green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. James Badger, Roscoe Foreman, Marcia F. Ivy, and Mariano \Mario\" Lettieri"
Because no ruling was made on the motion in limine and because no contemporaneous objection was made at trial, we review for plain error. 7 United States v. Brantley, 786 F.2d 1322, 1327-28 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 477 U.S. 908 , 106 5.Ct. 3284, 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. State Of Delaware Department Of Health And Social Services
This involves a review of all individuals in the position, id. at 579, 645-52, as well as a comparison of the job with others in the state system.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Delaware Department of Health & Social Services
This involves a review of all individuals in the position, id. at 579, 645-52, as well as a comparison of the job with others in the state system.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Philadelphia Detention Center
“The Rule 50(b) motion may consider only specific grounds asserted in the motion for a directed verdict.” Orlando v. Billcon Int’l, Inc., 822 F.2d 1294 , 1298 (3d Cir.1987); see Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., 752 F.2d 802, 814 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986); Abraham v. Pekarski, 728 F.2d 167, 172 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1242 , 104 S.Ct. 3513 , 82 L.Ed.2d 822 (1984); Mallick v. International Bhd. of Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anserphone, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
See 15 U.S.C. § 15 . *426 “To survive a summary judgment motion on its Sherman Act § 2 monopolization claim, [plaintiff must] show that (1) [defendants] possessed monopoly power in the relevant market, and that (2) [defendants] willfully acquired and maintained monopoly power and did not acquire its monopoly share due to ‘growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historical accident.’ ” Ideal Dairy, 90 F.3d at 749 (quoting Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp., 752 F.2d 802, 808 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 328…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Veilleux
See United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 6 (1st Cir.) (government's breach of promise not to prosecute may warrant dismissal of indictment or "other appropriate relief”), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986); United States v. Rodman, 519 F.2d 1058 (1st Cir.1975) (approving dismissal of indictment when SEC breached agreement to make no prosecution recommendation in exchange for defendant's cooperation); In re Snoonian, 502 F.2d 110 (1st Cir.1974) (government’s breach of promise not to prosecute would give rise to estoppel) (citing Santobello v. New York, 4…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nevius
Under section 1001, “the test for materiality is whether the false statement has a tendency to influence or is capablé of influencing a federal agency.” Brack, 747 F.2d at 1147 ; see United States v. Brantley, 786 F.2d 1322, 1326 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908, 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zenon Hernandez
(2×)
See United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 10 (1st Cir.) (when suspect answered police officer’s questions in English before they were translated, district court could find that he intelligently waived Miranda rights), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908, 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melvin Ashley
As the Supreme Court has stated, sections 2518(l)(c) and 2518(3)(c) are “simply designed to assure that wiretapping is not resorted to in situations where traditional investigative techniques would suffice to expose the crime.” United States v. Kahn, 415 U.S. at 153 n. 12, 94 S.Ct. at 983 n. 12; accord, United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 11 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joyner
See United States v. Brantley, 786 F.2d 1322, 1327 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. State of Delaware Department of Health & Social Services
See Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., 752 F.2d 802, 814 (3d Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fischer Bros. v. NWA, Inc.
Accord, Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., 559 F.Supp. 922 (E.D.Pa.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986); and Juneau Square Corp. v. First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee, 445 F.Supp. 965 (E.D.Wis.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Munson
See United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 8-9 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William W. Lilly
See *311 id.; see also United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 6 (1st Cir.) (remanding for evidentiary hearing because sufficient threshold showing was made), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Linda Kowalski, A/K/A Linda Larochelle, Etc. v. Richard J. Gagne, Aetna Life and Casualty Company, in Intervention v. Richard Joseph Gagne and Linda Kowalski, A/K/A Linda Larochelle as the Administratrix of the Estate of Robert John Kowalski, in Intervention
See Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(1); see also United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 8-9 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986); Bryant v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 672 F.2d 217, 220 (1st Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kowalski v. Gagne
See Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(1); see also United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 8-9 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986); Bryant v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 672 F.2d 217, 220 (1st Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gary Nerlinger and Robert Varipapa
See 4 Weinstein’s Evidence ¶ 801(d)(2)(E)[01], at 801-248-49 (1988); see also United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 8 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William F. Shriver
See, e.g., United States v. Brantley, 786 F.2d 1322, 1329 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986) (misappropriation of funds by use of youth organization's credit card for personal purposes admissible to show defendant's intent, and is similar to charge of defrauding the organization in a furniture leasing arrangement). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Garner
Under the plain error doctrine, we must search for "an actual miscarriage of justice, which implies the conviction of one who but for the error would have been acquitted." United States v. Silverstein, 732 F.2d 1338, 1349 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct. 792 , 83 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985); see also United States v. Brantley, 786 F.2d 1322, 1328 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986). 101 The defendant argues that he had not raised the issue of the Wagner & Sons notebook in his argument, and that the issue of intent, to which the prosecut…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Garner
Under the plain error doctrine, we must search for “an actual miscarriage of justice, which implies the conviction of one who but for the error would have been acquitted.” United States v. Silverstein, 732 F.2d 1338, 1349 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct. 792 , 83 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985); see also United States v. Brantley, 786 F.2d 1322, 1328 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908 , 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerry Whaley
See also United States v. Brantley, 786 F.2d 1322, 1328 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986), and United States v. Gironda, 758 F.2d 1201, 1216 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1004 , 106 S.Ct. 523 , 88 L.Ed.2d 456 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perri v. Director, Department of Corrections of Illinois
Compare United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 10 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986) (The fact that defendant, a foreigner, had lived in the United States for 16 years, and answered questions in English before they were translated, supported a finding that he understood English and his Miranda warnings sufficiently to knowingly waive his rights.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stano Perri v. Director, Department of Corrections, State of Illinois
Compare United States v. Abou-Saada, 785 F.2d 1, 10 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 3283 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986) (The fact that defendant, a foreigner, had lived in the United States for 16 years, and answered questions in English before they were translated, supported a finding that he understood English and his Miranda warnings sufficiently to knowingly waive his rights.). 21 Finally, based on the totality of the circumstances, 6 and relying on the state court's subsidiary factual findings, see Matusiak v. Kelly, 786 F.2d 536, 543 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, --- U.S. ----,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Walsh Trucking Co.
See also Terry's Floor Fashions v. Burlington Industries, 568 F.Supp. 205, 215 (E.D.N.C.1983), aff'd, 763 F.2d 604 , 606 n. 1, 615 (4th Cir.1985), Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Co., 752 F.2d 802 , 811 n. 3 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986); Von Kalinowski, 3 Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation Sec. 9.02 at 9-35 (1986) Courts have confused the elements of conspiracy to monopolize with those of attempt to monopolize.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Walsh Trucking Co.
See also Terry's Floor Fashions v. Burlington Industries, 568 F.Supp. 205, 215 (E.D.N.C.1983), aff'd, 763 F.2d 604 , 606 n. 1, 615 (4th Cir.1985), Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Co., 752 F.2d 802 , 811 n. 3 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 3284 , 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986); Von Kalinowski, 3 Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 9.02[1] at 9-35 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
v.
Bonjorno
v.
Bonjorno
No. 84-1907.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 1986.
Certiorari.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White would grant certiorari.