Geer v. Bowers, 371 U.S. 36 (1962). · Go Syfert
Geer v. Bowers, 371 U.S. 36 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
238 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 76 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pavlinko v. Yale-New Haven Hospital (conn, 1984-01-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Pavlinko v. Yale-New Haven Hospital
Conn. · 1984 · confidence medium
S. Ct. 115, 9 L.
discussed Cited "see" Bonilla v. Las Vegas Cigar Co.
D. Nev. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Link v. Wabash Railroad, 370 U.S. 626, 633-34 , 82 S.Ct. 1386 , 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962) (“Petitioner voluntarily chose this attorney as his representative in the action, and he cannot now avoid the consequences of the acts or omissions of this freely selected agent.”), reh’g denied, 371 U.S. 873 , 83 S.Ct. 115 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962); Toth v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 862 F.2d 1381, 1387 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed Cited "see" Bonfiglio v. Shammah (In Re Bonfiglio)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
Federal Rule 37(b)(2)(C) states: (b) Failure to Comply with Order. * * * * * * (2) Sanctions by court in which action is pending.... [T]he court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others the following: ♦ if; s{i (C) An order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party; See Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 , 82 S.Ct. 1386 , 8 L.Ed.2d 7…
discussed Cited "see" People v. Renaud (2×)
Colo. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bizup v. People, 150 Colo. 214 , 371 P.2d 786 (1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 873 , 83 S.Ct. 144 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962) (rejecting defendant’s claim that predicate felony of robbery had been completed at the time of the subsequent killing and concluding the homicide emanated from and was within the res gestae of the initial felony); People v. Hicham, supra (shots fired by security guard. leading to shootout in which guard was killed were not intervening events which caused the guard’s death to be outside scope of the felony).
cited Cited "see" Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 633-34 , 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1390-91 , reh'g denied, 371 U.S. 873 , 83 S.Ct. 115 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962); Super Sack Mfg.
discussed Cited "see" Zaczek v. Fauquier County, Va.
E.D. Va. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626 , 82 S.Ct. 1386 , 8 L.Ed.2d 734 , reh’g denied, 371 U.S. 873 , 83 S.Ct. 115 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962); White v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 783 F.2d 1175 (4th Cir.1986) (inherent authority to dismiss to control docket recognized and approved).
discussed Cited "see" Charson v. Temple Israel (2×)
Minn. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 633-34 , 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1390-91 , 8 L.Ed.2d 734 reh’g denied, 371 U.S. 873 , 83 S.Ct. 115 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962).
discussed Cited "see" Jones v. City of Richmond
E.D. Va. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mansour v. Reeves Buildings, Inc., 383 F.Supp. 482, 484-85 (S.D.W.Va.1973), aff'd, 504 F.2d 812 (4th Cir.1974) (“Notice to, or knowledge of, an attorney for a party to a legal proceeding of matters arising in the course of the litigation or proceeding is ordinarily imputable to such party.”) In Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 633-34 , 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1390 , 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (quoting Smith v. Ayer, 11 Otto 320 , 101 U.S. 320 , 25 L.Ed. 955 ), reh. denied, 371 U.S. 873 , 83 S.Ct. 115 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962) the Supreme Court in dealing with the issue stated: Petitioner voluntarily …
discussed Cited "see" Hudson v. Johnstone (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Alaska · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kavanagh v. Brown, 206 F.Supp. 479, 482-85 (E.D.Mich.), aff’d per curiam, 371 U.S. 35 , 83 S.Ct. 143 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962); Taylor v. State, 360 Mich. 146 , 103 N.W.2d 769, 773-74 (Mich. 1960); Shubat v. State, 157 Mont. 143 , 484 P.2d 278, 284-86 (Mont.1971).
discussed Cited "see" Kasparek v. Johnson County Board of Health (2×)
Iowa · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Los Angeles, 57 Cal.2d 515 , 370 P.2d 342 , 20 Cal.Rptr. 638 , appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 371 U.S. 36 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962); Sax, Takings and the Police Power, 74 Yale L.J. 36 , 43-44 (1964).
cited Cited "see" Hopewell v. University of Pittsburgh
W.D. Pa. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alabama v. U. S., 304 F.2d 583, 586 (5th Cir.) aff’d per curiam, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962). .
cited Cited "see" Reynolds v. State ex rel. Wallace
Ala. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See [State of] Alabama v. United States, supra ( 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 ); United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58 , 80 S.Ct. 612 , 4 L.Ed.2d 535 . * * * ” .
discussed Cited "see" McGill v. Ryals
M.D. Ala. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hamer et al. v. Campbell et a., supra. The “freezing” doctrine was first used in the field of voting to eliminate the effects of past discrimination, United States v. State of Alabama, 192 F.Supp. 677 (M.D.Ala.1961), aff’d 304 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), aff’d per curiam, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962)..
cited Cited "see" United States v. Mayton
5th Cir. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alabama v. United States, 5 Cir, 1962, 304 F.2d 583, 592 , aff’d mem., 1962, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 ; United States v. Manning, W.D.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. State of Louisiana (2×)
E.D. La. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See State of Alabama v. United States, 5 Cir. 1962, 304 F.2d 583 , aff’d 1962, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 .
cited Cited "see" Taggart v. Vermont Transportation Co.
E.D. Pa. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626 , 82 S.Ct. 1386 , 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962), rehearing den. 371 U.S. 873 , 83 S.Ct. 115 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Yates v. State (2×)
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Bizup v. People, 150 Colo. 214 , 371 P.2d 786, 788 (affirming a conviction for felony murder because the killing and underlying robbery “were so closely connected in point of time, place and continuity of action as to be one continuous transaction.”), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 873 , 83 S.Ct. 144 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962); State v. Kunellis, 276 Kan. 461 , 78 P.3d 776, 788 (2003) (“We have stated that time, distance, and the causal relationship between the underlying felony and a killing are factors to be considered in determining whether the killing occurs during the commission of o…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States of America, United States of America, State of Louisiana, Intervenor-Appellee v. Marine Shale Processors, Cross-Appellee
5th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
United Steelworkers of America v. United States, 361 U.S. 39, 60-61 , 80 S.Ct. 1, 4-5 , 4 L.Ed.2d 12 (1959) (Frankfurter, J., concurring) (discussing the judiciary’s historic use of equity powers, at the request of the sovereign, to enjoin activity found to be a public nuisance); Environmental Waste Control, 917 F.2d at 332; Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Lamphier, 714 F.2d 331, 337-38 (4th Cir.1983); see also Alabama v. United States, 304 F.2d 583 , 591 & n. 24 (5th Cir.), aff'd, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Guffie (2×)
Colo. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See People v. Lewis, supra; see also Bizup v. People, 150 Colo. 214 , 371 P.2d 786 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 873 , 83 S.Ct. 144 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962) (felony murder is committed when robbery and homicide are part of same continuous transaction).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Johnson v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF LARAMIE CTY.
Wyo. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
Bank v. Iron Mountain Ranch Co., 45 Wyo. 265 , 18 P.2d 623, 628-629 ; see also, Link v. Wabash Railroad Company, 370 U.S. 626 , 82 S.Ct. 1386 , 8 L.Ed.2d 734 , rehearing denied 371 U.S. 873 , 83 S.Ct. 115 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 , which cites Moshannon in its approval and discussion of such rules.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Randolph v. United States Elevator Corp.
S.D. Fla. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State of Alabama v. United States, 304 F.2d 583, 587 (5th Cir. 1962), aff’d per curiam, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962); Brooks v. Beto, 366 F.2d 1, 9 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. den., 1967, 386 U.S. 975 , 87 S.Ct. 1169 , 18 L.Ed.2d 135 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Blanchard McLeod United States of America v. Dallas County
5th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also the broad injunction against private acts of coercion and intimidation issued in United States v. Original Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, E.D.La. 1965, 250 F.Supp. 330 (3-judge). 58 In State of Alabama v. United States, 5 Cir. 1961, 304 F.2d 583 , aff'd, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 , we specifically noted the broad equity powers section 1971(c) conferred upon the federal courts.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Theron C. Lynd, Circuit Clerk and Registrar of Voters of Forrest County and the State of Mississippi
5th Cir. · 1965 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. State of Alabama, 5 Cir., 1962, 304 F.2d 583 , affirmed, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GEER
v.
BOWERS, TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO
No. 304.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 22, 1962.
371 U.S. 36
H. Herschel Hunt for appellants., Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Theodore R. Saker and Joseph L. White, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
Published
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.