green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1997 · 2 courts ·
…the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the eighth amendment applies only in criminal actions, following a conviction.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
White's Place, Inc. v. Glover
the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the eighth amendment applies only in criminal actions, following a conviction.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Johnson v. City of Dallas, Tex.
the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the eighth amendment applies only in criminal actions, following a conviction.
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Galveston County
See Palermo v. Rorex, 806 F.2d 1266 , (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 819 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re River City Hotel Corp.
See generally Apponi v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc., 809 F.2d 1210, 1217 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 820 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 90 cmt. b, illus. 2 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Justus v. Financial News Network Inc. (In Re Financial News Network Inc.)
Croix Hotel Corp., 682 F.2d 446, 448 (3d Cir.1982) (emphasis in original)); see Maritime Elec., 959 F.2d at 1205 (“within one case, actions against a debtor will be suspended even though closely related claims asserted by the debt- or may continue”); Brown v. Armstrong, 949 F.2d 1007, 1009-10 (8th Cir.1991). *573 Since section 362 mandates a stay only of litigation “against the debtor” designed to seize or exercise control over the property of the debtor, 11 U.S.C. § 362 (a), it does not prevent entities against whom the debtor proceeds in an offensive posture—for example, by initia…
discussed
Cited "see"
Nick Russo v. Health, Welfare & Pension Fund, Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
See Apponi v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc., 809 F.2d 1210 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 820 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987) (holding that an analogous interpretation of a comparable pension plan provision was not arbitrary or capricious).
cited
Cited "see"
Dolores Sweeney v. Westvaco Company, Dolores Sweeney v. Westvaco Company
See Apponi v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc., 809 F.2d 1210, 1215 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 820 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987); National Metalcrafters, Div. of Keystone Consol.
discussed
Cited "see"
McLemore v. Third National Bank (In Re Montgomery)
See Apponi v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc., 809 F.2d 1210, 1217 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, Sunshine Biscuits, Inc. v. Apponi, 484 U.S. 820 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987) (elements of federal common law estoppel); First Nat’l Bank of Rogersville v. Hawkins County, 62 Tenn.App. 459 , 463 S.W.2d 946, 950-51 (1970) (equitable estoppel by conduct “deeply ingrained” in law of Tennessee).
discussed
Cited "see"
Manhattan Industries, Inc. v. Sweater Bee by Banff, Ltd.
See Apponi v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc., 809 F.2d 1210, 1220 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 820 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987); Morgan v. Kerrigan, 530 F.2d 401, 427 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 935 , 96 S.Ct. 2649 , 49 L.Ed.2d 386 (1976). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
Manhattan Industries, Inc., Bayard Shirt Corporation, and Don Sophisticates, Inc. v. Sweater Bee by Banff, Ltd., and Robert Belsky, Sweater Bee by Banff, Ltd., Contempt-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Manhattan Industries, Inc., Bayard Shirt Corporation, Champpierre, Ltd., Laurence L. Leeds, Jr., Donald Kallman, Robert Hamel, and Fred Feldstein, Contempt-Defendants, Manhattan Industries, Inc., Bayard Shirt Corporation, Donald Kallman, and Robert Hamel, Contempt-Defendants-Appellees
See Apponi v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc., 809 F.2d 1210, 1220 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 820 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987); Morgan v. Kerrigan, 530 F.2d 401, 427 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 935 , 96 S.Ct. 2649 , 49 L.Ed.2d 386 (1976). 3.
cited
Cited "see"
Morse v. Adams
See Apponi v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc., 809 F.2d 1210, 1217 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Morse v. Adams
See Apponi v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc., 809 F.2d 1210, 1217 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987) 2 As we have stated, we do not reach the issue of whether a plaintiff with standing may sue a fiduciary in his or her own behalf or only on behalf of the plan.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lawrence Moon v. Larry Phillips
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Palermo v. Rorex, 806 F.2d 1266 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987); Franks v. Nimmo, 796 F.2d 1230 (10th Cir.1986); Gleason v. Malcom, 718 F.2d 1044 (11th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lincoln Electric Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
See also Apponi v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc., 809 F.2d 1210, 1217 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 820 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987). 59.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stanley Koolik, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Stanley Markowitz, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee
See, e.g., In re Berry Estates, Inc., 812 F.2d 67, 71 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 819 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987); Ostano Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Systems, Inc., 790 F.2d 206, 207 (2d Cir.1986) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co.
See, e.g., Apponi v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc., 809 F. 2d 1210, 1217 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 820 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 40 (1987); Mardirosian v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maritime Electric Company, Inc., a New York Corporation v. United Jersey Bank, a New Jersey Banking Corporation Michael Gill and Maritime Electric Company, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation. Michael Gill, Third-Party v. Maritime Electric Company, Inc., a New York Corporation Thomas Gill, Individually and in His Capacity as President of Maritime Electric Company, Inc., (n.y.), Third-Party Maritime Electric Co., Inc., (Plaintiff and Third-Party Defendant) and Thomas Gill (Third-Party Defendant)
See also In re Berry Estates, 812 F.2d 67 , 71 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 819 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987); Martin-Trigona, 892 F.2d at 577 . 51 Whether a specific judicial proceeding falls within the scope of the automatic stay must be determined by looking at the proceeding "at its inception." St.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Maritime Electric Co. v. United Jersey Bank
See also In re Berry Estates, 812 F.2d 67, 71 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 819 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987); Martin-Trigona, 892 F.2d at 577 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arthur A. Morales v. Department of the Army and the United States of America
See also, Palermo v. Rorex, 806 F.2d 1266 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 819 , 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987) (fact that “administrative remedies available will not allow complete recovery” does not change the result demanded by Bush).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goldsten Real Estate v. Rent Administrator Rental Accommodations (In Re 1736 18th Street, N.W., Ltd. Partnership)
Compare In re Revere Copper and Brass, Inc., 29 B.R. 584, 587-88 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 32 B.R. 725 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (action by private environmental group did not come within exception' even though fines would be payable to the Government) with In re Berry Estates, Inc., 812 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 77 , 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987) (action by governmental unit to recover excess rent came within exception).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Baumann-Furrie & Co.
v.
Commodity Credit Corporation, United States Department of Agriculture
v.
Commodity Credit Corporation, United States Department of Agriculture
No. 86-1837.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1) · M.D. Florida (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.