green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Independent Counsel”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
Doughton v. Douglas County
But see Medford Assembly of God v. City of Medford, 297 Or 138 , 681 P2d 790 (1984), cert den 474 US 1020 (1985).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carol A. Davis v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security
there is a strong and firm presumption that governmental officials ... perform their functions without bias. this presumption can be rebutted, but the burden of establishing a disqualifying interest is upon the person making that contention.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sun City Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Citizens Utilities Co.
independent counsel
cited
Cited "see"
Samedan Oil Corp. v. Intrastate Gas Gathering, Inc.
See Hughes v. Houston Northwest Medical Center, 680 S.W.2d 838, 842 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, writ refd n.r.e.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 555 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Department of Transportation v. City of Mosier
See Medford Assembly of God v. City of Medford, 297 Or 138 , 681 P2d 790 (1984), cert den 474 US 1020 (1985); Terraces Condo.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Nunez
See U.S. v. Blackwood, 768 F.2d 131 (7th Cir.1985), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 569 , 88 L.Ed.2d 554 (1985) (holding sufficient evidence from which a jury could find that the defendant, a police officer, sought to influence the disposition or affect the handling of criminal cases through solicitation of bribes, falsification of the Circuit Court (the “enterprise”) records, use of Circuit Court offices and equipment and contact with Circuit Court judges).
cited
Cited "see"
Abed v. Commissioner of Correction
See DiNapoli v. Northeast Regional Parole Commission, 764 F.2d 143, 146 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S. Ct. 568 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Davis
(2×)
See United States v. Blackwood, 768 F.2d 131, 136 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 569 , 88 L.Ed.2d 554 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charlesworth R. Martin v. Theodore Thomas, Milo K. Shepard, Robert L. Prater and L.L. Clarkson
See, Crane v. State of Texas, 759 F.2d 412 , 428 n. 17 (5th Cir.), amended in part, 766 F.2d 193 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 570 , 88 L.Ed.2d 555 (1985) (“The Eleventh Amendment is obviously no bar to actions for damages against officials sued in their individual capacities”); American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi, Inc. v. Finch, 638 F.2d 1336, 1341-42 (5th Cir.Unit A 1981) (“It is well settled, for instance, that a public officer’s conduct can be sufficiently “official” to constitute state action within the meaning of the fourteenth amendment withou…
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Thomas
See, Crane v. State of Texas, 759 F.2d 412 , 428 n. 17 (5th Cir.), amended in part, 766 F.2d 193 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 570 , 88 L.Ed.2d 555 (1985) ("The Eleventh Amendment is obviously no bar to actions for damages against officials sued in their individual capacities"); American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi, Inc. v. Finch, 638 F.2d 1336 , 1341–42 (5th Cir.Unit A 1981) ("It is well settled, for instance, that a public officer's conduct can be sufficiently "official" to constitute state action within the meaning of the fourteenth amendment without at the …
discussed
Cited "see"
International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.
See Hughes v. Houston Northwest Medical Center, Inc., 680 S.W.2d 838 (Tex.App.1984, error ref'd n.r.e.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 555 (1985) ("Litigation is a powerful weapon, and when instituted in bad faith for the purpose of causing damage or loss, it is a wrongful method of interference.”); Garza v. Mitchell, 607 S.W.2d 593, 600 (Tex.Civ.App.1980) (“In order to be tortuous interference with the contract of another the assertion of a right must be without right or justification, and 'the act of interference to be actionable must have been knowingly done w…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cornell Village Tower Condominium v. Department of Housing & Urban Development
See Pietroniro v. Oceanport, 764 F.2d 976 , 980 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 570 , 88 L.Ed.2d 554 (1985); Panola Land Buyers Ass’n v. Shuman, 762 F.2d 1550 , 1557 (11th Cir.1985).
examined
Cited "see"
Cooney v. Park County
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See similarly the practice for arresting with a warrant, Crane v. State of Texas, 759 F.2d 412 , aff'd as modified 766 F.2d 193 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 570 , 88 L.Ed.2d 555 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rios v. Quiros
See, e.g., DiNapoli v. Northeast Regional Parole Commission, 764 F.2d 143 , 145–47 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rios v. Commissioner of Correction
Such guidelines are not laws within the meaning of the ex post facto clause.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 171 ; see also DiNapoli v. Northeast Regional Parole Commission, 764 F.2d 143 , 145–46 (2d Cir.) (federal parole guidelines, promulgated to assist parole commis- sion in its exercise of discretion and under which com- mission remained free to recommend parole date above or below guidelines while retaining discretion to revise or modify guidelines at any time, did not constitute laws within meaning of ex post facto clause), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cheryl Faylor v. Michael Szupper
Compare Delancey v. City of Austin, 570 F.3d 590, 594 (5th Cir.2009) (holding that the URA does not create a private right of action for money damages), with Pietroniro v. Borough of Oceanport, 764 F.2d 976, 980 (3d Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 570 , 88 L.Ed.2d 554 (1985) (holding that a private right of action existed against state officials for violations of § 4625 of the URA due to the absence of a comprehensive enforcement scheme under the Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Green v. State
In determining reasonableness, the nature of the underlying offense is of no moment.”). *611 In Texas, a misdemeanor capias is valid when issued from a court with proper jurisdiction after a neutral magistrate has made a determination of probable cause. 2 See Sharp v. State, 677 S.W.2d 513, 518 (Tex.Crim.App.1984); see also Crane v. Texas, 759 F.2d 412 , 422 (5th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 766 F.2d 193 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 570 , 88 L.Ed.2d 555 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barna v. Travis
See, e.g., DiNapoli v. Northeast Regional Parole Commission, 764 F.2d 143 , 145-47 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barna v. Travis
See, e.g., DiNapoli v. Northeast Regional Parole Commission, 764 F.2d 143, 145-47 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Darryl Freeman, Tyrone Netters
See, e.g., United States v. Blackwood, 768 F.2d 131, 134-36 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 569 , 88 L.Ed.2d 554 (1985); United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108, 132-33 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 , 103 S.Ct. 1891 , 77 L.Ed.2d 282 (1983); United States v. Mazzei, 521 F.2d 639, 643-44 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1014 , 96 S.Ct. 446 , 46 L.Ed.2d 385 (1975); United States v. Wingo, 723 F.Supp. 798, 803-04 (N.D.Ga.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyer v. County of Washington
Contrary to DeClue's contention, the law is clearly established that "under the Fourth Amendment a warrant can be validly issued only by a 'neutral and detached magistrate.' " Fairchild v. Lockhart, 675 F.Supp. 469, 477 (E.D.Ark.1987) (quoting Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480 , 78 S.Ct. 1245 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1958)), aff'd, 857 F.2d 1204 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 884 , 102 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1989); see also Crane v. Texas, 759 F.2d 412 , 426 (5th Cir.), modified, 766 F.2d 193 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 570 , 88 L.Ed.2d 55…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyer v. County of Washington
Contrary to De-Clue’s contention, the law is clearly established that "under the Fourth Amendment a warrant can be validly issued only by a ‘neutral and detached magistrate.”’ Fairchild v. Lockhart, 675 F.Supp. 469, 477 (E.D.Ark.1987) (quoting Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480 , 78 S.Ct. 1245 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1958)), aff’d, 857 F.2d 1204 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 884 , 102 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1989); see also Crane v. Texas, 759 F.2d 412 , 426 (5th Cir.), modified, 766 F.2d 193 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 570 , 88 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yaron v. Township of Northampton
Compare Taylor v. Ouachita Parish School Bd., 648 F.2d 959, 972 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981) (entertaining petition for appellate fees) with Crane v. Texas, 766 F.2d 193, 195 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) (refusing to entertain petition for appellate fees and remanding to district court), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 570 , 88 L.Ed.2d 555 (1985) with Morrow v. Dillard, 580 F.2d 1284, 1296-1300 (5th Cir.1978) (petition brought in court of appeals but remanded to district court for calculation of amount). 13 The Supreme Court of the United States has never decided this question.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yaron v. Township of Northampton
Compare Taylor v. Ouachita Parish School Bd., 648 F.2d 959, 972 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981) (entertaining petition for appellate fees) with Crane v. Texas, 766 F.2d 193, 195 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) (refusing to entertain petition for appellate fees and remanding to district court), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 570 , 88 L.Ed.2d 555 (1985) with Morrow v. Dillard, 580 F.2d 1284, 1296-1300 (5th Cir.1978) (petition brought in court of appeals but remanded to district court for calculation of amount).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Board of Parole
See, e.g., DiNapoli v. Northwest Regional Parole Commission, 764 F2d 143 (2nd Cir), cert den 474 US 1020 (1985); Dufresne v. Baer, 744 F2d 1543 (11th Cir 1984), cert den 474 US 817 ; Roth v. United States Parole Commission, 724 F2d 836 (9th Cir 1984); Stroud v. United States Parole Commission, 668 F2d 843 (5th Cir 1982); Warren v. United States Parole Commission, 212 US App DC 137, 659 F2d 183 (DC Cir 1981), cert den 455 US 950 (1982); Zeidman v. United States Parole Commission, 593 F2d 806 (7th Cir 1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boston v. Lafayette County, Miss.
Compare Bigford, 834 F.2d at 1222 (judge’s deliberate or mistaken departure from controlling law does not represent county policy), with Crane v. State of Texas, 759 F.2d 412 , 430 n. 19 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 570 , 88 L.Ed.2d 555 (1985) (local governments not immunized from official actions which are both unconstitutional and illegal under state law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parker v. Williams
The court in Bowen v. Watkins, 669 F.2d 979, 989 (5th Cir.1982), gave one definition: "When an official has final authority in a matter involving the selection of goals or of means of achieving goals, his choices represent governmental policy." The en banc Fifth Circuit explained that “[plolicymakers act in the place of the govern ing body in the area of their responsibility; they are not supervised except as to the totality of their performance." Bennett v. City of Slidell, 728 F.2d 762, 769 (5th Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1016 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 612 (1985); see …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parker v. Williams
The court in Bowen v. Watkins, 669 F.2d 979, 989 (5th Cir.1982), gave one definition: "When an official has final authority in a matter involving the selection of goals or of means of achieving goals, his choices represent governmental policy." The en banc Fifth Circuit explained that "[p]olicymakers act in the place of the governing body in the area of their responsibility; they are not supervised except as to the totality of their performance." Bennett v. City of Slidell, 728 F.2d 762, 769 (5th Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1016 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 612 (1985); see als…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony J. Bucci, Sr. And Ronald H. Glantz
See United States v. Mazzei, 521 F.2d 639, 643 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1014 , 96 S.Ct. 446 , 46 L.Ed.2d 385 (1975); see also United States v. Blackwood, 768 F.2d 131, 135-36 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 569 , 88 L.Ed.2d 554 (1985).
Maturo
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-282.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1) · D. Connecticut (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.