green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Moeller
(2×)
See State v. Breazeale, 238 Kan. 714 , 714 P.2d 1356, 1358 (1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 164 , 93 L.Ed.2d 102 (1986), (same result involving the use by the defendant of "a small handgun"); State v. Thomas, 110 Ariz. 106 , 515 P.2d 851, 853 (1973)(wherein the court relied in part on the defendant's use of "a knife" and that "the geographical location of the crimes was either in the defendant's neighborhood or in areas where he previously resided"); State v. Braman, 191 Conn. 670 , 469 A.2d 760, 764 (1983) ("a shotgun with a cut-down configuration and a small automatic pistol");…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. DePrima
See United States v. Mest, 789 F.2d 1069 (4th Cir.) (holding that a change in the Federal Rules of Evidence which was procedural in nature does not violate the ex post facto clause), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 163 , 93 L.Ed.2d 102 (1986); United States v. Alexander, 805 F.2d 1458 (11th Cir.1986) (holding that new Rule 704(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence does not violate the ex post facto clause).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roland Arthur Edwards
See United States v. Mest, 789 F.2d 1069, 1071-72 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 163 , 93 L.Ed.2d 102 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thunder Hawk Ex Rel. Jensen v. Union Pacific Railroad
GRAham, Federal Practice and Procedure: Evidence § 6651 (interim ed. 1992); see also United States v. Mest, 789 F.2d 1069, 1073-74 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 163 , 93 L.Ed.2d 102 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sexton v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct
The Eighth Circuit, and several other circuits, have held that the statute could be applied retroactively “because it represented a procedural, as opposed to substantive, change in the applicable law.” U.S. v. Bartlett, 856 F.2d 1071 , 1077 n. 7 (8th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Mest, 789 F.2d 1069, 1072-73 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 846 , 107 S.Ct. 163 , 93 L.Ed.2d 102 (1986); United States v. Prickett, 790 F.2d 35, 37 (6th Cir.1986); United States v. Alexander, 805 F.2d 1458, 1461-62 (11th Cir.1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Breazeale
v.
Kansas
v.
Kansas
No. 85-7209.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Published
Sup. Ct. Kan. Certio-rari denied.