Spencer v. South Carolina Tax Comm'n, 471 U.S. 82 (1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Spencer v. South Carolina Tax Comm'n, 471 U.S. 82 (1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Greenwich Township v. Murtagh (pacommwct, 1992-01-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see, e.g." Greenwich Township v. Murtagh (4×)
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Spencer v. South Carolina Tax Commission, 281 S.C. 492 , 316 S.E.2d 386 (1984), aff'd mem., 471 U.S. 82 , 105 S.Ct. 1859 , 85 L.Ed.2d 62 (1985); Johnson v. Gaston County, 71 N.C.App. 707 , 323 S.E.2d 381 , appeal denied, 313 N.C. 508 , 329 S.E.2d 392 (1985); Zizka v. Water Pollution Control Authority, 195 Conn. 682 , 490 A.2d 509 (1985); Davis v. City of Elkhorn, 132 Wis.2d 394 , 393 N.W.2d 95 (1986); Nutbrown v. Munn, 311 Or. 328 , 811 P.2d 131 (1990); Hogan v. Musolf, 163 Wis.2d I, 471 N.W.2d 216 (1991); L.L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Colonial Pipeline Company, and Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Marcus E. Collins, Sr. (2×)
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland, 481 U.S. 221 , 234 n. 7, 107 S.Ct. 1722 , 1730 n. 7, 95 L.Ed.2d 209 (1987); see also Spencer v. South Carolina Tax Comm’n, 281 S.C. 492 , 316 S.E.2d 386 , aff'd by an equally divided Court, 471 U.S. 82 , 105 S.Ct. 1859 , 85 L.Ed.2d 62 (1984). 15 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland (2×)
SCOTUS · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Spencer v. South Carolina Tax Comm’n, 281 S. C. 492, 316 S. E. 2d 386 , aff’d by an equally divided Court, 471 U. S. 82 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SPENCER ET UX.
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COMMISSION ET AL.
84-249.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1985.
471 U.S. 82
Per Curiam.
Published
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Henry L. Parr, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Eric B. Amstutz and Frank S. Holleman III.

Ray N. Stevens, Senior Assistant Attorney General of South Carolina, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General, and Joe L. Allen, Jr., Chief Deputy Attorney General.[*]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

[*] Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the State of Alaska et al. by Francis X. Bellotti, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Thomas R. Kiley, First Assistant Attorney General, Judith S. Yogman, Assistant Attorney General, Norman Gorsuch, Attorney General of Alaska, Steve Clark, Attorney General of Arkansas, Duane Woodard, Attorney General of Colorado, Jim Jones, Attorney General of Idaho, Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General of Iowa, David L. Armstrong, Attorney General of Kentucky, Alex W. Rose, Assistant Attorney General, Stephan H. Sachs, Attorney General of Maryland, Hubert H. Humphrey III, Attorney General of Minnesota, Brian McKay, Attorney General of Nevada, Peter W. Mosseau, Acting Attorney General of New Hampshire, Robert O. Wefald, Attorney General of North Dakota, Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., Attorney General of Ohio, LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Mark V. Meierhenry, Attorney General of South Dakota; and for the Council of State Governments et al. by Joyce Holmes Benjamin.