green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Torres
See United States v. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382, 1408 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sergio Javier Granados
See United States v. Disbrow, 768 F.2d 976, 979 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 577 , 88 L.Ed.2d 560 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sergio J. Granados
See United States v. Disbrow, 768 F.2d 976, 979 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramon Hernandez-Rodriguez
See U.S. v. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 , at 1392-94 (10th Cir.1985) cert. denied 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Evans
See United States v. Andrews, 585 F.2d 961, 964 (10th Cir.1978) (“The nature of the offense of conspiracy with its attendant aspects of secrecy often requires that ele ments of the crime be established by circumstantial evidence.”). 1.Agreement “In conspiracy cases brought under 21 U.S.C. § 846 , the government is required to prove that two or more persons agreed to commit an offense under the Controlled Substances Act.” United States v. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382, 1391 (10th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hilario Mendoza-Salgado, United States of America v. Ramon Edwardo Garcia
See United States v. Espinosa, 771 F.2d *1017 1382, 1410-11 (10th Cir.) (substitution of counsel one day prior to motion hearing and four days prior to trial did not prejudice defendant as ineffective counsel where original attorney’s prior preparation simplified substitution attorney’s work and case was not complex), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Leroy Marquez
See United States v. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382, 1407 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 (1985). 5 Applying this standard, we find no error in the district court's denial of Marquez's motion to suppress.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph William Hill, Jr.
See United States v. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382, 1399 (10th Cir.) (limiting Bruton applications to “clearly inculpatory” comments that are “vitally important to the government’s case”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Isiah
Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); see United States v. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, Foreman v. United States, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnson
See, e.g., United States v. Goff, 847 F.2d 149 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 932 , 109 S.Ct. 324 , 102 L.Ed.2d 341 (1988); United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371 (9th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); see also United States v. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 , 1402-03 n. 27 (10th Cir.) (“[t]he district judge here could have sentenced defendants to consecutive sentences [under § 841 and § 846]”), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnson
See, e.g., United States v. Goff, 847 F.2d 149 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 932 , 109 S.Ct. 324 , 102 L.Ed.2d 341 (1988); United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); see also United States v. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 , 1402-03 n. 27 (10th Cir.) ("[t]he district judge here could have sentenced defendants to consecutive sentences [under § 841 and § 846]"), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985). 36 In this case, Count 1 charged Johnson and Spears with conspiracy to commit various dr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Graham v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Graham)
See, e.g., United States v. Jankowski, 771 F.2d 70 (3d Cir.) (if a judicial decision creates a new principle of law, it should not be applied retroactively), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 578 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Burger
See, e.g., United States v. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382, 1408 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985); United States v. DeSimone, 660 F.2d 532, 539-40 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1027 , 102 S.Ct. 1732 , 72 L.Ed.2d 149 (1982); United States v. Finkelstein, 526 F.2d 517, 524 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 960 , 96 S.Ct. 1742 , 48 L.Ed.2d 205 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Greer v. State
See also United States v. Espinosa , 771 F.2d 1382 , 1393 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 579 , 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Douglas David Ascarrunz
As the Ninth Circuit has recognized, however, “the converse is not true; statements made by an unarrested co-conspirator who is still operating in furtherance of the ongoing conspiracy may be introduced against the arrested conspirator.” United States v. Taylor, 802 F.2d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.1986) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1309 , 94 L.Ed.2d 164 (1987); see also United States v. Disbrow, 768 F.2d 976, 982 (8th Cir.) (stating that “the arrest of one coconspirator does not necessarily terminate the conspiracy”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023 , 106 S.Ct. 577 …
Froneberger
v.
Armstrong
v.
Armstrong
No. 85-5620.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1985.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.