green
Positive treatment
10.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz
(4×)
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476,477 (4th Cir. 1983) cert. denied, sub nom., 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); United States v. Grammatikos, 633 F.2d 1013 (2nd Cir. 1980), or its equivalent, see United States v. Amend, 791 F.2d 1120,1125 (4th Cir. 1986) ("government's 'open file' policy . . . gave [defendant] adequate notice in the same manner as a bill of particulars would have provided") cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 399 , 93 L.Ed.2d 353 (1986); See United State v. DeFries, 129 F.3d 1293,1315 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Pedini v. Bowles
See In re Russell, 726 F.2d 1007, 1011 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steaven Martin BASINGER, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 476 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas C. Hill
(2×)
See United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 476 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); cf. United States v. Batts, 558 F.2d 513, 516 (9th Cir.1977) (upholding the use of illegally obtained evidence to show knowledge and intent without discussing bad faith of the police officers), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 859 , 99 S.Ct. 178 , 58 L.Ed.2d 168 (1978)
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Sherman Steward
See id. at 904 n. 8 (citing cases). 5 .Steward points to our decisions in United States v. Ramirez-Ramirez, 875 F.2d 772 (9th Cir.1989), and United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerald Eugene Stano, Cross-Appellee v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 , 93 S.Ct. 1602, 1608 , 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973); see Tiemens v. United States, 724 F.2d 928, 929 (11th Cir.) (per curiam) ("[A] guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects occurring prior to the time of the plea, including violations of the defendant's rights to a speedy trial and due process."), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McCoy
See United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 476 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jorge Levario, A/K/A George Levario
See United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 475 (9th Cir.) (to constitute a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a) it is only necessary to prove defendant knew he possessed a controlled substance even though he may be mistaken as to the specific type of substance), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Menelao Orlando Estevez, Appeal of Jose Guillermo Haro
(2×)
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476, 477-478 (4th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (indictment notifying defendant of forfeiture of all property and profits from criminal conspiracy and identifying such property in statute’s language complied with Rule 7(c)(2) when bill of particulars described property in detail), certiorari denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Haro
(2×)
See United States v. Raimondo,. 721 F.2d 476 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
The United States v. Hilmer Burdette Sandini, Ernest G. Rockwell, George White Kost, Ronald Paul Urban, Carol Ann Hineman Sandini, Sandra Jean Sandini, Michael Frawley, David Thompson, George Strickler, Sherman John Glunt, Santos Ruiz, Robert Kotula, Eugene Anthony Gesuale, Robert Maker, Vincent Ciraolo, Richard Moody, Edward Mills, Rex Foster, Kenneth Hill, Harry Jessup, Rose Jessup. Appeal of Ronald Paul Urban. The United States v. Hilmer Burdette Sandini A/K/A H.B. Sandini, Sandy, the Old Man George White Kost A/K/A George Kostishach, Maitre D', Richard Reed Ronald Paul Urban. Appeal of Ronald Paul Urban
(2×)
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984). 41 In other settings, statutes permitting enhanced penalties have established the prosecution's burden of proof as a preponderance of the evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sandini
(2×)
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ramaria Familienstiftung v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476, 477 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, Bello v. United States, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bassett
(2×)
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476, 478 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, Bello v. United States, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); United States v. Long, 654 F.2d 911, 915-17 (3d Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Emerson Bonnette, Jr.
(2×)
See Watters v. Hubbard, 725 F.2d 381 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984) (failure to- establish cause because federal circuit court decisions had recognized the fifth amendment implications inherent in admissions to examining psychiatrists); cf. Reddick v. Callahan, 587 F.Supp. 880 (D.Mass.1984) (lack of cause for burden of proof claim because petitioner could have objected at trial based on Winship , decided two months before his trial, and could thereafter have argued the. issue on appeal).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chandra McDonald Danny Ray Taylor
See United States v. Lowery, 726 F.2d 474, 476 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 73 (1984); United States v. Glenn, 667 F.2d 1269, 1274 (9th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Mark I. Tebha, Cross-Appellee
Fed.E.Evid. 404(b); see United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 475-76 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Standard Drywall Corp.
(2×)
Accord United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476, 477 (4th Cir.1983) (indictment need not describe each item subject to forfeiture), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d at 1347 (“Bare-bones pleading suffices so long as it puts the defendant on notice that the government seeks forfeiture and identifies the assets subject to forfeiture with sufficient specificity to permit the defendant to marshal evidence in their defense.”); United States v. Boffa, 688 F.2d 919, 939 (3d Cir. 1982) (allegation that all of defendants’ interest in …
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. James Richard Bello, United States of America v. James Richard Bello
(4×)
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476, 477 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rogers
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476, 478 (4th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 105 S.Ct. *1347 133, 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); United States v. Long, 654 F.2d at 917 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Twohig v. Blackmer
The Tenth Circuit concluded that such statements made “while [the] criminal trial was pending [were] not compatible with the concept of a fair trial.” Id. (emphasis added); see also In re Russell, 726 F.2d 1007, 1010 (4th Cir.) (upholding trial court order prohibiting potential witnesses in a criminal case from discussing their proposed testimony with members of the media because of “tremendous publicity[,] the potentially inflammatory and highly prejudicial statements ..., and the relative ineffectiveness of the considered alternatives” (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cutler
Dow Jones, 842 F.2d at 610 (citations omitted); see also In re Russell, 726 F.2d 1007, 1010 (4th Cir.) (in upholding order restraining witnesses from discussing case with media, Court held that “the evidence considered by [the District Court judge] adequately supported his determination that there was a reasonable likelihood that the defendants would be denied a fair trial without proscribing certain of petitioners’ extrajudicial statements”), cer t. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); Hirschkop v. Snead, 594 F.2d 356, 370 (4th Cir.1979) (upholding virtually iden…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of ALJ
(2×)
Compare, for example, United States v. Lowery, 726 F.2d 474 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 73 (1984); Brisco v. United States, 368 F.2d 214 (3rd Cir.1966); and Cunningham v. United States, 256 F.2d 467 (5th Cir.1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carlos Varela
(2×)
Although intrasovereign involvement may be a factor when assessing the motivation of law enforcement officials, the fact of intrasovereign involvement does not provide, in and of itself, "a reliable predictor of deterrence." Tirado, 689 F.2d at 313 ; see also United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 476 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); 4 LaFave, supra, § 11.6(c), at 501-02.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Butler
(2×)
“Congress did not intend that an individual be punished under both § 846 (conspiracy) and § 848 (continuing criminal enterprise).” United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 967 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988); See also United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGee v. State
See also United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); United States v. Finucan, 708 F.2d 838 (1st Cir.1983); United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654 (5th Cir), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); People v. Drain, 73 N.Y.2d 107 , 538 N.Y.S.2d 500 , 535 N.E.2d 630 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People in Interest of MC
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lowery, 726 F.2d 474 (9th Cir.1983) (no equal protection violation when defendant received longer sentence under Youth Corrections Act than defendant could have received as adult), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 73 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lowell Brown
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 475 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984) (“[Defendant] was charged with importing and possessing a controlled substance, heroin, and the evidence established ... that he did so.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Helen Grenier Lyon, Etc. v. The Ranger III and Gerald J. Costa, Helen Grenier Lyon, Etc. v. The Ranger III and Gerald J. Costa
In such a case, each defendant is liable not only for his own acts but also for the acts of others with whom he acts in concert, see 3 Harper, James & Gray § 10.1 (“concert of action" makes it “proper to treat the conduct of each as the conduct of the others as well”); Restatement (2d) § 876 & comment a (same); Prosser & Keeton § 46 (same); Speiser, Krause & Gans § 3:4 (similar); see, e.g., Thompson v. Johnson, 180 F.2d 431 (5th Cir.1950) (where group aided assault and battery, all liable under “concerted action” or non-pecuniary “common enterprise” theories); Hall, 345 F.Sup…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Simon
See Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 563-64 , 96 S.Ct. 2791, 2804-05 , 49 L.Ed.2d 683 (1976); Branzburg, 408 U.S. at 685 , 92 S.Ct. at 2658 ; see also In re Russell, 726 F.2d 1007, 1009-11 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); In re Application of National *791 Broadcasting Company, Inc., 635 F.2d 945, 951 (2d Cir.1980); United States v. Tijerina, 412 F.2d 661, 666-67 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 478 , 24 L.Ed.2d 452 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pacific Hide & Fur Depot, Inc., United States of America v. William Knick
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 474-75 (9th Cir.) (importation and possession of heroin with intent to distribute), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); United States v. Suttiswad, 696 F.2d 645, 649-52 (9th Cir.1982) (same); United States v. Nicholson, 677 F.2d 706, 710-11 (9th Cir.1982) (conspiracy to import and possess marijuana with intent to distribute); United States v. Erwin, 625 F.2d 838, 841 (9th Cir.1980) (importation of heroin).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Watters
v.
Hubbard, Superintendent, Lima State Hospital
v.
Hubbard, Superintendent, Lima State Hospital
No. 83-6524.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.