green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1991 ·
…he repetition/evasion exception does not require a repetition of the exact law or behavior. the focus is on whether the same issues, arising from a repetition of a similar law or action, are likely to recur.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 44 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Recruit U.S.A., Inc.
he repetition/evasion exception does not require a repetition of the exact law or behavior. the focus is on whether the same issues, arising from a repetition of a similar law or action, are likely to recur.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
56 Fair empl.prac.cas. 721, 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,888 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Recruit U.S.A., Inc. Interplace/transworld Recruit, Inc.
he repetition/evasion exception does not require a repetition of the exact law or behavior. the focus is on whether the same issues, arising from a repetition of a similar law or action, are likely to recur.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Electrodyne Systems Corporation
See United States v. de le Puente, 755 F.2d 313, 315 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 456 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Calhoun County Texas v. United States
See California v. Yuba Goldfields, Inc., 752 F.2d 393, 396 (9th Cir.) (holding that recording of deed naming United States as grantee constituted actual notice of United States interest in property for QTA limitations purposes), cert, denied sub nom., California State Lands Comm’n v. United States, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 526 , 88 L.Ed.2d 458 (1985); Lee v. United States, 629 F.Supp. 721 (D.Alaska 1985) (holding' that QTA limitations period began to run upon publication of notice of federal claims in Federal Register).
discussed
Cited "see"
Agro Air Assoc. v. Houston Casualty
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1447-48 (11th Cir.) ("[A] new trial should be ordered only where the verdict is so excessive as to shock the conscience of the court."), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); Hatfield v. Anthony Forest Prods.
discussed
Cited "see"
AGRO AIR ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1447-48 (11th Cir.) ("[A] new trial should be ordered only where the verdict is so excessive as to shock the conscience of the court.”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); Hatfield v. Anthony Forest Prods.
cited
Cited "see"
Gray v. Russell Corp.
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, Inc., 758 F.2d 1435, 1443 (11th Cir.), cert. den'd, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
LaFleur v. Wallace State Community College
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richardson v. Leeds Police Department
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448 (11th Cir.) (the decision of whether reinstatement should be ordered is within the sound discretion of the district court), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); Carmichael v. Birmingham Saw Works, 738 F.2d 1126, 1136 (11th Cir.1984) (injunction ordering employer to refrain from discriminatory practices not justified where the plaintiff is not reinstated).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richardson v. Leeds Police Dept.
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc. , 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448 (11th Cir.) (the 9 In each case, the applicant sought to return to the same position he had vacated, a similar length of time elapsed between the officer's departure and his request to be rehired and the mayor made the final decision. 10 We reject without discussion Richardson's assertion that the jury's finding was inconsistent with its deadlock on the issue of whether the City's refusal to rehire him was motivated by a discriminatory purpose. 15 decision of whether reinstatement should be ordered is within the sound discretion of…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Yvonne Tunstall, United States of America v. Jerretta Hatcher
See United States v. Smith Grading & Paving, Inc., 760 F.2d 527, 532 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 (1985). 12 Also, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hatcher's motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gates
See United States v. Garwood, 20 MJ 148, 154 (CMA), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 456 (1985); see also Wayte v. United States, 470 U.S. 598 , 105 S.Ct. 1524 , 84 L.Ed.2d 547 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Lloyd Patterson
See United States v. Smith Grading & Paving, Inc., 760 F.2d 527, 530-31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); see also United States v. Abel, 469 U.S. 45, 56 , 105 S.Ct. 465, 471 , 83 L.Ed.2d 450 (1984) (evidence impermissible under Rule 608(b) was still properly admissible to show bias); United States v. Martinez, 962 F.2d 1161, 1164-65 (5th Cir.1992) (same); Fed.R.Evid. 105.
cited
Cited "see"
Prince v. United Parcel Service
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1442 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trandes Corporation v. Guy F. Atkinson Company, and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
See Estate of Whitt v. Commissioner, 751 F.2d 1548, 1558 (11th Cir.) (court should affirm on alternative ground only in the absence of prejudice), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 523 , 88 L.Ed.2d 456 (1985). 8 .This case presents an unusual set of facts.
cited
Cited "see"
Neal v. Toyota Motor Corp.
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shifflett
See United States v. Smith Grading & Paving, Inc., 760 F.2d 527, 532 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Peter Russell
See United States v. Smith Grading & Paving, Inc., 760 F.2d 527, 532 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Loving
See United States v. Garwood, 20 M.J. 148, 152 (C.M.A.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 456 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Deloach, Cross-Appellant v. Delchamps, Inc., Cross-Appellee. Richard Deloach v. Delchamps, Inc.
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448-49 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lowe v. Commack Union Free School District
Maxfield, 766 F.2d at 792 ; see Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1442 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); McCorstin, 621 F.2d at 753-54 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lowe v. Commack Union Free School District
Maxfield, 766 F.2d at 792; see Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1442 (11th Cir.), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); McCorstin, 621 F.2d at 753-54 .
cited
Cited "see"
Evans v. Evans
See Ex parte Burlington Northern R.R. , 470 So.2d 1094 , 1095 (Ala. 1985), cert. denied , 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Tolliver v. Leach
See McSurely v. McClellan, 753 F.2d 88, 98 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jobson
See United States v. Garwood, 16 M.J. 863, 868 (N.M.C.M.R. 1983) aff’d. 20 M.J. 148 (C.M.A.), cert. den. 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 456 (1985) and Annot., 5 A.L.R.Fed. 948 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
George Lamborn, Henry Maringer, and Lamar Commodities, a Partnership v. Thomas H. Dittmer and Dittmer International, Inc.
See United States v. Smith Grading & Paving, Inc., 760 F.2d 527, 531 (4th Cir.) (“Rule 608(b) should not be read so broadly as to disallow the presentation of extrinsic evidence that is probative of a material issue in a case.”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Dorothy D. STANFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANSWERING SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellant
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indust., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448-49 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 1005 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bradley
See United States v. Garwood, 20 M.J. 148, 154 (C.M.A.) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 456 (1985). 1 II The appellant was charged in a single specification with housebreaking into both Buildings 1086 and 1029 at Beale Air Force Base. 2 At trial, he pleaded not guilty vis-avis Building 1029 and guilty to the lesser included offense of unlawful entry as to Building 1086.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gert Albertus Theron
See United States v. de le Puente, 755 F.2d 313, 315 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 456 (1985) (no realistic likelihood defendant thought he could withdraw his plea); United States v. Otte, 729 F.2d 1207, 1208 (9th Cir.1984) (no allegation defendant mistaken as to right to withdraw plea).
cited
Cited "see"
Von Stein v. Brescher
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, 758 F.2d 1435 , 1447-48 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mansion House Center Redevelopment Co.
Accord McSurely v. McClellan, 697 F.2d 309, 317 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wayne Chastain v. Don Sundquist
(2×)
See McSurely v. McClellan, 753 F.2d 88, 99-102 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); Walker v. Jones, 733 F.2d 923, 932-33 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S.Ct. 512 , 83 L.Ed.2d 402 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
The United States v. Emmett Earl Fulford, Anthony J. Sanner. Appeal of Emmett Earl Fulford
See United States v. De Le Puente, 755 F.2d 313, 314 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 456 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bauer v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
Finally, there is no indication that any facts have been disclosed to those persons with whom the plaintiff has “a special relationship” thereby rendering the disclosure “just as devastating as disclosure to many.” Miller v. Motorola, Inc., 202 Ill.App.3d 976 , 148 Ill.Dec. 303 , 560 N.E.2d 900, 903 (1990); see also McSurely v. McClellan, 753 F.2d 88, 112 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); Beaumont v. Brown, 401 Mich. 80 , 257 N.W.2d 522, 531 (1977) overruled in part on other grounds by Bradley v. Board of Educ. of Saranac Community Schs., …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Blackburn v. American Telephone & Telegraph System
See, e.g., Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kelly
Insofar as the Booker rule, as applied to nonjudicial punishments, may have come to rest in part upon a 1973 DoD policy memorandum, we recall that the Court of Military Appeals has observed since Booker that “policy typically is not law.” United States v. Sloan, 35 M.J. 4, 9 (C.M.A.1992); see also United States v. Garwood, 20 M.J. 148, 153-54 (C.M.A.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 456 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ward v. Papa's Pizza to Go, Inc.
See, e.g., Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, 758 F.2d 1435 , 1449 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Methodist Hospital
See Beaumont v. Brown (1977), 401 Mich. 80 , 257 N.W.2d 522, 531 ; Miller v. Motorola, Inc. (1990), 202 Ill. 976 , 148 Ill.Dec. 303, 306 , 560 N.E.2d 900, 903 ; see also McSurely v. McClellan (D.C.Cir.1985), 753 F.2d 88, 112 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ernest Bynum, Jr.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Smith Grading and Paving, Inc., 760 F.2d 527 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Consequently, a litigant has an obligation "to spell out its arguments squarely and distinctly," or else forever hold its peace.' ") (citations omitted); see also Bob Willow Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Corp., 872 F.2d 788, 795 (7th Cir.1989) ("Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(4) sets the standard for an appellant's argument, requiring it to 'contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.' "). 10 We note that there is some confusion in the case law…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maryland and Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association, Inc., D/B/A Marva Maid Dairy
See also United States v. Smith Grading and Paving, Inc., 760 F.2d 527, 533 (4th Cir.) (government need not prove specific intent in per se Sherman Act cases), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 (1985); United States v. Continental Group, Inc., 603 F.2d 444, 460-62 (3d Cir. 1979) (same), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1032 (1980); United States v. Brighton Building and Maintenance Co., 598 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 (1979). 68 Marva Maid argues that the government failed to prove that Elliott had the necessary intent to violate the Sherman Act.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McLaren v. Emory University
See e.g., Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, Inc., 758 F.2d 1435, 1446 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1978); Kolb v. Goldring, Inc., 694 F.2d 869, 872 (1st Cir.1982); Pfeiffer v. Essex Wire Corp., 682 F.2d 684, 685-88 (7th Cir.1982), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1039 , 103 S.Ct. 453 , 74 L.Ed.2d 606 (1982); Fiedler v. Indian Truck Line, Inc., 670 F.2d 806, 809-10 (8th Cir.1982); Naton v. Bank of California, 649 F.2d 691, 699 (9th Cir.1981). 6 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Joyce Johnson and Robert Bandy, Administrators of the Estate of Leport Walton, Deceased v. Chapel Hill Independent School District
See e.g., Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries Inc., 758 F.2d 1435, 1449 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pearce v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.
See, e.g., McSurefy v. McClellan, 753 F.2d 88, 110 (D.C.Cir.) ("the state most concerned with the claim"), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); Clayman v. Goodman Properties, Inc., 518 F.2d 1026 , 1030 n. 22 (D.C.Cir.1973) ("the more significant relationship”); Dowd v. Calabrese, 589 F.Supp. 1206, 1210 (D.D.C.1984) ("the most significant interest”); Fowler v. A & A Co., 262 A.2d 344 , 348 (D.C. 1970) ("the more substantial interest”); McCrossin v. Hicks Chevrolet, Inc., 248 A.2d 917, 920-21 (D.C.1969) (same). 8 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whitt, of the Estate of Whitt
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 85-47.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.