green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1990 ·
…it is our view that one who owns land in a foreign country looks to the laws of that country to determine his incidents of ownership including his rights in the event of expropriation.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Rickey Hill v. City of Pontotoc, Mississippi, City of Pontotoc, Mississippi
See Simien, 809 F.2d at 258 ; Laje, 665 F.2d at 730 ; Wilson v. Taylor, 658 F.2d 1021, 1035 (5th Cir.1981); but see Wheeler v. Mental Health & Mental Retardation Authority, 752 F.2d 1063, 1070 (5th Cir.) (holding that back pay for period between infirm procedure and proper post-discharge hearing may be awarded), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 824 , 106 S.Ct. 78 , 88 L.Ed.2d 64 (1985). 2 Hill had one hearing, and it failed to comport with due process.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United Nuclear Corporation v. The United States
(2×)
it is our view that one who owns land in a foreign country looks to the laws of that country to determine his incidents of ownership including his rights in the event of expropriation.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Solomon v. Hall-Brooke Foundation, No. Icz-Cv-83 213998 (Feb. 11, 1992)
Ct. 78, 88 L.Ed.2d 64 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ashkir v. United States
See Langenegger v. United States, 756 F.2d 1565, 1570 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 824 , 106 S.Ct. 78 , 88 L.Ed.2d 64 (1985) (American citizen has standing to allege taking of interests in large coffee plantation in El Salvador); Seery v. United States, 130 Ct.Cl. 481 , 127 F.Supp. 601, 603 (1955) (same for U.S. citizen’s property in Austria); Wiggins v. United States, 3 Ct.Cl. 412, 422 (1867) (same for U.S. citizen’s property in Costa Rica).
discussed
Cited "see"
Islamic Center of Mississippi, Inc. v. City of Starkville, Mississippi
(2×)
Id. at 895 n. 11, 104 S.Ct. at 1547 n. 11; see Wheeler v. Mental Health & Mental Retardation Auth., 752 F.2d 1063 , 1073 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 824 , 106 S.Ct. 78 , 88 L.Ed.2d 64 (1985). .
cited
Cited "see"
Gary Moore v. The Big Picture Company
See Bolling v. Baker, 671 S.W.2d 559, 569 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1984, writ dism’d w.o.j.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 824 , 106 S.Ct. 79 , 88 L.Ed.2d 64 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allgood v. State
See, for example, Williams v. State, 491 A.2d 1129, 1132 (Del.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 78 , 88 L.Ed.2d 64 (1985); Gillum v. State, 681 P.2d 87, 88 (Okla.Crim.App.1984); Stevens v. State, 419 So.2d 1058, 1062 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 , 103 S.Ct. 1236 , 75 L.Ed.2d 469 (1983); State v. Jackson, 325 N.W.2d 819, 822 (Minn.1982); State v. Trujillo, 93 N.M. 724, 725 , 605 P.2d 232 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Casa De Cambio Comdiv S.A. de C.V. v. United States
See also Langenegger v. United States, 756 F.2d 1565 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 824 , 106 S.Ct. 78 , 88 L.Ed.2d 64 (1985) (expropriation of plaintiffs property by the El Salvador government pursuant to legislation passed at the prompting of the United States held not a taking by the United States).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David R. Kittay, Trustee v. Daniel J. Kornstein and Kornstein Veisz & Wexler
Law App. (McKinney 1992) 4 ; see also Oneida of Thames Band v. New York, 757 F.2d 19, 22 (2d Cir.) (noting that “clients may give informed consent to joint representation despite actual or potential adverse interests”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 823 , 106 S.Ct. 78 , 88 L.Ed.2d 64 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Coats v. Vawter (In Re Coats)
See also, Wheeler v. Mental Health & Mental Retardation Auth., 752 F.2d 1063 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 824 , 106 S.Ct. 78 , 88 L.Ed.2d 64 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Healey v. Chelsea Resources Ltd.
See, e.g., Oneida of Thames Band v. New York, 757 F.2d 19, 22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 823 , 106 S.Ct. 78 , 88 L.Ed.2d 64 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. State of NY
See id.; see also Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. New York, 691 F.2d 1070, 1079-80 (2d Cir.1982) (applying Moe in Eleventh Amendment context), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 823 , 106 S.Ct. 78 , 88 L.Ed.2d 64 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Soto v. Lord
See Carey, 435 U.S. at 260 , 98 S.Ct. at 1050 ; Kendall, 627 F.2d at 6 & n. 6; see also Wheeler v. Mental Health & Mental Retardation Auth., 752 F.2d 1063 , 1071 (5th Cir.) (“back pay is not recoverable when the employer can show that the discharge would still have occurred absent procedural [due process] defects”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 824 , 106 S.Ct. 78 , 88 L.Ed.2d 64 (1985); Burt v. Abel, 585 F.2d 613, 616 (4th Cir.1978) (since plaintiff’s discharge was justified, on remand plaintiff would be precluded from alleging as damages from procedural deprivation lost pay or lost retirement…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wheeler
v.
Mental Health and Mental Retardation Authority of Harris County
v.
Mental Health and Mental Retardation Authority of Harris County
No. 84-1911.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.