, or duties imposed upon fiduciaries by this subchapter shall be ... subject to such other equitable or remedial relief as the court may deem appropriate, including removal of such fiduciary. 29 U.S.C. § 1109 (a); see Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.) (fiduciaries may be removed for “repeated or substantial violation^] of [their] responsibilities”) (quoting Marshall v. Snyder, 572 F.2d 894, 901 (2d Cir.1978)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 10…
cited Cited "see" Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Leroy Holding Co. (In Re Fort Ann Express Inc.)
N.D.N.Y. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Barger v. Hayes County Non-Stock Co-Op (In Re Barger)
8th Cir. BAP · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc., 733 *245 F.2d 509, 515 (8th Cir.) (motions under Rule 60(b) are viewed with disfavor), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Evans v. State of Conn.
D. Conn. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Humphrey (2×)
5th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Kunze, 806 F.2d 594, 598 (5th Cir.1986), see also United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1055 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (holding that in situations which make detailed particularity impossible then “generic language suffices if it particularizes the types of items to be seized”).
discussed Cited "see" Torres v. Costich
W.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (prime rate plus one percent); Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 653 F.2d 1208, 1219-20 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 512 , 70 L.Ed.2d 384 (1981) (Missouri statutory rate); Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report Inc., 613 F.Supp. 634, 648-49 (D.C.D.C.1985) (District of Columbia statutory rate); River Oaks Marine v. Town of Grand Island, No. 89-CV-1016S, 1992 WL 373533 at *7 (W.D.N.Y.
cited Cited "see" Marisol A. by Next Friend Forbes v. Giuliani
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 278 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); Buscemi v. Pepsico, Inc., 736 F.Supp. 1267, 1271-72 (S.D.N.Y.1990).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Castillo-Garcia (2×)
D. Colo. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1055 (5th Cir.) (courts will not invalidate a wiretap order because defense lawyers are able to suggest post factum some investigative technique that might have been used and was not), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); United States v. Johnson, 645 F.2d 865, 867 (10th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 866 , 102 S.Ct. 329 , 70 L.Ed.2d 168 (1981).
cited Cited "see" In Re Bedell
Bankr. W.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lindberg, 735 F.2d 1087 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 566 , 83 L.Ed.2d 507 (1984). 4 .
cited Cited "see" Kollias v. D & G Marine Maintenance
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kollias v. Bay Tankers, 742 F.2d 1441 (2d Cir.) (mem.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984).
cited Cited "see" ca2 1994
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kollias v. Bay Tankers, 742 F.2d 1441 (2d Cir.) (mem.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Frank v. Relin
W.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (using the rate of prime plus one percent); Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 653 F.2d 1208, 1219-20 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 512 , 70 L.Ed.2d 384 (1981) (using the Missouri statutory rate); Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report Inc., 613 F.Supp. 634, 648-49 (D.C.D.C.1985) (using the District of Columbia statutory rate); River Oaks Marine, 1992 WL 373533 at *7 (using the adjusted prime rate); Cefali, 748 F.Supp. at 1025 (using the postjudgment rate).
discussed Cited "see" Gerald G. Roth Logan M. Ammon v. Sawyer-Cleator Lumber Company, Employee Stock Ownership Plan Charles J. Sawyer Clifford E. Sawyer
8th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (asking whether “ ‘trustees, at the time they engaged in the challenged transactions, employed the appropriate methods to investigate the merits of the investment and to structure the investment’ ”) (quoting Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1232 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984)).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Christopher P. Alford (2×)
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1056 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Alford
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1056 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bennett (2×)
D. Colo. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); United States v. Johnson, 645 F.2d 865, 876 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 866 , 102 S.Ct. 329 , 70 L.Ed.2d 168 (1981); United States v. Clements, 588 F.2d 1030 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 243 (1979); United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977); United States v. Smith, 893 F.2d 1573 (9th Cir.1990); Nunez, 877 F.2d at 1472 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. William M. Kelly (2×)
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1056 (5th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
cited Cited "see" U.S. v. Beaumont
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Supplemental Record on Appeal, vol. 2, at 135-48. 9 denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S. Ct. 565 (1984).
cited Cited "see" U.S. v. Kelly
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1056 (5th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S. Ct. 565 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Foy v. Donnelly
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (collecting cases). 31 We think the standards we have adopted in the Bruton context appropriately guide us in the present case.
cited Cited "see" Monfort, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
10th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Local 1814, Int'l Longshoremen Ass'n v. NLRB, 735 F.2d 1384 , 1404 n. 26 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984)
cited Cited "see" Monfort, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
10th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Local 1814, Int'l Longshoremen Ass’n v. NLRB, 735 F.2d 1384 , 1404 n. 26 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Foy v. Donnelly
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (collecting cases).
discussed Cited "see" cadc 1992
D.C. Cir. · 1992 · signal: accord · confidence high
To be sure, courts have on occasion denied stockholders' suits alleging injury, asserting that the stockholders lacked "standing" to bring such an action because the stockholders, "experiencing no direct harm, possess[ ] no primary right to sue." Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 732 (3d Cir.1970) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); accord EMI Ltd. v. Bennett, 738 F.2d 994, 996-97 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984); Stevens v. Lowder, 643 F.2d 1078, 1080 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed Cited "see" Whelan v. Abell
D.C. Cir. · 1992 · signal: accord · confidence high
To be sure, courts have on occasion denied stockholders’ suits alleging injury, asserting that the stockholders lacked “standing” to bring such an action because the stockholders, “experiencing no direct harm, possess[ ] no primary right to sue.” Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 732 (3d Cir.1970) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); accord EMI Ltd. v. Bennett, 738 F.2d 994, 996-97 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984); Stevens v. Lowder, 643 F.2d 1078, 1080 (5th Cir.1981).
cited Cited "see" C-Art, Ltd. v. Hong Kong Islands Line America, S.A.
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally EMI, Ltd. v. Bennett, 738 F.2d 994, 996 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984); Pacific Coast Agric.
cited Cited "see" C-ART, Ltd. v. Hong Kong Islands Line America
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally EMI, Ltd. v. Bennett, 738 F.2d 994, 996 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984); Pacific Coast Agric.
discussed Cited "see" Graham v. Wyeth Laboratories
10th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A. & P. Steel, Inc., 733 F.2d 509 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (a witness' perjury in his deposition and at trial, [like Dr. Geier’s miscalculation of the toxicity level of DTP] constituted newly discovered evidence. .
discussed Cited "see" In Re Peterson
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lindberg, 735 F.2d 1087 , 1089 n. 7 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 566 , 83 L.Ed.2d 507 (1984) 5 Section 47-18-01 has been construed as a limitation and definition of the value of the homestead rather than a definition of the term "homestead." Cullen v. Sullivan, 51 N.D. 384 , 199 N.W. 760 , 761 (1924) 6 The court found that debtor's cohabitation with his girlfriend did not constitute a family unit.
cited Cited "see" Armstrong v. Peterson (In re Peterson)
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lindberg, 735 F.2d 1087 , 1089 n. 7 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 566 , 83 L.Ed.2d 507 (1984). .
cited Cited "see" ca8 1990
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lindberg, 735 F.2d 1087 , 1090 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 566 , 83 L.Ed.2d 507 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Holt (In re Holt)
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lindberg, 735 F.2d 1087, 1090 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 566 , 83 L.Ed.2d 507 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Matter of Tworek
Bankr. D. Neb. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Armstrong v. Lindberg (In re Lindberg), 735 F.2d 1087 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 566 , 83 L.Ed.2d 507 .
cited Cited "see" In Re McKeag
Bankr. D. Minn. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lindberg, 735 F.2d 1087 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 566 , 83 L.Ed.2d 507 (1984). 8 . 645.20.
cited Cited "see" Kaplan v. Primerit Bank (In Re Kaplan)
9th Cir. BAP · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lindberg, 735 F.2d 1087 , 1090 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 566 , 83 L.Ed.2d 507 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Brock v. Group Legal Administrators, Inc. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 278-79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Weems v. Winston (In Re Payne)
Bankr. E.D. Tenn. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lindberg, 735 F.2d 1087 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 566 , 83 L.Ed.2d 507 (1984) (dictum); Winchester v. Watson (In re Winchester), 46 B.R. 492 (9th Cir.BAP 1984); Matter of Ford, 61 B.R. 913 (Bankr.W.D.Wis.1986) (dictum); In re Kao, 52 B.R. 452 (Bankr.D.Ore.1985); In re Wunderlich, 36 B.R. 710 (Bankr.W.D.N.Y.1984); In re Tracy, 28 B.R. 189 (Bankr.D.Me.1983).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Conrad Whitehead, Ii, United States of America v. Hector Quesada (2×)
4th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Beale, 736 F.2d 1289, 1291 (9th Cir.) (en banc) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); 1 W.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Benny Carl Lovell
5th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Beale, 736 F.2d 1289, 1292 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Wesley P. BERNARD, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GULF OIL CORPORATION, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
5th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vuyanich v. Republic Nat’l Bank of Dallas, 723 F.2d 1195, 1200 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 507 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Robert Joseph Blay
6th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1056 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 (1984). 37 Defendant next asserts that the district court committed reversible error in failing to grant him a recess to review the grand jury testimony of the government's witness, Sam Stites.
Hoskins
v.
United States
No. 84-407.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1984.
469 U.S. 1073
Cited by 24 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.