green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1993 ·
…cjomprehensiveness alone is not enough to demonstrate a federal intent to occupy the entire field.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hawaiian Navigable Waters Preservation Society v. Hawaii
(2×)
cjomprehensiveness alone is not enough to demonstrate a federal intent to occupy the entire field.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Dent, Also Known as William Brown, and Ivy T. Tucker
(2×)
See United States v. Pizarro, 717 F.2d 336, 348 (7th Cir.1983), aff'd on remand, 756 F.2d 579 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1139 , 105 S.Ct. 2686 , 86 L.Ed.2d 703 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass'n v. Aubry
(2×)
See Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Hammond, 726 F.2d 483, 496 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1140 , 105 S.Ct. 2686 , 86 L.Ed.2d 703 (1985) (state law should be preempted only to the extent necessary to protect the achievement of the aims of the federal act in question); Wasyl, Inc. v. First Boston Corp., Inc., 813 F.2d 1579, 1582 (9th Cir.1987) (same); Bergen v. F/V St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pacific Merchant Shipping Association American Institute of Merchant Shipping Offshore Marine Service Association Western Oil and Gas Association Clean Seas v. Lloyd W. Aubry, Jr., Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, Department of Industrial Relations, State of California v. Tidewater Marine Service, Inc. Western Boat Operators, Inc., Plaintiff/intervenors-Appellees
(2×)
See Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Hammond, 726 F.2d 483, 496 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1140 , 105 S.Ct. 2686 , 86 L.Ed.2d 703 (1985) (state law should be preempted only to the extent necessary to protect the achievement of the aims of the federal act in question); Wasyl, Inc. v. First Boston Corp., Inc., 813 F.2d 1579, 1582 (9th Cir.1987) (same); Bergen v. F/V St.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Wheeler
(2×)
See United States v. Pizarro, 756 F.2d 579 (7th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 2686 , 86 L.Ed.2d 703 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Toy Manufacturers of America, Inc. v. Blumenthal
(2×)
As Chief Justice Rehnquist has emphasized: “Unless the requisite pre-emptive intent is abundantly clear, we should hesitate to invalidate state or local legislation for the added reason that ‘the state is powerless to remove the ill effects of our decision, while the national government, which has the ultimate power, remains free to remove the burden.’ ” City of Burbank Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc., 411 U.S. 624, 643 , 93 S.Ct. 1854, 1864 , 36 L.Ed.2d 547 (1973) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting) (quoting Penn Dairies, Inc. v. Milk Control Comm’n, 318 U.S. 261, 275 , 63 S.Ct. 617, 624 , 87 L…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
(2×)
See e.g., Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Hammond, 726 F.2d 483, 489 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1140 , 105 S.Ct. 2686 , 86 L.Ed.2d 703 (1985); District of Columbia v. Schramm, 631 F.2d 854, 960 (D.C.Cir.1980) (Congress has “carefully constructed a legislative scheme that imposes[s] major responsibility for control of water pollution on the States.”); Committee for Consideration of Jones Falls Sewage Sys. v. Train, 539 F.2d 1006 , 1009 (4th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Environmental Encapsulating Corp. v. City of New York
See also Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Hammond, 726 F.2d 483 , 488 & n. 6 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1140 , 105 S.Ct. 2686 , 66 L.Ed.2d 703 (1985); Chrysler Corporation v. Tofany, 419 F.2d 499 , 511 (2d Cir.1969) (federal safety standard on motor vehicle lighting does not preempt state regulation of auxiliary headlamps on motor, vehicles); Pierce, Regulation, Dregulation, Federalism, and Administrative Law: Agency Power to Preempt State Regulation, 46 U.Pitt.L.Rev. 607, 626 (1985) (“The few environmental cases decided so far indicate that the courts will give at least as much deference…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goudreau v. Standard Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
Compare Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Hammond, 726 F.2d 483, 497 (9th Cir.1984) (where both federal and state enactment reflect a policy choice favoring the same goal, the court should be reluctant to infer preemption), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2684 , 86 L.Ed.2d 703 (1985). 8 Ill Finally, we briefly consider appellants’ contention that § 18 of RESPA, 12 U.S.C. § 2616 , blocks the preemptive effect of 12 C.F.R. § 545.8-3 (b) (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Derin Pollard
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Pizarro, 756 F.2d 579 (7th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2686 , 86 L.Ed.2d 703 ; United States v. Panza, 750 F.2d 1141 (2d Cir.1984); United States v. Ivey, 550 F.2d 243 (5th Cir.1977), certiorari denied sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pizarro
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-6690.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 3, 1985.
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.