Davis v. Siloo Inc., 283 S.E.2d 131 (N.C. 1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Davis v. Siloo Inc., 283 S.E.2d 131 (N.C. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2002 · …a city cannot be estopped to enforce a zoning ordinance against a violator due to the conduct of a zoning official in encouraging or permitting the violation. ⚠ not in text
53 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Overton v. Camden County (ncctapp, 2002-12-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Overton v. Camden County (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2002 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
a city cannot be estopped to enforce a zoning ordinance against a violator due to the conduct of a zoning official in encouraging or permitting the violation.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Bogle (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Davis v. Siloo Inc., 47 N.C.App. 237, 247 , 267 S.E.2d 354, 360 , disc. rev. denied, 301 N.C. 234 , 283 S.E.2d 131 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davis
v.
SILOO INCORPORATED
354PC.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 7, 1980.
283 S.E.2d 131
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 October 1980.