State v. Simpson, 302 S.E.2d 247 (N.C. 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Simpson, 302 S.E.2d 247 (N.C. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,392 Arthur Hunt J. Edgar Ramsey v. Michael L. Miller Roberts, Cogburn, McClure and Williams, a Partnership, and Interstate Securities Corporation William C. Jordan James E. Bradley, Jr., Manual Woodworkers, Inc. v. Michael L. Miller Roberts, Cogburn, McClure and Williams, a Partnership, and Interstate Securities Corporation William C. Jordan James E. Bradley, Jr., Arthur Hunt J. Edgar Ramsey v. Interstate Securities Corporation, and William C. Jordan James E. Bradley, Jr. Michael L. Miller Roberts, Cogburn, McClure and Williams, a Partnership, Manual Woodworkers, Inc. v. Interstate Securities Corporation, and William C. Jordan James E. Bradley, Jr. Michael L. Miller Roberts, Cogburn, McClure and Williams, a Partnership (ca4, 1990-08-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,392 Arthur Hunt J. Edgar Ramsey v. Michael L. Miller Roberts, Cogburn, McClure and Williams, a Partnership, and Interstate Securities Corporation William C. Jordan James E. Bradley, Jr., Manual Woodworkers, Inc. v. Michael L. Miller Roberts, Cogburn, McClure and Williams, a Partnership, and Interstate Securities Corporation William C. Jordan James E. Bradley, Jr., Arthur Hunt J. Edgar Ramsey v. Interstate Securities Corporation, and William C. Jordan James E. Bradley, Jr. Michael L. Miller Roberts, Cogburn, McClure and Williams, a Partnership, Manual Woodworkers, Inc. v. Interstate Securities Corporation, and William C. Jordan James E. Bradley, Jr. Michael L. Miller Roberts, Cogburn, McClure and Williams, a Partnership
4th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United Leasing Corp. v. Miller, 60 N.C.App. 40, 44-54 , 298 S.E.2d 409, 412-18 (1982), rev. den., 308 N.C. 194 , 302 S.E.2d 248 (1983). 16 As the North Carolina Supreme Court has explained: 36 A defendant ... is entitled to have any evidence tending to establish contributory negligence considered in the light most favorable to him and, if diverse inferences can reasonably be drawn from it, the evidence must be submitted to the jury with appropriate instructions as to its bearing on the issue. 37 Atkins v. Moye, 277 N.C. 179, 184 , 176 S.E.2d 789, 793 (1970); see also Radford v. Norris, 74 …
discussed Cited "see" Hunt v. Miller
4th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United Leasing Corp. v. Miller, 60 N.C.App. 40, 44-54 , 298 S.E.2d 409, 412-18 (1982), rev. den., 308 N.C. 194 , 302 S.E.2d 248 (1983). 16 As the North Carolina Supreme Court has explained: A defendant ... is entitled to have any evidence tending to establish contributory negligence considered in the light most favorable to him and, if diverse inferences can reasonably be drawn from it, the evidence must be submitted to the jury with appropriate instructions as to its bearing on the issue.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
SIMPSON
No. 78P83.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 5, 1983.
302 S.E.2d 247
Published

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 1983.