green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Savoie v. Merchants Bank
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. at 211. 3 In order to receive an award of attorney’s fees under the common fund doctrine, the plaintiff need not have won his lawsuit; “[flees may be awarded even when there is no judgment on the merits or when the dispute has become moot because the relief sought is otherwise obtained.” Koppel v. Wien, 743 F.2d 129, 135 (2d Cir.1984); see also Blau v. Rayette-Faberge, Inc., 389 F.2d 469, 474 (2d Cir.1968) (award of fees even though suit had not commenced); Kopet v. Esquire Realty Co., 523 F.2d 1005, 1008-09 (2d Cir.1975) (permissible to award fees for benefit arising from prosecutio…
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Savoie v. Merchants Bank
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. at 211. 3 19 In order to receive an award of attorney's fees under the common fund doctrine, the plaintiff need not have won his lawsuit; "[f]ees may be awarded even when there is no judgment on the merits or when the dispute has become moot because the relief sought is otherwise obtained." Koppel v. Wien, 743 F.2d 129, 135 (2d Cir.1984); see also Blau v. Rayette-Faberge, Inc., 389 F.2d 469, 474 (2d Cir.1968) (award of fees even though suit had not commenced); Kopet v. Esquire Realty Co., 523 F.2d 1005, 1008-09 (2d Cir.1975) (permissible to award fees for benefit arising from prosecution o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jeanne P. Herman v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local Union No. 971
(2×)
Id.; see also Tellez v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 817 F.2d 536, 539 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 908 , 108 S.Ct. 251 , 98 L.Ed.2d 209 (1987) (emotional distress claim not preempted where the collective bargaining agreement was "silent” and "vague” regarding the conduct that formed the basis of the claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corp.
(2×)
Compare Truex v. Garrett Freightlines, Inc., 784 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir.1985) (preemption where plaintiff complained of manner in which employer disciplined him, where collective bargaining agreement specified when and how discipline could be administered) and Olguin v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co., 740 F.2d 1468 (9th Cir.1984) (preemption where conduct complained of involved challenges to certain employment and work conditions, where such conditions were addressed in collective bargaining agreement) with Tellez v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 817 F.2d 536, 539 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Florian Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corporation Dennis Huse George Woodbury Jesse Cline Frank Roppel George Ishiyama Wayne Funk Ralph Fenner, Florian Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corporation Dennis Huse George Woodbury Jesse Cline Frank Roppel George Ishiyama Wayne Funk Ralph Fenner
(2×)
Compare Truex v. Garrett Freightlines, Inc., 784 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir.1985) (preemption where plaintiff complained of manner in which employer disciplined him, where collective bargaining agreement specified when and how discipline could be administered) and Olguin v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co., 740 F.2d 1468 (9th Cir.1984) (preemption where conduct complained of involved challenges to certain employment and work conditions, where such conditions were addressed in collective bargaining agreement) with Tellez v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 817 F.2d 536, 539 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
v.
Tellez
v.
Tellez
No. 87-261.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1987.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of California Employment Law Council et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.