green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.1 score
“handley ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Lenwood Lewis White, United States of America v. Terry Joe Tucker, United States of America v. William Johnny Mason, Roger David Handley, David Lee Kelso, and Ray Winford Steele, United States of America v. William David Riccio, United States of America v. Ricky Lynn Creekmore, United States of America v. David Lee Kelso
handley ii
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc. v. Department of Public Utility Control
See State v. Dupree, 196 Conn. 655, 660 , 495 A.2d 691 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 951 , 106 S. Ct. 318 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Harrell
The state then contends that because a specific intent is not required to violate the felony murder and arson murder statutes; see State v. Dupree, 196 Conn. 655, 663 , 495 A.2d 691 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 951 , 106 S. Ct. 318 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mobley
Caldor’s, Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc., [ 177 Conn. 304, 314-15 , 417 A.2d 343 (1979)]. [T]he judiciary may not sit as a super-legislature to judge the wisdom or desirability of legislative policy determinations made in areas that neither affect fundamental rights nor proceed along suspect lines ... it is only the invidious discrimination, the wholly arbitrary act, which cannot stand consistently with the Fourteenth Amendment.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Blue Sky Bar, Inc. v. Stratford, 203 Conn. 14, 26-27 (1987); see State v. Dupree, 196 Conn. 655, 664 , 495 A.2d 691 , cert. denied…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Grullon
Further, “[p]enal statutes are to be construed strictly . . . and not extended by implication to create liability that the legislature did not purport to create.” State v. Hufford, 205 Conn. 386, 392 , 533 A.2d 866 (1987); see State v. Dupree, 196 Conn. 655, 660 , 495 A.2d 691 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 951 , 106 S. Ct. 318 , 88 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hernandez
See State v. Dupree, 196 Conn. 655, 663 , 495 A.2d 691 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 951 , 106 S. Ct. 318 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connecticut v. Dyson
We have, however, previously stated that “a scienter requirement may mitigate a law’s vagueness, especially with respect to the adequacy of notice to the [defendant] that his conduct is proscribed.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Indrisano, supra, 228 Conn. 803 ; see also State v. Dupree, 196 Conn. 655, 663 , 495 A.2d 691 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 951 , 106 S. Ct. 318 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lipford
See also United States v. Handley, *468 763 F. 2d 1401 , 1404 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 88 L.Ed. 2d 301 , 106 S.Ct. 243 (1985) (“A defendant has standing to object on the ground of the fifth amendment self-incrimination privilege to the admission only of his own statements.”); United States v. Shaffner, 524 F. 2d 1021, 1022 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 920 , 47 L.Ed. 2d 327 , 96 S.Ct. 1125 (1976) (defendant had no standing to object to introduction of co-defendant’s confession on the grounds that it was not voluntarily given).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McDonald
v.
Tennessee
v.
Tennessee
No. 85-5412.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 4, 1985.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2)
Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.