green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.9 score
“the treble damages remedy is a potent weapon, necessarily assumes that economic injury has occurred”
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Denieva v. Reyes
(2×)
But cf. Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 304-06 (6th Cir.1986) (district court did not err in striking motion to reconsider denial of qualified immunity because defendants so moved more than 30 days after denial of qualified immunity), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987).
discussed
Cited "but see"
DeNieva v. Reyes
(2×)
But cf. Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 304-06 (6th Cir.1986) (district court did not err in striking motion to reconsider denial of qualified immunity because defendants so moved more than 30 days after denial of qualified immunity), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Northeast Women's Center, Inc. v. Michael Mcmonagle
But see Religious Technology Center v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076, 1077 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987) (injunctive relief not available); In Re Fredeman Litigation, 843 F.2d 821, 828-30 (5th Cir.1988) (suggesting approval of Wollersheim ).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Northeast Women's Center, Inc. v. McMonagle
But see Religious Technology Center v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076, 1077 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987) (injunctive relief not available); In Re Fredeman Litigation, 843 F.2d 821, 828-30 (5th Cir.1988) (suggesting approval of Wollersheim).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bakala v. Krupa
njunctive relief is not available to a private party in a civil rico action.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
FMC Corp. v. Boesky
the treble damages remedy is a potent weapon, necessarily assumes that economic injury has occurred
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Waste Conversion, Inc. v. Sims
In that case, the court held that interlocutory appeals from denials of qualified immunity are subject to “the same temporal limitations that are applicable generally to the perfection of appeals.” Id. at 301.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
John English v. Dennis Dyke Terry Pitcher Pamela Withrow and Linda Flanagan
(2×)
Id. at 299.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Dickerson v. McClellan
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
“The quid pro quo is obvious: in exchange for the defendant’s right to interrupt the judicial process, the court may expect a reasonable modicum of diligence in the exercise of that right.” Id. at 301.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Jerome Yates, Jameela Yates v. City of Cleveland, Sanford L. Currie, Officer
(4×)
Hanton v. Kennedy, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987), this court held that the right to take an interlocutory appeal of a denial of qualified immunity was "subject to waiver for noncompliance with reasonable temporal limitations placed by the district court upon the filing of motions seeking immunity." Id. at 298.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See Bentley v. Cleveland County Bd. of County Com'rs, 41 F.3d 600 , 604-05 (10th Cir. 1994) (citing, e.g., Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 300 [6th Cir. 1986] [“ ‘[I]mmunity, whether qualified or absolute, is an affirmative defense which must be affirmatively pleaded . . . .’ ”], cert. denied 479 U.S. 1103 [1987]).
cited
Cited "see"
Andrews v. Roadway Express Inc
See Salinas v. Roadway Express, Inc., 802 F.2d 787 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eddie L. Andrews Arthur Morris Johnson Herbert C. Perkins James E. Phipps, Sr. v. Roadway Express Inc.
(2×)
See Salinas v. Roadway Express, Inc., 802 F.2d 787 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1335 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Dewayne Johnson v. Matthew Jochums
See Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 304-05 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Outdoor Systems, Inc., an Arizona Corporation Milton Lee, Trustee for the Danny O. Lee Trust v. City of Mesa, an Arizona Municipal Corporation, Outdoor Systems, Inc., an Arizona Corporation Milton Lee, Trustee for the Danny O. Lee Trust v. City of Mesa, an Arizona Municipal Corporation, Whiteco Metrocom, Inc., an Indiana Corporation v. City of Tucson, an Arizona Municipal Corporation, Whiteco Metrocom, Inc., an Indiana Corporation v. City of Tucson
See Major Media of the Southeast, Inc. v. City of Raleigh, 792 F.2d 1269, 1273 (4th Cir.1986) (Major Media ) (rejecting similar argument), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1102 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. City of Mesa
See Major Media of the Southeast, Inc. v. City of Raleigh, 792 F.2d 1269, 1273 (4th Cir.1986) (Major Media) (rejecting similar argument), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1102 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Collins v. Coastline Construction
(2×)
See Salinas v. Roadway Express, Inc., 802 F.2d 787, 789 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1335 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1986). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
Reebok International, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enterprises, Inc.
See Religious Technology Center v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076, 1088 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Reebok International, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enterprises, Inc.
See Religious Technology Center v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076, 1088 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillip Fry, Susan Fry v. Olin Melaragno, David W. Otto, Mark Barnes, Mark Pendery
(2×)
See Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 299 (6th Cir.1986) (noting that because Mitchell contemplates that immunity may be raised before trial on both a motion to dismiss and for summary judgment, "it is possible that the progress of civil rights actions ... may be interrupted by not one but two interlocutory appeals”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
Cagle v. Gilley
See Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mays-Ott Co., Inc. v. Town of Nags Head
See Major Media of the Southeast, Inc. v. City of Raleigh, 621 F.Supp. 1446 (E.D.N.C.1985), aff 'd, 792 F.2d 1269 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1102 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987); Williams v. City of Columbia, 906 F.2d 994 (4th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
DiLoreto v. Borough of Oaklyn
(2×)
See Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 300 (6th Cir.1986) (“failure to plead immunity may, at different stages of the litigation, work either a partial or complete waiver”), cert, denied sub nomine Hanton v. Kennedy, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987); Kelson v. City of Springfield, 767 F.2d 651, 657 (9th Cir.1985) (suggesting that defendants be permitted to raise defense of qualified immunity on remand where no answer had been filed, district court had improperly granted motion to dismiss, and plaintiffs were to be permitted to file amended complaint); Troxler…
cited
Cited "see"
Karen S. Russo, Cross-Appellant v. The City of Cincinnati, Robert Scholl, Sandra Lemker, Richard Sizemore, Cross-Appellees (90-3465) Richard Sizemore, (90-3432)
See Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jose Zayas-Green v. Sergio Casaine, Jose Zayas-Green v. Sergio Casaine, Etc., Appeal of Esteban Davila-Diaz
(2×)
See Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 301 (6th Cir.1986) (“[I]f the order [denying immunity] is appealable at all, it must be appealed within the time set by law, here thirty days, or the right must be considered to have been waived.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lincoln House, Inc. v. Paul W. Dupre
See Religious Technology Center v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076, 1080-89 (9th Cir.1986) (injunctive relief is not available in private civil RICO actions), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Townsend v. Cramblett
See Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 300 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Secure Services Technology, Inc. v. Time & Space Processing, Inc.
See Religious Technology Center v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076, 1090 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. Berger
See New Jersey Citizen Action v. Edison Twp., 797 F.2d 1250 , 1256 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied sub nom., 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 186 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Republic of the Philippines v. Ferdinand E. Marcos
(2×)
See Religious Technology Center v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076, 1088-89 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Matek v. Murat
See Religious Technology Center v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076, 1084 (9th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Karen W. Klyce v. Carlos Ramirez, M.D., and John Gonzalez, M.D.
See Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 299-300 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987) 7 Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) provides: Judgment Upon Multiple Claims or Involving Multiple Parties.
discussed
Cited "see"
The Ecclesiastical Order Of The Ism Of Am, Inc. v. Joseph Chasin
See Ecclesiastical Order of the Ism of Am, Inc. v. Comm'r, 80 T.C. 833 (1983), aff'd, 740 F.2d 967 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1015 , 105 S.Ct. 2018 , 85 L.Ed.2d 300 (1985). 27 In Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 299 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987), this court found that 28 "[w]here a defendant is entitled to qualified immunity the plaintiff must plead facts which, if true, describe a violation of a clearly established statutory or constitutional right of which a reasonable public official, under an objective standard, w…
cited
Cited "see"
Ball v. Farm & Home Savings Ass'n
See Salinas v. Roadway Express, Inc., 802 F.2d 787, 789 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1335 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chang v. Chen
See also Religious Technology Ctr. v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076 , 1082-83 (9th Cir.1986) (discussing limited remedies conferred on private plaintiffs ), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ming-Chu Chang v. Shu-Jen Tseng Chen
See also Religious Technology Ctr. v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076 , 1082-83 (9th Cir.1986) (discussing limited remedies conferred on private plaintiffs), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vermont Microsystems, Inc. v. Autodesk, Inc.
In addition to being subject to reasonable measures to insure their secrecy, trade secrets also must “[d]erive[] independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to the public or to other persons who can obtain economic value from [their] disclosure or use.” Cal.Civ.Code § 3426.1(d)(1); see also Religious Technology Ctr. v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076 , 1090 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vermont Microsystems, Inc. v. Autodesk, Inc.
In addition to being subject to reasonable measures to insure their secrecy, trade secrets also must "[d]erive[ ] independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to the public or to other persons who can obtain economic value from [their] disclosure or use." Cal.Civ.Code § 3426.1(d)(1); see also Religious Technology Ctr. v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076 , 1090 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bentley v. Cleveland County Board of County Commissioners ex rel. Cleveland County
(2×)
See, e.g., Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 300 (6th Cir.1986) (“[Ijmmunity, whether qualified or absolute, is an affirmative defense which must be affirmatively pleaded ...cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987); Jakobsen v. Massachusetts Port Auth., 520 F.2d 810, 813-16 (1st Cir.1975) (waiving statutory limit on port authority’s liability).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bentley v. Cleveland County Board Of County Commissioners
(2×)
See, e.g., Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 300 (6th Cir.1986) ("[I]mmunity, whether qualified or absolute, is an affirmative defense which must be affirmatively pleaded ...."), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987); Jakobsen v. Massachusetts Port Auth., 520 F.2d 810, 813-16 (1st Cir.1975) (waiving statutory limit on port authority's liability). 20 Permitting the County to raise this issue at this stage of the proceedings would be extremely unfair to Bentley, who may have been able to prove some exception to the damage cap at trial if he had notice of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mitchell v. Commission On Adult Entertainment Establishments Of The State Of Delaware
Id., 491 U.S. at 796-800 , 109 S.Ct. at 2757-58; see also New Jersey Citizen Action v. Edison Township, 797 F.2d 1250, 1255 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 186 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mitchell v. Commission on Adult Entertainment Establishments
Id., 491 U.S. at 796-800 , 109 S.Ct. at 2757-58; see also New Jersey Citizen Action v. Edison Township, 797 F.2d 1250, 1255 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 186 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Artists' Theater Circuit, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia
(2×)
See, e.g., Major Media of the Southeast, Inc. v. City of Raleigh, 792 F.2d 1269 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1102 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987). [3] There may be circumstances in which the mere designation of a property as historic would constitute a taking due to the extreme financial hardship resulting from such designation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vote Choice v. Di Stefano
A PAC formed for such a purpose is subject to the first dollar disclosure requirement. 18 association." Minnesota State Ethical Practices Bd. v. National Rifle Ass'n, 761 F.2d 509 , 513 (8th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1082 (1986); see also New Jersey Citizens Action v. Edison Township, 797 F.2d 1250 , 1265 (3d Cir. 1986) (requiring that government demonstrate a special risk stemming from a particular form of first amendment activity in order to justify disclosure requirements for that form of activity), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vote Choice, Inc. v. Joseph Distefano, Etc., Elizabeth Leonard, Vote Choice, Inc. v. Joseph Distefano, Etc.
This zigging and zagging is of especial concern because, when citizens engage in first amendment activity affecting elections, the state’s interest in disclosure is generally a constant, that is, the state’s interest “is the same whether or not [the individual actors] are members of an association.” Minnesota State Ethical Practices Bd. v. National Rifle Ass’n, 761 F.2d 509, 513 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1082, 106 S.Ct. 853 , 88 L.Ed.2d 893 (1986); see also New Jersey Citizens Action v. Edison Township, 797 F.2d 1250 , 1265 (3d Cir.1986) (requiring that *35 government de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
No. 92-1201
(2×)
Our review of the record and authorities persuades us that the district court's first order was not final and that the time for taking an appeal did not begin to run upon entry of that order. 23 "An appeal taken under the collateral order doctrine is subject to all the usual appellate rules and time periods, including Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure." United States v. Moats, 961 F.2d 1198, 1203 (5th Cir.1992); see also Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 301 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987); 9 J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Co.
(2×)
“An appeal taken under the collateral order doctrine is subject to all the usual appellate rules and time periods, including Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.” United States v. Moats, 961 F.2d 1198, 1203 (5th Cir.1992); see also Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, 797 F.2d 297, 301 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1334 , 94 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987); 9 J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington Tour Guides Ass'n v. National Park Service
See, e.g., New Jersey Citizen Action v. Edison Township, 797 F.2d 1250 (3d Cir.1986) (city ordinance regulating door to door canvassing and solicitation by political action groups), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 186 (1987); City of Watseka v. Illinois Pub.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Imagineering, Inc. v. Kiewit Pacific Company
See, e.g., Religious Technology Ctr. v. Wollersheim, 796 F.2d 1076 , 1080 n. 6 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1103 , 107 S.Ct. 1336 , 94 L.Ed.2d 187 (1987) 2 Because of our resolution of the other issues raised in this appeal, we need not decide the significance of Wollersheim to the plaintiffs' request for disgorgement 3 In their brief, plaintiffs rely on Seattle Ordinance § 20.46.090 B.1, which provides in part that "bids or proposals not including both minority business enterprise and women's business enterprise participation in an amount which equals or exceeds that required by th…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hanton
v.
Kennedy
v.
Kennedy
No. 86-982.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1987.
Cited by 19 opinions | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (1) · D. South Carolina (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.