green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
16.0 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases ·
…absent such evidence , we are left ... with mere speculation and conjecture.
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Chester R. Robinson and Wife, Frances Earline Robinson, and Roy K. Ewart and David B. Black v. The National Cash Register Company
But see Nelson v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., 750 F.2d 1234, 1238 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1116 , 105 S.Ct. 2358 , 86 L.Ed.2d 259 (1985); Suslick, 741 F.2d at 1001 (continuing to analyze rule 11 violations under a bad faith standard). 15 An attorney’s good faith is no longer enough to protect him from rule 11 sanctions.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. General Telephone Company Of Northwest
(2×)
absent such evidence , we are left ... with mere speculation and conjecture.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. General Telephone Co. of Northwest, Inc.
(2×)
absent such evidence , we are left ... with mere speculation and conjecture.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Zeigler Coal Co. v. Jones
Sec. 727.203(b)(3). 1 We held that subsection (b)(3) "does not permit the award of benefits for partial disability; it merely grants an employer the chance to prove that a miner's disability did not arise, in whole or in part, from his coal mine employment." Id. at 1120.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Adeline M. Bruno v. W.B. Saunders Company and Cbs Educational and Professional Publishing, a Division of Cbs, Inc.
(5×)
also: Cited "see"
Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1274 (D.C.Cir.1984) (citing Hazelwood, 433 U.S. at 308 n. 13, 97 S.Ct. at 2742 n. 13) (citation omitted), 5 cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 5.Ct. 2357, 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985); see Simpson v. Midland-Boss Corp., 823 F.2d 937 , 943-44 (6th Cir.1987) (ADEA); Palmer v. Shultz, 815 F.2d 84 , 91 & n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1987) (Title VII); Valentino v. United States Postal Serv., 674 F.2d 56, 69 (D.C.Cir.1982) (same); Grano v. Department of Dev., 637 F.2d 1073 , 1078-79 (6th Cir.1980) (same). 6 In its charge to the jury in this case, the district court, after discussing expert …
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hurlen Lewis v. Blue Diamond Coal Co. And Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
Where, however, pneumoconiosis is a contributing cause to a miner's total disability, he is conclusively entitled to benefits. 5 Id. at 1120.
discussed
Cited "see"
Authority of the United States to Enter Settlements Limiting the Future Exercise of Executive Branch Discretion
See United States v. Board of Educ., 744 F.2d 1300, 1301 (7th Cir. 1984) (each party to the agreement assumed obligation to “ make every good faith effort” to fund desegregation plan), cert, denied, 471 U.S. 1116 (1985); Patrick Memo at 4.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hrubec v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
See Nelson v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., 750 F.2d 1234, 1238 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1116 , 105 S.Ct. 2358 , 86 L.Ed.2d 259 (1985) (a pleading or motion is warranted by existing law if it addresses a question of first impression); Brown Mackie College v. Graham, 1991 WL 278286 1991 U.S. Dist.
cited
Cited "see"
Krantz v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Intern.
See Nelson v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., 750 F.2d 1234, 1237 (4th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1116 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian Eugene Sawyers, United States of America v. Wilbert Odell Richardson, United States of America v. Brian Eugene Sawyers
(2×)
See United States v. Massa, 740 F.2d 629, 647 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1992
(2×)
Our review of the jury's determination of this question is exceedingly limited: 13 If the record contains evidence from which the jury could find one overall agreement to commit an illegal act, the evidence establishes a single conspiracy. 14 United States v. Regan, 940 F.2d 1134, 1135 (8th Cir.1991); see United States v. Massa, 740 F.2d 629, 636-37 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Askew
(2×)
United States v. Regan, 940 F.2d 1134, 1135 (8th Cir.1991); see United States v. Massa, 740 F.2d 629, 636-37 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
examined
Cited "see"
John Edmond v. United States Postal Service General Counsel
(4×)
See Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1285 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fallis v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
(2×)
See Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1274 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca10 1991
(2×)
See Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1274 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Company
(2×)
The district court found that none of these studies, taken alone, was statistically significant at the five percent level. 720 F.Supp. at 204 ; see id. at 201 n. 6 (citing Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1282 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985), as authority for requiring statistical significance at five percent level). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1988
(2×)
See United States v. Massa, 740 F.2d 629, 636 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985); United States v. Brewer, 630 F.2d 795, 799-800 (10th Cir.1980).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Thaddeus Adonis Long, United States of America v. Edward Larry Jackson
(4×)
See United States v. Massa, 740 F.2d 629, 644 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baker
(2×)
See United States v. Massa, 740 F.2d 629, 636 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985); United States v. Brewer, 630 F.2d 795, 799-800 (10th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lawton Frazier v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
(2×)
See Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1282-83 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paris
(2×)
See United States v. Massa, 740 F.2d 629, 645 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, and Cross-Appellant v. Hugh J. Shannon A/K/A Hughey J. Shannon, A/K/A Hugh J. Shannon, and Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See United States v. Massa, 740 F.2d 629, 645 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ottaviani v. State University of New York at New Paltz
(2×)
See Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1278 (D.C.Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles E. Wagner v. Reese H. Taylor, Jr., Chairman, Interstate Commerce Commission
(2×)
See Segar v. Civiletti, 508 F.Supp. 690, 705-708, 714 (D.D.C.1981), aff'd in part and vacated in part, 238 U.S.App.D.C. 103 , 738 F.2d 1249 (1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eldredge v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Joint Apprenticeship & Training Committee
(2×)
See Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1283 (D.C.Cir.1984) (holding that the .05 level of significance is "certainly sufficient to support an inference of discrimination"), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1987
(2×)
See Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1283 (D.C.Cir.1984) (holding that the .05 level of significance is "certainly sufficient to support an inference of discrimination"), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985). 9 Eldredge argues that the JATC's practice of permitting indentured apprentices to remain in the program if they become unemployed belies the claim that the first-job requirement is a business necessity 10 While ordinarily we would require plaintiffs to show that the alternate method would be both effective and nondiscriminatory, we do not think that such pro…
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1987
(2×)
Teamsters, 431 U.S. at 361, 371-72 , 97 S.Ct. at 1872-73 ; see Hameed v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, 637 F.2d 506 , 519 (8th Cir.1980). 21 A court, however, retains equitable discretion to fashion an appropriate remedy when, for example, the number of qualified class members exceeds the number of openings lost to the class through discrimination and identification of the individuals entitled to relief would "drag the court into 'a quagmire of hypothetical judgments' " and result in "mere guesswork." Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1289-90 (D.C.Cir.1984) …
examined
Cited "see"
Larkin Pennington v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
(3×)
See Ramey, 755 F.2d at 487-88 (interim presumption rebutted by medical reports indicating merely that the claimant "should curtail his exposure to dust"). 4 Substantial evidence supports the ALJ's conclusion that the medical evidence as a whole was sufficient to rebut the interim presumption of total disability due to pneumoconiosis. 2 Accordingly, the decision of the Benefits Review Board is hereby AFFIRMED. 1 " 'B-readers' have the greatest expertise and training for evaluating x-rays." Gibas v. Saginaw Mining Co., 748 F.2d 1112 , 1114 n. 3 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1116 , 105 S…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kent Melvin Vesterso, Warren August Anderson, Davis Leas
(2×)
See United States v. Massa, 740 F.2d 629, 642-43 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985). 11 The trial court’s finding that the appellants knowingly damaged federal property is not clearly erroneous.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Bowlin v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
See Gibas v. Saginaw Mining Co., 748 F.2d 1112 , 1114 n.3 (6th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1116 (1985). 6 The presumption may be invoked under subsection (a)(2) if qualifying ventilatory studies establish the presence of chronic respiratory or pulmonary disease.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel R. Zimmerman, A/K/A Bishop Zimmerman, A/K/A the Great Z
(2×)
See United States v. Massa, 740 F.2d 629, 636 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joy Rogers Thomas v. Metroflight, Inc., D/B/A Metro Airlines, Inc.
(2×)
In making a prima facie case in a disparate impact suit, however, the plaintiff must not merely prove circumstances raising an inference of discriminatory impact; he must prove the discriminatory impact at issue.” Johnson v. Uncle Ben’s, Inc., 657 F.2d 750 , 753 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982) (emphasis added); accord Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1266-68 , 1270 n. 17 (D.C.Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985); Moore v. Hughes Helicopters, Inc., 708 F.2d 475, 481-82 (9th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Alison Palmer v. George P. Shultz, as Secretary of State. Marguerite Cooper v. George P. Shultz, as Secretary of State
See id. at 290-92.
examined
Cited "see"
Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co.
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1270-72 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
examined
Cited "see"
Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Company
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1270-72 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Latinos Unidos De Chelsea en Accion (Lucha) v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
(2×)
See Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1270-72 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985). 23 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Duane Wendall Larson
(2×)
See United States v. Massa, 740 F.2d 629, 645 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rossini v. Ogilvy & Mather, Inc.
(2×)
See Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985) and cases cited therein.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Patricia L. Killip v. Office of Personnel Management
(3×)
See Lyng v. Payne, 476 U.S. 926, 937 , 106 S.Ct. 2333, 2340 , 90 L.Ed.2d 921 (1986); Sealed Air Corp. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 645 F.2d 976, 993 (CCPA 1981) ("Any authority delegated or granted to an administrative agency is necessarily limited to the terms of the delegating statute."); see also Gibas v. Saginaw Mining Co., 748 F.2d 1112, 1117 (6th Cir.1984) (administrative agencies are vested only with the authority given to them by Congress), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1116 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985); Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Felix Waisome v. The Port Authority Of New York And New Jersey
(2×)
See, e.g., Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1283-84 (D.C.Cir.1984) (where failure to show significance of disparity in one set of promotions is due to small sample size, evidence of other discrimination, including other promotion decisions, may suffice to show disparate impact), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985); Boston Chapter, N.A.A.C.P., Inc. v. Beecher, 504 F.2d 1017, 1019-21 (1st Cir.1974) (other evidence of discrimination may supplement statistical evidence where small sample size precludes showing of significant disparity), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 9…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waisome v. Port Authority of New York
(2×)
See, e.g., Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1283-84 (D.C.Cir.1984) (where failure to show significance of disparity in one set of promotions is due to small sample size, evidence of other discrimination, including other promotion decisions, may suffice to show disparate impact), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985); Boston Chapter, N.A.A.C.P., Inc. v. Beecher, 504 F.2d 1017, 1019-21 (1st Cir.1974) (other evidence of discrimination may supplement statistical evidence where small sample size precludes showing of significant disparity), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Keen v. Ruddy
See, e.g., Nelson v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., 750 F.2d 1234, 1238 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1116 , 105 S.Ct. 2358 , 86 L.Ed.2d 259 (1985).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Consolidation Coal Co.
(3×)
"Substantial evidence is 'such evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.' " Milliken, 866 F.2d at 202 (quoting Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971); accord Crisp, 866 F.2d at 184 . 6 An examination of the administrative record herein indicates that there was substantial evidence to support the ALJ's conclusion that Consolidation Coal had demonstrated, by the weight of the testimony and documentary evidence, that decedent's disability and death "did not arise in whole or in part out of coal mine employment."…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Milliken
(3×)
“The court of appeals scrutinizes Board decisions for errors of law and for adherence to the statutory standard governing the Board’s review of the administrative law judge’s factual determinations.” Director, OWCP v. Rowe, 710 F.2d 251, 254 (6th Cir.1983) (quoting Bumble Bee Seafoods v. Director, OWCP, 629 F.2d 1327 , 1329 (9th Cir.1980)); see also Gibas v. Saginaw Mining Co., 748 F.2d 1112, 116 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1116 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Youghiogheny and Ohio Coal Company v. Milliken
(3×)
"The court of appeals scrutinizes Board decisions for errors of law and for adherence to the statutory standard governing the Board's review of the administrative law judge's factual determinations." Director, OWCP v. Rowe, 710 F.2d 251, 254 (6th Cir.1983) (quoting Bumble Bee Seafoods v. Director, OWCP, 629 F.2d 1327 , 1329 (9th Cir.1980)); see also Gibas v. Saginaw Mining Co., 748 F.2d 1112, 1116 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1116 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walker v. Brown Badgett, Inc.
See also Gibas v. Saginaw Mining Co., 748 F.2d 1112 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1116 (1985). 6 On appeal, Walker first contends that the ALJ and the Board erred in finding that the opinion of Dr. Gallo is not contrary and hostile to the Act.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca10 1988
(2×)
Moreover, the legitimacy of the articulated reason for the employment decision is subject to particularly close scrutiny where the evaluation is subjective and the evaluators themselves are not members of the protected minority." 34 Id. at 837 (citations omitted); see also Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1290 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985); Burrus v. United Tel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scanio
(2×)
See also United States v. Massa, 740 F.2d 629, 645 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied sub nom Skinner v. United States, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 [ 86 L.Ed.2d 258 ] (1985); United States v. Sanchez Vazquez, 585 F.Supp. 990, 993 (N.D.Ga.1984); United States v. Konefal, 566 F.Supp. 698 (N.D.N.Y.1983) (prosecution for structuring upheld under title 31).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pitre v. Western Electric Co.
(2×)
Moreover, the legitimacy of the articulated reason for the employment decision is subject to particularly close scrutiny where the evaluation is subjective and the evaluators themselves are not members of the protected minority.” Id. at 837 (citations omitted); see also Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1290 (D.C.Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985); Burrus v. United Tel.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartman v. Wick
(4×)
Id. at 372 , 97 S.Ct. at 1873 ; compare Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1290 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1115 , 105 S.Ct. 2357 , 86 L.Ed.2d 258 (1985) (hearings not required “when discrimination has so percolated through an employment system that any attempt to reconstruct individual employment histories would drag the court into ‘a quagmire of hypothetical judgments’ ”).
Saginaw Mining Co.
v.
Gibas
v.
Gibas
No. 84-1344.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 20, 1985.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (4)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.