green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
46 Labs LLC v. Parler LLC
Pursuant to Rule 15(a), a court 25 should “freely” give leave to amend “when justice so requires,” and in the absence of a reason 26 such as “undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to 1 cure deficiencies by amendment previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by 2 virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of the amendment, etc.” Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 3 178, 182 (1962). 4 III.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Timmerman Starlite Trucking, Inc. v. Ingredion Incorporated
Rule 15(a)(2)’s mandate rests upon the notion that “[i]f 28 the underlying facts or circumstances relied upon by a plaintiff 1 may be a proper subject of relief, he ought to be afforded an 2 opportunity to test his claim on the merits.” Foman, 371 U.S. 3 at 182. 4 In light of Rule 15(a)’s text and purpose, the Ninth 5 Circuit has instructed that “[c]ourts may decline to grant leave 6 to amend only if there is strong evidence of ‘undue delay, bad 7 faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated 8 failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, 9 undue pr…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Prince George's County v. Collington Crossroads, Inc.
Authority, 12 N.Y.2d 379 , 190 N.E.2d 402, 404-406 , 240 N.Y.S.2d 1 , appeal dismissed, 375 U. S. 78 , 84 S. Ct. 194 , 11 L.Ed.2d 141 , reh. denied, 375 U. S. 960 , 84 S. Ct. 440 , 11 L.Ed.2d 318 (1963); Cannata v. City of New York, 11 N.Y.2d 210 , 182 N.E.2d 395 , 227 N.Y.S.2d 903 , appeal dismissed, 371 U. S. 4 , 83 S. Ct. 28 , 9 L.Ed.2d 48 11962), with City of Little Kock v. Rames, 241 Ark. 1071 , 411 S.W.2d 486 (1967); Opinion of the Justices, 152 Me. 440 , 131 A. 2d 904 (1957); Opinion of the Justices, 332 Mass. 769 , 126 N.E.2d 795 (1955); Hogue v. Port of Seattle, 54 Wash. 2d 799 , 341 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ERRINGTON
v.
MISSOURI
v.
MISSOURI
No. 157.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1962.
Walter A. Raymond and Kenneth C. West for appellant.
Consideration, Took.
Published
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.